Active Users:2297 Time:27/07/2026 06:39:25 AM
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. Joel Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM
If you need one. The whole ESPN crew was stunned.

"This video is not authorized for your location (NO)" In case I, like, FORGOT WHERE I AM. :P

Huh. Why is football illegal where you are?

Er, it is not? Or if it is, the laws are VERY loosely enforced; I have been known to play catch with friends and family in the park (in public! WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?! :O)

Nah, football is not illegal here, but ESPN, NBC and a lot of networks do not want to show their stuff overseas unless people pay; often they cannot be bothered to make it availabe even when people are able and eager to pay. Hopefully there will be a link of the play somewhere else soon; I might try NFL.com later if it does not crash Chrome yet again, because I do not have to worry about violating their copyright on their site.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 749 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 894 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 853 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 540 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 953 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 769 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 999 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 954 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 995 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 843 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 1124 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1452 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 910 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 970 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 969 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 908 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 440 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 1062 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 457 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 819 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 1042 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 1059 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 950 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 869 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 1058 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 958 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 911 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 962 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 914 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 993 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 990 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 563 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 478 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 446 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 880 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 447 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 852 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 930 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 882 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 428 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 411 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 991 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 787 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 1219 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 1223 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 898 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 1050 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 880 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 1086 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 1114 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 923 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 933 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 1448 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 1036 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 836 Views

Reply to Message