Active Users:2178 Time:27/07/2026 06:43:33 AM
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. Joel Send a noteboard - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM
At least not as a resident, and not even temporarily since... '09, I think.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 749 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 895 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 854 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 540 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 954 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 770 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 1000 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 955 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 995 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 844 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 1126 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1454 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 912 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 970 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 970 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 910 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 440 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 1063 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 457 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 821 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 1044 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 1060 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 952 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 870 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 1058 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 960 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 911 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 964 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 915 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 994 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 992 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 563 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 478 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 446 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 882 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 447 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 853 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 932 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 884 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 428 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 411 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 993 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 788 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 1221 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 1224 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 900 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 1051 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 881 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 1088 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 1115 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 925 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 934 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 1449 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 1038 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 837 Views

Reply to Message