I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball.
Joel Send a noteboard - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM
However, here is a new rule for general life based on the call from the end of tonight's game: If you are holding your baby and I walk up and grab your baby, I own your baby.
Like I say, I REALLY want to see this play, because when you put it like that, that is actually true on a football field: If a player on one team takes a ball away from a player on the other before the whistle blows, forward progress is stopped; before the ball carrier is DOWN, the player who strips the ball gains possession. In the case of receivers stripping defenders that is doubly so, because when possession is contested, simultaneous possession goes to the RECEIVER (one of many football rules favoring the offense.)
So if that how it is actually went—the Packers DB did not take a knee, go out of bounds or otherwise end the play before stripped—yeah, that sounds like a TD.
The DB had possession first and then Golden Tate gained co-possession as they were coming down. The rule is that the ball goes to the passing team if they gain control simultaneously.... which they did not. Or at least, it appeared that way to me.
Tates left hand is between Jennings'; it is physically impossible for Jennings to catch the ball with both hands unless Tates left hand is on it, too. His right hand (though it is hard to see on the YouTube clip (try 0:57-58)) appears to me be over Jennings' right arm and on the ball. That is simultaneous possession. I am not even 100% certain any part of Jennings' body except his feet was on the ground AFTER the catch (and before Tate had sole possession,) which would make it a reg'lar ol' strip and whoever had it last had possession. That the catch began with both of Tates hands on the ball and ended with Jennings' on top of him trying (but failing) to pry it from his arms makes me pretty certain the call was correct.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 26/09/2012 at 02:34:00 AM
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM
772 Views
Link? Clip?
- 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM
923 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM
560 Views
Here's a link.
- 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM
994 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post.
- 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM
812 Views
youtube link
- 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM
1044 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD.
- 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM
893 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened
- 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM
1174 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver.
- 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM
1496 Views
watch a better replay if you can
- 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM
952 Views
Have now; still not convinced.
- 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM
1014 Views
*MN*
also, the pass interference on tate that wasn't called is clear at 0:56 in that clip
- 25/09/2012 11:27:36 AM
986 Views
Tate was looking for the ball, and raised his hands to catch it, not push off Sam Shields.
- 26/09/2012 01:33:46 AM
920 Views
watch a better replay and get back to me on this one.
- 26/09/2012 02:36:43 AM
973 Views
Where did the NFL head office acknowledge that?
- 26/09/2012 03:52:36 AM
1069 Views
in their official response to the whole incident....?
- 26/09/2012 04:14:52 AM
1193 Views
Fair enough then; the NFLs official position is that offensive PI should have been called.
- 26/09/2012 04:45:58 AM
983 Views
Yeah, if one hand counts as possession
- 25/09/2012 05:15:37 PM
979 Views
Left hand between Jennings' arms and on the ball; right was outside Jennings' arm and on the ball.
- 26/09/2012 01:38:28 AM
918 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM
459 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited.
- 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM
1104 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees...
- 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM
1089 Views
Now I really want to see this play.
- 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM
1099 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play.
- 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM
1005 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball.
- 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM
929 Views
You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs
- 25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM
1021 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year
- 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM
1005 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too.....
- 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM
962 Views
Possession doesn't mean squat until you land. Tate had it by then
- 25/09/2012 03:13:29 PM
959 Views
he had nothing until they landed and he tried to pull it away. everyone but you agrees on this *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:25:43 PM
454 Views
Not so; Cannoli and I agree on pretty much every point involved in this play.
- 26/09/2012 02:17:01 AM
932 Views
They can't reverse that call.
- 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM
1038 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete
- 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM
1035 Views
It was very obviously caught; you can't rule that incomplete.
- 25/09/2012 11:06:17 PM
937 Views
my philosophy is "interception = incomplete" but i think that's only for stats purposes
- 26/09/2012 12:32:43 AM
895 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM
583 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM*
- 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM
499 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM*
- 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM
478 Views
I have seen enough of it, and while I did not write Cannolis response, I easily could have.
- 26/09/2012 02:06:45 AM
954 Views
Slightly (very) loopy yet entertaining piece on why Ayn Rand is to blame for all of this.
- 25/09/2012 05:38:12 PM
908 Views
She hates revenue sharing, salary caps & the draft, too, but the Pack would be screwed without each.
- 26/09/2012 03:34:00 AM
935 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see
- 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM
1032 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times.
- 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM
833 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it?
- 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM
1263 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip.
- 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM
1272 Views
you sure you saw the right replay?
- 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM
961 Views
Think so, yeah.
- 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM
1092 Views
from another angle -- pun intended
- 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM
928 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip?
- 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM
1127 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug*
- 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM
1156 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily.
- 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM
960 Views
did you even read that article???
- 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM
985 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...."
- 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM
1510 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me 
either way, you're still wrong 
- 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
1077 Views
either way, you're still wrong
- 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
1077 Views
Worst calls are made all the time by the regular officials.
- 26/09/2012 01:23:57 AM
936 Views
yes, but not usually more than one per game, certainly not several in a single weekend.... *NM*
- 26/09/2012 02:39:56 AM
471 Views