here is an exercise for you: find me ONE article that does not come from the NFL office or quotes the NFL official position about that game which does not contain some form of the phrase "cost the packers a win" and i will consider conceding the point to how wrong you are interpreting the phantom catch by tate. the vast, vast, vast, vast majority of the people who cover this sort of thing for a living, and the ones who get paid to analyze the game tapes all believe tate never had simultaneous possession. if you can find me one single instance where someone who covers sports for a living does not think the TD call was incorrect i will let you have this one.
His name is Jason Fisk; his email is on the sites main page (scroll down) if interested in disputing his arguments. In particular note the first rule he cites:
A.R. 8.25: First-and-10 on A20. A2 and B3 simultaneously control a pass in the air at the A40. As they land, both players land on their feet and wrestle for the ball on their feet. Eventually, B3 takes the ball away from A2 and is tackled at the A38.
Ruling: B’s ball, first-and-10 on A38. Until one of the players in simultaneous possession of the ball goes to the ground or out of bounds, the ball remains alive.
Ruling: B’s ball, first-and-10 on A38. Until one of the players in simultaneous possession of the ball goes to the ground or out of bounds, the ball remains alive.
Even though, by rule, simultaneous possession goes to the receiver, the defender gets it if strips it and gains sole possession before the receiver is down. Obviously the reverse is also true. Therefore, the ONLY way Green Bay gets that ball is IF:
1) Jennings unambiguously had sole possession first AND 2) Was down before Tate obtained sole possession from him.
Even with replay it is very hard to argue Jennings unambiguously had sole possession first, and he landed ON Tate, so good luck meeting both listed requirements. Regardless, expecting officials to see in real time what we cannot even see in multi-angle slo-mo is asking the impossible.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM
719 Views
Link? Clip?
- 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM
782 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM
493 Views
Here's a link.
- 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM
881 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post.
- 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM
696 Views
youtube link
- 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM
908 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD.
- 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM
781 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened
- 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM
1048 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver.
- 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM
1384 Views
watch a better replay if you can
- 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM
842 Views
Have now; still not convinced.
- 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM
886 Views
also, the pass interference on tate that wasn't called is clear at 0:56 in that clip
- 25/09/2012 11:27:36 AM
864 Views
Tate was looking for the ball, and raised his hands to catch it, not push off Sam Shields.
- 26/09/2012 01:33:46 AM
809 Views
watch a better replay and get back to me on this one.
- 26/09/2012 02:36:43 AM
854 Views
Where did the NFL head office acknowledge that?
- 26/09/2012 03:52:36 AM
943 Views
in their official response to the whole incident....?
- 26/09/2012 04:14:52 AM
1079 Views
Fair enough then; the NFLs official position is that offensive PI should have been called.
- 26/09/2012 04:45:58 AM
871 Views
Yeah, if one hand counts as possession
- 25/09/2012 05:15:37 PM
866 Views
Left hand between Jennings' arms and on the ball; right was outside Jennings' arm and on the ball.
- 26/09/2012 01:38:28 AM
800 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM
410 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited.
- 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM
990 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees...
- 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM
961 Views
Now I really want to see this play.
- 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM
980 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play.
- 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM
877 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball.
- 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM
801 Views
You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs
- 25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM
881 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year
- 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM
897 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too.....
- 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM
845 Views
Possession doesn't mean squat until you land. Tate had it by then
- 25/09/2012 03:13:29 PM
844 Views
he had nothing until they landed and he tried to pull it away. everyone but you agrees on this *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:25:43 PM
399 Views
Not so; Cannoli and I agree on pretty much every point involved in this play.
- 26/09/2012 02:17:01 AM
819 Views
They can't reverse that call.
- 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM
932 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete
- 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM
911 Views
It was very obviously caught; you can't rule that incomplete.
- 25/09/2012 11:06:17 PM
821 Views
my philosophy is "interception = incomplete" but i think that's only for stats purposes
- 26/09/2012 12:32:43 AM
790 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM
536 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM*
- 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM
444 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM*
- 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM
406 Views
I have seen enough of it, and while I did not write Cannolis response, I easily could have.
- 26/09/2012 02:06:45 AM
841 Views
Slightly (very) loopy yet entertaining piece on why Ayn Rand is to blame for all of this.
- 25/09/2012 05:38:12 PM
786 Views
She hates revenue sharing, salary caps & the draft, too, but the Pack would be screwed without each.
- 26/09/2012 03:34:00 AM
814 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see
- 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM
908 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times.
- 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM
713 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it?
- 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM
1145 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip.
- 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM
1146 Views
you sure you saw the right replay?
- 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM
820 Views
Think so, yeah.
- 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM
982 Views
from another angle -- pun intended
- 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM
817 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip?
- 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM
1008 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug*
- 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM
1046 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily.
- 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM
859 Views
did you even read that article???
- 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM
858 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...."
- 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM
1276 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me 
either way, you're still wrong 
- 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
960 Views
either way, you're still wrong
- 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
960 Views
Worst calls are made all the time by the regular officials.
- 26/09/2012 01:23:57 AM
823 Views
yes, but not usually more than one per game, certainly not several in a single weekend.... *NM*
- 26/09/2012 02:39:56 AM
414 Views