They do it because the general morality of the country changes over time. If they didn't, we would still have slavery and women couldn't vote. Sometime to make the change, proponents have to wrap it in logic, but the base reason for the change is moral.
I'm referring to things that aren't inherently wrong, merely made illegal because of religious (Christian) reasons. Things like gay marriage, prostitution, gambling, drugs, etc. As long as something is done by one or more consenting adults, and if there is harm it's done only to the consenting adults, it should be legal.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy?
- 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM
1507 Views
Legal rights.
- 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM
905 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM*
- 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM
437 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM*
- 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM
425 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does.
- 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM
842 Views
That's not what I'm saying
- 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM
854 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard!
- 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM
803 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence..
- 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM
875 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid.
- 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM
790 Views
The more fool you.
- 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM
890 Views
This, and legal recognition of it, is precisely why marriage has become an Equal Protection issue.
- 22/10/2012 03:40:01 PM
854 Views
*NM*
Because they are both violations of the paradigm of genuine marriage. Like it or not.
- 21/10/2012 05:49:32 AM
774 Views
I have no problem with polygamy being legal, but marriage is a privilege and can be limited to two.
- 20/10/2012 04:16:08 AM
896 Views
The only problem with that is that it was established with a heterosexist assumption
- 21/10/2012 06:33:32 AM
865 Views
From a legal perspective, all of your arguments are irrelevant
- 21/10/2012 03:12:39 PM
971 Views
This really is blatantly obvious, but still it might bear repeating...
- 21/10/2012 04:43:13 PM
846 Views
Yes, but only if its equal. Multi-people relationships should be more acceptable by society.
- 20/10/2012 05:15:24 AM
900 Views
*NM*
"Polygamy" is the all-inclusive term; whether or not he meant it, he said it.
- 22/10/2012 04:31:09 PM
791 Views
I support autogamy in addition to various forms of exogenic relationships
- 20/10/2012 05:49:07 AM
822 Views
Have you seen the Glee episode where Sue Sylvester conducts a marriage of herself to herself? *NM*
- 20/10/2012 09:50:32 AM
429 Views
I am fine with it if all existing parties to the marriage consent to each addition.
- 20/10/2012 10:10:19 AM
925 Views
The case for polygamy has really weakened rather than strenghtened, you might say.
- 20/10/2012 03:53:34 PM
1016 Views
I have no problem with it, but as Amy says, it's not really relevant. *NM*
- 20/10/2012 05:40:50 PM
452 Views
Legalize polygamy and create a familymaking process, but don't cover polygamy under marriage.
- 20/10/2012 10:14:58 PM
816 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway
- 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM
871 Views
Indeed
- 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM
935 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business.
- 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM
1209 Views
And so?
- 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM
829 Views
Re: And so?
- 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM
1029 Views
So can we call it garriage, give the same legal effect and call it good? *NM*
- 22/10/2012 03:28:33 AM
434 Views
According to your argument we could afford gay couples the same legal privileges...
- 22/10/2012 03:20:17 AM
769 Views
"...separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."
- 22/10/2012 04:45:31 PM
832 Views
That may well be the ideal solution. And also the most ironically amusing in how it would fail.
- 22/10/2012 07:35:05 PM
794 Views
We already went there and did that in '04, and yes, it was funny as f--k.
- 22/10/2012 09:51:49 PM
749 Views
Agreed in principle, but custody/cohabitation/assets go well beyond name change.
- 22/10/2012 04:37:09 PM
805 Views
This is the sort of thing that *needs* to be about principle
- 23/10/2012 04:54:10 AM
732 Views
Parental, property and other rights need government protection, and thus government involvement.
- 23/10/2012 05:14:37 AM
769 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none.
- 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM
881 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed.
- 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM
805 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government.
- 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM
746 Views
Much less force, yes.
- 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM
744 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business."
- 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM
826 Views
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business."
- 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM
753 Views
Like you said: By referring to "all invididuals" (or, better, "persons" or "citizens.")
- 24/10/2012 04:14:55 PM
775 Views
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences.
- 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM
835 Views
I have several friends who practice polyamory, if they wanted to marry I would support it. *NM*
- 24/10/2012 06:47:58 PM
404 Views