I specifically said at the beginning of my post that I was trying to get into this argument. I wanted to get a sampling of opinions on polygamy from a group that is not hung up on the traditional view of marriage. The reason I specifically addressed supporters of gay marriage is because I know what most other people will say.
Lots of supporters of gay marriage affect an objective or even-handed position, when they are really just shilling for a special interest for the group with whom they sympathize. It is not really about "equality" and personal definitions and choices (since they are trying to strip everyone else of the right to choose to recognize their role-playing games as real or refuse the same), it is about obtaining a special privilege for homosexuals, which they agree with that group obtaining, whether out of sentiment or personal interest.
Marriage is a thing. You don't change its nature by adding a word to the label and making it appear that the true nature of the thing is actually only as aspect of the real nature. That is the view of proponents of marriage. The proponents of alternative domestic arrangements have their own agendas and are as beholden to them as anyone else. They will not be any more fair or impartial, because their reasons for their choice are just as personal and egocentric as anyone's.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy?
- 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM
1581 Views
Legal rights.
- 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM
983 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM*
- 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM
475 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM*
- 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM
457 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does.
- 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM
928 Views
That's not what I'm saying
- 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM
922 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard!
- 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM
888 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence..
- 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM
939 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid.
- 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM
861 Views
The more fool you.
- 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM
950 Views
This, and legal recognition of it, is precisely why marriage has become an Equal Protection issue.
- 22/10/2012 03:40:01 PM
928 Views
Because they are both violations of the paradigm of genuine marriage. Like it or not.
- 21/10/2012 05:49:32 AM
839 Views
I have no problem with polygamy being legal, but marriage is a privilege and can be limited to two.
- 20/10/2012 04:16:08 AM
966 Views
The only problem with that is that it was established with a heterosexist assumption
- 21/10/2012 06:33:32 AM
948 Views
From a legal perspective, all of your arguments are irrelevant
- 21/10/2012 03:12:39 PM
1054 Views
This really is blatantly obvious, but still it might bear repeating...
- 21/10/2012 04:43:13 PM
913 Views
Yes, but only if its equal. Multi-people relationships should be more acceptable by society.
- 20/10/2012 05:15:24 AM
957 Views
"Polygamy" is the all-inclusive term; whether or not he meant it, he said it.
- 22/10/2012 04:31:09 PM
880 Views
I support autogamy in addition to various forms of exogenic relationships
- 20/10/2012 05:49:07 AM
879 Views
Have you seen the Glee episode where Sue Sylvester conducts a marriage of herself to herself? *NM*
- 20/10/2012 09:50:32 AM
469 Views
I am fine with it if all existing parties to the marriage consent to each addition.
- 20/10/2012 10:10:19 AM
1004 Views
The case for polygamy has really weakened rather than strenghtened, you might say.
- 20/10/2012 03:53:34 PM
1090 Views
I have no problem with it, but as Amy says, it's not really relevant. *NM*
- 20/10/2012 05:40:50 PM
487 Views
Legalize polygamy and create a familymaking process, but don't cover polygamy under marriage.
- 20/10/2012 10:14:58 PM
890 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway
- 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM
942 Views
Indeed
- 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM
993 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business.
- 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM
1293 Views
And so?
- 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM
910 Views
Re: And so?
- 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM
1099 Views
So can we call it garriage, give the same legal effect and call it good? *NM*
- 22/10/2012 03:28:33 AM
462 Views
According to your argument we could afford gay couples the same legal privileges...
- 22/10/2012 03:20:17 AM
845 Views
"...separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."
- 22/10/2012 04:45:31 PM
903 Views
That may well be the ideal solution. And also the most ironically amusing in how it would fail.
- 22/10/2012 07:35:05 PM
874 Views
We already went there and did that in '04, and yes, it was funny as f--k.
- 22/10/2012 09:51:49 PM
825 Views
Agreed in principle, but custody/cohabitation/assets go well beyond name change.
- 22/10/2012 04:37:09 PM
880 Views
This is the sort of thing that *needs* to be about principle
- 23/10/2012 04:54:10 AM
814 Views
Parental, property and other rights need government protection, and thus government involvement.
- 23/10/2012 05:14:37 AM
844 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none.
- 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM
969 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed.
- 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM
881 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government.
- 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM
806 Views
Much less force, yes.
- 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM
810 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business."
- 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM
908 Views
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business."
- 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM
824 Views
Like you said: By referring to "all invididuals" (or, better, "persons" or "citizens.")
- 24/10/2012 04:14:55 PM
833 Views
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences.
- 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM
894 Views
I have several friends who practice polyamory, if they wanted to marry I would support it. *NM*
- 24/10/2012 06:47:58 PM
453 Views

*NM*
*NM*