Active Users:454 Time:03/05/2025 03:35:37 AM
Indeed Cannoli Send a noteboard - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM
Nobody should be bound to define their mutually consensual relationships with other adults of sound mind unless the state has a undeniably clear reason to butt their noses in, like a legal contract for custody or cohabitation or shared assets, etc. Now religion or personal? Different story, plural marriage is immoral in my opinion and nobody has a right to make me personally recognize it as valid.
And that right there is the crux of the marriage debate. Let them pile up in a multi-person bed, or cornhole each other behind closed doors. Just do not expect me to call a spade anything but a spade, and don't expect me to call it a spade if it isn't. Two or more women or two or more men involved in any way shape or form is not a marriage. End of story, and no one has the right to force me to call it as such.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1426 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 829 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 804 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 786 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 789 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 720 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 429 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 786 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 455 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 401 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 404 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 754 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 392 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 758 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 779 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 731 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 795 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 720 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 816 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 592 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 751 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 848 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 725 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 722 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 795 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 856 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1126 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 752 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 932 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 809 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 726 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 666 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 678 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 747 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 336 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 640 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 845 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 731 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 769 Views

Reply to Message