Active Users:2269 Time:18/06/2026 12:03:11 PM
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM
There are legal rights only granted to spouses, ranging from medical to tax-related. How does whether a preacher presidse over the union or not have any bearing on whether those rights are warranted? If you think that from a economic and legal standpoint, civil unions have no purpose, then religious unions have no purpose in that light either.


Civil laws and customs granting such rights or privileges to marriage are recognizing a long-standing and wide-spread practice. Laws granting those same privileges to same-sex partnerships are imposing a novelty practice. There is no basis for same sex marriage, because the practices and customs associated with marriage originate with the difference in genders, a situation which does not apply to same-sex unions.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage - 17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM 1689 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part - 17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM 993 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin. - 17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM 1004 Views
God your a moron. - 17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM 940 Views
be nice - 18/01/2010 06:26:58 AM 866 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like - 18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM 947 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM 906 Views
Re: And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 20/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 864 Views
It is, I believe, hardest for the intelligent educated man. - 21/01/2010 10:29:39 AM 1025 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM 887 Views
LOL... *NM* - 18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM 499 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive. - 18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM 803 Views
why do you imply "constructive" is in anyway the intent? *NM* - 18/01/2010 06:32:27 AM 391 Views
*shrug* I never stopped believing in lost causes? - 18/01/2010 07:36:04 AM 801 Views
Re: You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 18/01/2010 06:28:41 AM 983 Views
Always welcome. - 18/01/2010 07:31:27 AM 1039 Views
We finally converted you - 17/01/2010 08:43:25 PM 824 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM* - 17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM 529 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM* - 17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM 401 Views
seriously. *NM* - 17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM 353 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM* - 19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM 447 Views
yeah no kidding - 18/01/2010 06:30:45 AM 802 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate. - 18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM 1003 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care? - 18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM 812 Views
Correct - 18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM 887 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments, - 18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM 878 Views
Thank you. - 20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM 1053 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me. - 21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM 936 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about? - 27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM 772 Views
Link? - 27/01/2010 09:28:22 AM 909 Views
I can't find a link to the exact quote - 27/01/2010 12:14:19 PM 1003 Views
Re: Link? - 27/01/2010 01:38:36 PM 1008 Views
Perhaps we should define our terms more precisely. - 15/02/2010 11:28:09 AM 1389 Views
we do not exist in a free market. - 18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM 790 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM 398 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment. - 18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM 774 Views
No I am not. - 19/01/2010 10:44:31 PM 885 Views
That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM 829 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM 871 Views
civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 18/01/2010 04:49:12 AM 817 Views
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM 954 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:13:54 AM 827 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 19/01/2010 10:59:45 PM 803 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM 971 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 20/01/2010 01:38:37 AM 739 Views
Are you at all surprised? - 18/01/2010 07:59:30 AM 837 Views
A truly free country means I don't have the freedom to shoot you - 18/01/2010 05:57:44 AM 946 Views
You really said nothing, right there. - 18/01/2010 08:34:33 AM 871 Views
I presume you are equally against the current set up - 18/01/2010 12:31:33 PM 914 Views
He said as much in his response to me above. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:37:49 PM 339 Views
That's such an amusing argument - 18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM 798 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM* - 19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM 355 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM* - 19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM 336 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta - 21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM 793 Views
I can't help but find it funny - 18/01/2010 12:51:57 PM 783 Views
So... - 18/01/2010 03:39:33 PM 940 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out - 18/01/2010 04:11:05 PM 816 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't - 18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM 915 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM 299 Views
I don't think it was that clear - 18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM 856 Views
I don't think it is all that clear yet, either - 18/01/2010 10:27:54 PM 860 Views
I wasn't taking sides - 18/01/2010 10:57:39 PM 762 Views

Reply to Message