Active Users:828 Time:06/08/2025 12:30:10 AM
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM
There are legal rights only granted to spouses, ranging from medical to tax-related. How does whether a preacher presidse over the union or not have any bearing on whether those rights are warranted? If you think that from a economic and legal standpoint, civil unions have no purpose, then religious unions have no purpose in that light either.


Civil laws and customs granting such rights or privileges to marriage are recognizing a long-standing and wide-spread practice. Laws granting those same privileges to same-sex partnerships are imposing a novelty practice. There is no basis for same sex marriage, because the practices and customs associated with marriage originate with the difference in genders, a situation which does not apply to same-sex unions.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage - 17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM 1510 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part - 17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM 819 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin. - 17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM 817 Views
God your a moron. - 17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM 770 Views
be nice - 18/01/2010 06:26:58 AM 675 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like - 18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM 724 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM 733 Views
Re: And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 20/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 685 Views
It is, I believe, hardest for the intelligent educated man. - 21/01/2010 10:29:39 AM 831 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM 716 Views
LOL... *NM* - 18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM 391 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive. - 18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM 631 Views
why do you imply "constructive" is in anyway the intent? *NM* - 18/01/2010 06:32:27 AM 308 Views
*shrug* I never stopped believing in lost causes? - 18/01/2010 07:36:04 AM 636 Views
Re: You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 18/01/2010 06:28:41 AM 771 Views
Always welcome. - 18/01/2010 07:31:27 AM 880 Views
We finally converted you - 17/01/2010 08:43:25 PM 654 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM* - 17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM 449 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM* - 17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM 312 Views
seriously. *NM* - 17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM 268 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM* - 19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM 338 Views
yeah no kidding - 18/01/2010 06:30:45 AM 641 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate. - 18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM 818 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care? - 18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM 635 Views
Correct - 18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM 717 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments, - 18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM 710 Views
Thank you. - 20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM 865 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me. - 21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM 731 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about? - 27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM 606 Views
Link? - 27/01/2010 09:28:22 AM 702 Views
I can't find a link to the exact quote - 27/01/2010 12:14:19 PM 813 Views
Re: Link? - 27/01/2010 01:38:36 PM 834 Views
Perhaps we should define our terms more precisely. - 15/02/2010 11:28:09 AM 1204 Views
we do not exist in a free market. - 18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM 646 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM 316 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment. - 18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM 594 Views
No I am not. - 19/01/2010 10:44:31 PM 725 Views
That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM 675 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM 693 Views
civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 18/01/2010 04:49:12 AM 672 Views
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM 734 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:13:54 AM 677 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 19/01/2010 10:59:45 PM 642 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM 784 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 20/01/2010 01:38:37 AM 564 Views
Are you at all surprised? - 18/01/2010 07:59:30 AM 665 Views
A truly free country means I don't have the freedom to shoot you - 18/01/2010 05:57:44 AM 763 Views
You really said nothing, right there. - 18/01/2010 08:34:33 AM 712 Views
I presume you are equally against the current set up - 18/01/2010 12:31:33 PM 748 Views
He said as much in his response to me above. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:37:49 PM 255 Views
That's such an amusing argument - 18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM 626 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM* - 19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM 276 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM* - 19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM 252 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta - 21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM 604 Views
I can't help but find it funny - 18/01/2010 12:51:57 PM 615 Views
So... - 18/01/2010 03:39:33 PM 755 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out - 18/01/2010 04:11:05 PM 638 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't - 18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM 742 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM 234 Views
I don't think it was that clear - 18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM 670 Views
I don't think it is all that clear yet, either - 18/01/2010 10:27:54 PM 697 Views
I wasn't taking sides - 18/01/2010 10:57:39 PM 574 Views

Reply to Message