You want detailed answers that require detailed data I don't have.
Joel Send a noteboard - 03/09/2009 06:06:55 AM
And that, because I work for a living, I don't have time to research. If you'd care to pay my bills and set aside money to get my fiancee to me (or vice versa) I'd be happy to find an answer for you.
Otherwise, those things take priority over answering your question right now, apart from saying it would vary with the individuals earnings and cost of living as well as annual increases in inflation.
If tax revenue increased so much while nonmilitary spending fell so much (both documented facts) then we were horribly misled by the cost of the Iraq war. Which makes statistics provided by those who misled us rather dubious.
What, for example, do YOU specifically mean by "the rich paid a higher portion of income taxes and tax revenue increased to record highs"? I'd like to see a source on the latter given we were in a series of recessions for most of Bushs two terms. With the increases we saw in unemployment I can certainly see how the wealthiest might have their taxes reduced, either as a percentage or in raw dollars, and still pay a greater share of the tax burden than the rapidly shrinking middle class. I can't help wondering how, even though the promised economic stimulus failed to materialize, tax revenue increased as both earnings and tax rates fell. Sounds like fuzzy math to me, but then, a very smart guy always said it was....

You really are a classic class warfare lib.....sorry about that.
The rich pay enough and higher taxes will not have the affect you assume they will. After GWB's tax cuts, the rich paid a higher portion of income taxes and tax revenue increased to record highs.
What does that tell you?
The rich pay enough and higher taxes will not have the affect you assume they will. After GWB's tax cuts, the rich paid a higher portion of income taxes and tax revenue increased to record highs.
What does that tell you?
If tax revenue increased so much while nonmilitary spending fell so much (both documented facts) then we were horribly misled by the cost of the Iraq war. Which makes statistics provided by those who misled us rather dubious.
What, for example, do YOU specifically mean by "the rich paid a higher portion of income taxes and tax revenue increased to record highs"? I'd like to see a source on the latter given we were in a series of recessions for most of Bushs two terms. With the increases we saw in unemployment I can certainly see how the wealthiest might have their taxes reduced, either as a percentage or in raw dollars, and still pay a greater share of the tax burden than the rapidly shrinking middle class. I can't help wondering how, even though the promised economic stimulus failed to materialize, tax revenue increased as both earnings and tax rates fell. Sounds like fuzzy math to me, but then, a very smart guy always said it was....

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
For Europeans who don't understand why Americans are against ObamaCare
03/09/2009 04:24:35 AM
- 1277 Views
I'd be happy to tax top "earners" more and suffer Europes economic "collapse. "
03/09/2009 04:30:31 AM
- 743 Views
The US will never work with socialism.
03/09/2009 04:40:21 AM
- 811 Views
Re: The US will never work with socialism.
03/09/2009 04:58:47 AM
- 798 Views
I don't think the mistrust of the government is really all that overblown
03/09/2009 05:04:34 AM
- 731 Views
It's advanced beyond what it was during the Revolution, I think.
03/09/2009 05:18:22 AM
- 769 Views
I would say it's grown with the government
03/09/2009 05:23:52 AM
- 753 Views
The key is that government shouldn't be heavily involved in personal lives.
03/09/2009 05:58:39 AM
- 780 Views
Re: I don't think the mistrust of the government is really all that overblown
04/09/2009 03:30:23 AM
- 695 Views
How much more can we really tax the wealthy??
03/09/2009 04:41:14 AM
- 659 Views
A lot; before Reagans "reforms" we already taxed them less than any other industrialized state did.
03/09/2009 05:06:00 AM
- 775 Views
I hear a lot of socialism coming from you.....
03/09/2009 05:19:08 AM
- 636 Views
Re: I hear a lot of socialism coming from you.....
03/09/2009 05:40:32 AM
- 722 Views
Nice non-answer answer.....
03/09/2009 05:52:04 AM
- 732 Views
You want detailed answers that require detailed data I don't have.
03/09/2009 06:06:55 AM
- 787 Views
Here are some facts and analyses.....
03/09/2009 02:40:22 PM
- 839 Views
The Heritage Foundation, huh?
03/09/2009 03:01:17 PM
- 843 Views

The non-working wealthy? Please quantify.....
03/09/2009 03:31:58 PM
- 808 Views
So you accept the CBOs assessment the House healthcare bill will be $1 trillion over the next decade
04/09/2009 03:02:13 AM
- 719 Views
You're so full of shit on this issue I don't know where to begin.
04/09/2009 03:15:55 AM
- 820 Views
Re: You're so full of shit on this issue I don't know where to begin.
04/09/2009 03:59:21 AM
- 907 Views
Less than 200 people were said to be US persons with Swiss accounts
04/09/2009 04:16:24 AM
- 708 Views
And yet account for many millions of dollars; what does that say...?
04/09/2009 04:21:57 AM
- 701 Views
It's statistically insignificant and your hyperbole is reminiscent of screaming guests on CNN.
04/09/2009 02:07:31 PM
- 636 Views
Well, look at this way:
04/09/2009 02:24:03 PM
- 766 Views
That's not a solution.
05/09/2009 02:39:12 AM
- 768 Views
The Soviets weren't socialist, or even communist, so it's a false comparison.
05/09/2009 03:09:06 AM
- 714 Views
Okay, now you've just gone into Kool-aid drinking territory.
05/09/2009 04:32:07 AM
- 834 Views
Communist THEORY is predicated on democratic participation at every level,totally absent in the USSR
05/09/2009 04:55:00 AM
- 954 Views
Ever heard of the 20-80 rule?
04/09/2009 04:28:54 AM
- 629 Views
Top earners? Please define.....what income and how much more? *NM*
03/09/2009 04:52:25 AM
- 498 Views
That would be open to definition, and should change with inflation.
03/09/2009 05:13:02 AM
- 886 Views
What is your justification for taking over 50% of anyone's income?
03/09/2009 05:28:22 AM
- 829 Views
That's a good example of why I say the rate has to be set to cost of living.
03/09/2009 05:50:16 AM
- 846 Views
Still no comment on the fact that 40% of Americans don't pay any income taxes?
03/09/2009 02:32:12 PM
- 766 Views
To what 40% do you refer?
03/09/2009 02:42:55 PM
- 631 Views
Dude, you are not making this easy.....
03/09/2009 03:38:01 PM
- 666 Views
No one "gets money from the IRS. "
04/09/2009 02:55:02 AM
- 675 Views
Actually with EIC you can get money back that you never paid in.
04/09/2009 02:56:43 AM
- 665 Views
It MIGHT be possible with the EIC, but in practice few people get more than they paid.
04/09/2009 03:43:36 AM
- 720 Views
I don't know, I've known plenty of people that have gotten more back than they paid in
04/09/2009 03:46:29 AM
- 798 Views
Yet another example of your ignorance on tax policy.
04/09/2009 03:19:39 AM
- 615 Views
The word I notice is "welfare"
04/09/2009 03:57:01 AM
- 733 Views
I wouldn't say that's what it means....
04/09/2009 04:02:40 AM
- 737 Views
It's what welfare means to me...
04/09/2009 04:32:17 AM
- 745 Views
I was just talking about EIC as a form of welfare, not welfare welfare. *NM*
04/09/2009 04:45:13 AM
- 426 Views
It's a credit for people who file a return on income that's been taxed.
04/09/2009 04:19:57 AM
- 673 Views
It is only for the WORKING poor, yes.
04/09/2009 02:12:55 PM
- 660 Views
Mean it may be, but hardly illegal.
04/09/2009 02:31:16 PM
- 687 Views
No real comments, just 100% agree with you....plus the $12 trillion is terrifying to me. *NM*
03/09/2009 04:33:39 AM
- 316 Views
Excellent post - the US government is not capable of running HC.....
03/09/2009 04:40:19 AM
- 616 Views
It depends on your level of cynicism
03/09/2009 05:38:53 AM
- 786 Views
when have they ever cut the fat?
03/09/2009 08:35:36 PM
- 711 Views
This doesn't make sense to me.
03/09/2009 08:33:18 AM
- 720 Views
The key phrase is "should be. "
03/09/2009 09:38:15 AM
- 886 Views
In fairness, most Europeans don't seem to realize what ObamaCare is.
03/09/2009 02:34:01 PM
- 761 Views
As far as most people I know are concerned, opposition to ObamaCare isn't the issue.
03/09/2009 11:04:36 PM
- 855 Views
It's hard not to be horrified with a government as wasteful as ours
03/09/2009 11:24:59 PM
- 628 Views
For Americans who don't understand why Canadians like their public healthcare.
04/09/2009 04:23:11 AM
- 743 Views
Correction
04/09/2009 04:44:32 AM
- 737 Views
Re: Correction
04/09/2009 05:05:11 AM
- 853 Views