Active Users:540 Time:10/06/2026 03:26:43 PM
I don't care about DADT, and I never mentioned it Brian Send a noteboard - 15/03/2010 07:15:27 AM
In fact, for the most part all Isaac and I have been saying is that the police were doing what is normal by notifying the base.

The only thing I've mentioned is that police reports and blotters involving military members are turned over to the base. Always. The police frequently call the base when there is an incident involving a member of the military and inform the military person's command. They did their job and followed standard protocol. There is nothing unethical or dickish about it, it's simply the way the system works. The military and the police work hand in hand very often in cases involving members of the military. If a member of the military isn't cooperating with the police, they will contact that person's command.

The only part of this that could remotely be "dickish" or "unethical" is if the information about the marriage license was included out of spite. As others have mentioned though, the marriage is a relevant fact in the case.

Would I put it past the police in SD to do it out of spite? No, I wouldn't. I'm from the area and I'm well aware of the fact that there is no lack of racism and homophobia in the area. So is it possible that they did it out of spite? Sure, it's possible. It's also quite possible that they were simply doing their job and sharing information with the base, as is common practice all over the country.

I have close ties to both the military and the police...to me this is all very cut and dry. To someone who has never been in the military and has never experienced the differences that that life entails it may seem out of place and unfair...but every member of the military is well aware that any incident involving the police is going to be reported to the base. It's something you learn to accept and live with. As an outsider looking in...I don't know, maybe it seems wrong...but as someone who has been on the inside, I understand the policy of the police informing the base, and think that it's very necessary.
Reply to message
Lesbian sgt. discharged after police tell military - 13/03/2010 10:43:06 PM 1111 Views
The military is entitled to know about all legal proceedings on its personnel, and the details - 13/03/2010 11:08:18 PM 591 Views
Re: The military is entitled to know about all legal proceedings on its personnel, and the details - 13/03/2010 11:37:30 PM 613 Views
well she did have a third option - 14/03/2010 12:05:06 AM 589 Views
Her marriage was an important detail - 14/03/2010 12:38:29 AM 581 Views
Re: Her marriage was an important detail - 14/03/2010 06:38:05 PM 596 Views
you're assuming the military are treated like actual citizens. - 14/03/2010 06:50:14 PM 560 Views
Basically. *NM* - 14/03/2010 06:54:14 PM 301 Views
really? I was really hoping someone would point out how wrong I was. *NM* - 14/03/2010 07:01:45 PM 317 Views
It's not as bad as it sounds *NM* - 14/03/2010 11:13:05 PM 286 Views
Agreed. It's restrictive at times, but usually fair. *NM* - 15/03/2010 12:30:13 AM 283 Views
Yep, definitely harsh, but also fair *NM* - 15/03/2010 12:54:34 AM 278 Views
Define fair - 15/03/2010 03:08:42 AM 559 Views
actually, I think it is as bad as it sounds. - 15/03/2010 02:14:21 AM 509 Views
Because if you treated soldiers like civilians, they wouldn't be very effective. *NM* - 15/03/2010 02:49:19 AM 283 Views
*shrug* I don't believe it has to be that way. - 15/03/2010 03:40:08 AM 509 Views
- 15/03/2010 10:28:32 PM 753 Views
Matter of perspective - 15/03/2010 03:13:21 AM 562 Views
*snort* there's "Rules" like any job has - 15/03/2010 03:34:51 AM 555 Views
Re: *snort* there's "Rules" like any job has - 15/03/2010 04:02:46 AM 577 Views
if someone is going to sign away their life and limb. - 15/03/2010 04:05:36 AM 655 Views
Re: if someone is going to sign away their life and limb. - 15/03/2010 04:48:03 AM 549 Views
very* - 15/03/2010 04:51:07 AM 630 Views
Re: very* - 15/03/2010 05:02:28 AM 535 Views
You can get out of the military anytime in the first six months or so without any consequences. *NM* - 15/03/2010 05:25:43 AM 360 Views
I'm less concerned about "Getting out" - 15/03/2010 12:31:49 PM 604 Views
Actually, in the contract when you first sign up... - 15/03/2010 05:55:48 PM 731 Views
as long as it's in the contract...and not glossed over. - 15/03/2010 06:00:38 PM 537 Views
The military is different - 14/03/2010 06:53:28 PM 682 Views
Re: The military is different - 15/03/2010 12:34:47 AM 539 Views
You obviously don't get it. There is no right to privacy as a member of the military. Period. - 15/03/2010 12:43:58 AM 523 Views
You two are arguing past each other - 15/03/2010 03:14:28 AM 510 Views
My point remains the same.... - 15/03/2010 06:27:32 AM 545 Views
No no no, I think you're missing a big point - 15/03/2010 02:50:33 AM 533 Views
Actually, I believe she also violated federal law too - 15/03/2010 03:38:26 AM 685 Views
Re: Actually, I believe she also violated federal law too - 15/03/2010 04:01:29 AM 564 Views
Jurisdiction - 15/03/2010 04:21:08 AM 601 Views
Aren't they already pursuing across state lines though? - 15/03/2010 04:46:34 AM 553 Views
and you are still missing my main point. - 15/03/2010 03:49:26 AM 558 Views
I don't care about DADT, and I never mentioned it - 15/03/2010 07:15:27 AM 567 Views
Wow...how completely wrong you are. - 15/03/2010 05:42:32 PM 510 Views
You want to cite when that was changed? - 15/03/2010 06:27:47 PM 565 Views
Marriage Question - 15/03/2010 07:26:34 PM 487 Views
Re: Marriage Question - 15/03/2010 07:54:24 PM 532 Views
I can't tell you when it was changed specifically... - 15/03/2010 09:09:46 PM 499 Views
Re: I can't tell you when it was changed specifically... - 15/03/2010 09:15:41 PM 526 Views
wait, why does this military have that right? - 15/03/2010 10:03:14 PM 508 Views
Why does or why should? *NM* - 15/03/2010 10:22:11 PM 288 Views
both, really. *NM* - 15/03/2010 10:28:36 PM 272 Views
Basically what snoop said *NM* - 15/03/2010 11:07:17 PM 258 Views
Can't cite you regs, don't know them and I have been out for a number of years now. - 16/03/2010 12:17:58 AM 478 Views
Re: Can't cite you regs, don't know them and I have been out for a number of years now. - 16/03/2010 12:33:33 AM 512 Views
Somebody brought up a valid point, though... - 16/03/2010 01:01:18 AM 617 Views
Re: Somebody brought up a valid point, though... - 16/03/2010 01:22:36 AM 665 Views
Does that mean you're backtracking on a number of your earlier statements? - 16/03/2010 01:35:49 AM 728 Views
Not really - 16/03/2010 02:07:36 AM 568 Views
Looks like you're missing one of my points too, then. - 16/03/2010 02:40:50 AM 859 Views
Re: Looks like you're missing one of my points too, then. - 16/03/2010 02:57:03 AM 552 Views
Actually she did NOT follow the rules - 14/03/2010 06:04:32 AM 598 Views
Bottom line: The law is stupid. - 15/03/2010 04:20:23 AM 538 Views
A spouse's criminal record can effect a soldier's clearance. - 15/03/2010 05:30:09 AM 651 Views
none? - 15/03/2010 12:36:36 PM 564 Views
Perhaps the bit where the police may have informed the military out of spite. - 15/03/2010 06:30:06 PM 599 Views
see and here's my thing - 15/03/2010 10:04:43 PM 688 Views
Re: see and here's my thing - 15/03/2010 10:45:10 PM 622 Views
i guess that's just me then I tend to tuck important documents into single locations - 15/03/2010 10:47:12 PM 596 Views
Until yesterday - 15/03/2010 11:34:09 PM 501 Views
Re: Until yesterday - 15/03/2010 11:42:37 PM 537 Views
Don't ask, don't tell is stupid and outdated in a modern country. - 15/03/2010 11:02:33 AM 550 Views
Exactly - 15/03/2010 09:04:44 PM 496 Views
Re: Exactly - 15/03/2010 10:11:14 PM 600 Views
Yeah, - 15/03/2010 10:43:10 PM 555 Views

Reply to Message