Active Users:376 Time:16/09/2026 02:13:39 AM
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM

Aran'gar (as Cannoli points out) isn't a transgender character in any deeper sense.

If anything their story arc is the process of in reverse. The character starts out "in the right body" and is then placed in one that they are completely uncomfortable with (to begin with).

The "punishment" in this case is the body/gender dysphoria that is the cause of many people to want to transition in the first place. I don't have especially great memory of Aran'gar and their thoughts about being dumped in a different body, so they might not be especially analogous to gender dysphoria (Cannoli, who undoubtedly has a better memory of the text than I do doesn't seem to think so) but that's certainly the more logical angle as far as I see it. Although given when it was written anything that is there is likely coincidental. If I was to hazard a guess I'd say it was more a exploration of RJ's kinks than anything else.

Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
This message last edited by TheCrownless on 13/11/2018 at 01:41:15 AM
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 973 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 670 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 705 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 638 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 661 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 428 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 667 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 592 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 648 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 662 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 675 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 640 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 818 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 660 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 659 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 665 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 687 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 655 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 644 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 643 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 638 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 313 Views

Reply to Message