Active Users:1125 Time:03/02/2026 08:56:20 AM
Because it is just contempt Roland00 Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM

View original post
Why the adult qualifier? Is the age of the individual a factor in whether one is "humanized" or not?

~Jeordam


Because it is just contempt, and contempt being expressed to another human being has so little benefits in human conversation.

Here, let the AEI president Arthur C. Brooks describe this point. (Well former president now for he retired this year in 2018 after a 10 year stint at running AEI, AEI is usually considered one of the two most important conservative think tanks in the US)

EKS, it starts with "Contempt conviction of the utter worthlessness of another human being"
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 876 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 574 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 608 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 560 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 563 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 379 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 573 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 509 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 547 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 575 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 588 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 550 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 707 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 563 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 565 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 569 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 582 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 558 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 552 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 537 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 546 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 264 Views

Reply to Message