Basically Beet called a lot of attention to the fact that he was strongly opposed to the Lynch of an innocent Townie Yesterday. Isaac and I then pointed out that it wasn't necessarily such a good thing, since it would behoove a DF to defend a townie they knew was going to end up dead without their help to make themselves look better by calling attention to it, not unlike Beet was doing. Then Beet started speculating on possible reasons for Napoleon's death, mainly centering around framing Isaac since Napoleon had said some anti-Isaac things Yesterday. Isaac then accused Beet of being overly defensive and then trying to subtly (or not so subtly) to accuse Isaac of evil by making comparisons between their behavior Yesterday. Isaac called out Beet's defense of F-T as displaying a level of trust usually not found in experienced players, which Beet countered by saying innocence was the most logical assumption to make. And Isaac also FOS'd Beet after he speculated that whomever had killed Napoleon had done so to make him look bad. Beet said that he just liked to talk really, especially when no one else was talking.

And that's about the long and short of it, I think. It kind of fizzled out when you brought up Hieshyn. Interesting. If I've got anything wrong, someone please say something.