Active Users:636 Time:18/12/2025 06:55:26 AM
Not a bad idea Isaac Send a noteboard - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM

Hm... but then it would probably just turn into a "OK. Who was cop first night. Who was cop second night?" and so on, and then any inconsistencies would quickly show a DF "Two cops claiming Day 2? Ok, one of you is a DF." And the cop(s) wouldn't have any fear of reprisal, because once their night is up, there's no good reason for DFs to kill them.


I tried something a little similar with the 'sheriff' role in game 8, it was an add-on, people voted to see who would be sheriff and that person had an extra-vote, it was designed to let the double-voter role get some air since we'd kept accidentally killing our double-voters. But it added - IMO, the players might not agree - an interesting layer to the game, since they might accidentally hand it off to a DF.

I sort of like the idea of shifting roles like cop around. I'd have to think of how to stick that into the a game, sometimes these things don't really game well, I've been trying to think of ways to have deathless games too, since I dislike killing people off, like just striking them from the vote count.

In this sort of case, you could probably rotate the cop, but the DFs would likely roleblock if they knew in advance and otherwise the cop just claims afterwards. 'Omnirole' is something I've kicked around, where people have a certain amount of 'points', which they can spend for certain actions, like you've got 50 points a night, a one-night vest cost 60, an investigation 50, a doccing 30, etc. You could really play around with that I tihnk, by randomly distributing what things each player can buy and for how much, say Player X and Y both have the option to cop, doc, and vig, but X pays 100 for a cop and Y pays 80, while Y pays 50 to doc and X pays 75, etc. Then Z might be able to track or watch only, but maybe pays less for it. You could give people an initial cache, with points accumulating each day, or no cache and lower you early death by NKs, or even set specific criteria that might give points, like 'X, every time a DF dies you get 50 points' and 'Y, you get 100 points a day, but lose 25 every time a townie dies, if you reach zero you die' which I think has the potential to really add a whole new level to the game, if it can be made simplified enough that newer players can absorb it and the normal rules fairly quickly. I could see someone gambling with their last points to NK someone, then falling over dead because they hit the wrong target.

I sort of like having everybody in a game have something more than vanilla, but you can choke a game if everyone has a role, so I sort of like the idea of a point-buy night action, because then you can distribute it around. You could really get some flavor if say, the standard DF template was NK and roleblock, and if DFs or masonic pairs could share points.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3691 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1458 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 908 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1534 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1425 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1602 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1406 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1573 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1449 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1509 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1493 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1379 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1468 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1461 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 1278 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 1350 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1407 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1446 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1438 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1406 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 878 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1413 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1369 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 1346 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1403 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1408 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1495 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1381 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1521 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1427 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1600 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1548 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1639 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 904 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 812 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1505 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 816 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 1280 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 772 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 905 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 822 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 824 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 826 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 793 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1478 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1426 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1361 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1384 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 1357 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1397 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 1246 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 853 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 829 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1527 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 1333 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1444 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 821 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1467 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 732 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 743 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1409 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1464 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 1320 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 770 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 1234 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1488 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1405 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1452 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1390 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1515 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 1333 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 830 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1729 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 818 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 843 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 809 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 1336 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 786 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1445 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1351 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1586 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 1347 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 762 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1365 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 823 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1417 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 712 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1508 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 1334 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 820 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1453 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1413 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1412 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1346 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 793 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1386 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1514 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 1346 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 757 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1594 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 1370 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 1280 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1432 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1595 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1544 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1510 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1455 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1384 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1562 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1366 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 1244 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 1270 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1382 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1460 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 1331 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1420 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 1306 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 1341 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1391 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 1325 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1392 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1521 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1391 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1366 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 1242 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1605 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1591 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1373 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 1295 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1461 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1571 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1468 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1419 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 1347 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 1335 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1650 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1405 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 1229 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1488 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1426 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1435 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 1243 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1528 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 1303 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1444 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1353 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 1358 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 1267 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1390 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1348 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1426 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1403 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1471 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 1354 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 839 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1328 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 1330 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1408 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 1298 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1422 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1391 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1386 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 833 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1400 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1426 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1465 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 880 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1377 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 1338 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1501 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1591 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1400 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1456 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1406 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1461 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1426 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1491 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 1345 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1389 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1425 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1472 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 841 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1405 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1425 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1433 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1505 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1389 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 1297 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 1312 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 1338 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1545 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1337 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1546 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 1325 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1357 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 1330 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 1137 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1497 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 1322 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1467 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1467 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1443 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 1211 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game... - 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM 1309 Views
That's true- I've said as much earlier in this thread - 20/02/2010 02:08:47 AM 1360 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 1298 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 1292 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1371 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 1343 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 1366 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1399 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1432 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 1360 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1513 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 1298 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1496 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 828 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 818 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 799 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 785 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1392 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1430 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 1355 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1352 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 1280 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1422 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 1314 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1378 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1406 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1442 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1410 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1427 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 1221 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 1343 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 1341 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 805 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 1257 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1390 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1476 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1490 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1541 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 1330 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1395 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 886 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1502 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1440 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1426 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 1295 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 1283 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 781 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1407 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 851 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 811 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1388 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1447 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1421 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 1338 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1430 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1441 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1440 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1555 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 1351 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1345 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 801 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1524 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1555 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1406 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1365 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1448 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1436 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1404 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1414 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1420 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1359 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1461 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1448 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1455 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1519 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1560 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1533 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1413 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1365 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1516 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1534 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 1326 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1475 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1367 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 1349 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1462 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 707 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 1328 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1444 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 701 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1470 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 1345 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1421 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 1337 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 1401 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 797 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1368 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 804 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 806 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1445 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 816 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 797 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1364 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1542 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1523 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 714 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1433 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1423 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1459 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1486 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1518 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1410 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1384 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1464 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 1343 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1434 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 1259 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1412 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 1314 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 828 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1450 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1586 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1346 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1406 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 1282 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 1348 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 1269 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1385 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1343 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 769 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 2140 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1504 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 2065 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 1344 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 787 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 1372 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 1351 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1486 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 1342 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 1290 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 1330 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1419 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 1335 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 1324 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1449 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1426 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 1329 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1438 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1473 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1494 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1390 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 1285 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1506 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 772 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 1310 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1389 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 785 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 888 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 1340 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1396 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1525 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1408 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1421 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 1329 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1411 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1339 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1387 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 1302 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 1259 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 1263 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 1322 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 1300 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 1269 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 1340 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1510 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1451 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1478 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1590 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 1244 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1365 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1482 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1351 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 1293 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1375 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 1316 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1421 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1428 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1445 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1462 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1521 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 838 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 833 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 751 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 790 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 717 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 843 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 784 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 892 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 771 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 799 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 797 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 1251 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1442 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 814 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 1248 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1559 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1498 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 1311 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1356 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1393 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1441 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1415 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 790 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 716 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 863 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1476 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1481 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1508 Views

Reply to Message