Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer.
snoopcester Send a noteboard - 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM
For a show called "Castle" the focus has been entirely too much on Beckett so much so that people are forgetting you can still have a show called Castle without her.
I imagine most people are well aware of that, they just like the show as it is - it isn't supposed to be a ground breaking show that only a few dozen people care about, it is a light hearted bit of fun based around Castle's interactions with the cops and his family that isn't taxing.
Anyway, with the suspense disposed of, why the hell was Castle a pallbearer?
You mean along with the three cops Castle works with and that Montgomery is closest to, owns the bar they hang out in after work, is extremely generous towards the force and has "handed over" Beckett (his protege who he feels duty bound to look after for his part in her mother's death) to?
I'm not saying this episode was not entertaining in the manner typical of Castle, but let's not get overboard about a couple of pieces of stunt-writing.
Ever get the feeling you miss the point... or that you work too hard to make sure you do?
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Ok, Castle was awesome. (no spoilers in my post, but the responses are dirty with 'em!)
- 17/05/2011 04:14:01 AM
1301 Views
*spoilers*
- 17/05/2011 09:46:02 AM
801 Views
Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* )
- 17/05/2011 01:59:12 PM
1037 Views
Yus!
- 17/05/2011 04:15:48 PM
842 Views
I should have read yours first.
- 18/05/2011 04:11:33 AM
778 Views
Nooooooooooooo! (spoilers)
- 17/05/2011 02:15:28 PM
889 Views
Eee. XD
- 17/05/2011 04:20:59 PM
726 Views
Re: Eee. XD
- 17/05/2011 04:58:59 PM
931 Views
Why is everyone assuming a death? Did I miss something beyond the contrived ending?
- 18/05/2011 04:06:37 PM
738 Views
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not
- 18/05/2011 04:44:45 PM
800 Views
But we know she's not going to die, so he's got a point. (+edit)
- 18/05/2011 06:16:20 PM
764 Views
Getting shot in the chest by a high-powered sniper rifle is not for the faint of heart
- 24/05/2011 10:03:12 PM
723 Views
Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer.
- 18/05/2011 04:35:04 PM
899 Views
Do you lack joy in your life?
- 18/05/2011 05:28:02 PM
979 Views
The difference between you & me is I'm mean to imaginary people, while you are mean to real people
- 19/05/2011 12:26:51 AM
746 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer.
- 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM
777 Views
To me, this seems eerily similar to Season of 3 of Bones, penultimate episode. (xpoiler for Bones)
- 20/05/2011 02:57:00 AM
745 Views