Active Users:408 Time:25/04/2024 08:43:53 PM
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. snoopcester Send a noteboard - 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM

For a show called "Castle" the focus has been entirely too much on Beckett so much so that people are forgetting you can still have a show called Castle without her.


I imagine most people are well aware of that, they just like the show as it is - it isn't supposed to be a ground breaking show that only a few dozen people care about, it is a light hearted bit of fun based around Castle's interactions with the cops and his family that isn't taxing.

Anyway, with the suspense disposed of, why the hell was Castle a pallbearer?


You mean along with the three cops Castle works with and that Montgomery is closest to, owns the bar they hang out in after work, is extremely generous towards the force and has "handed over" Beckett (his protege who he feels duty bound to look after for his part in her mother's death) to?

I'm not saying this episode was not entertaining in the manner typical of Castle, but let's not get overboard about a couple of pieces of stunt-writing.


Ever get the feeling you miss the point... or that you work too hard to make sure you do?
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Ok, Castle was awesome. (no spoilers in my post, but the responses are dirty with 'em!) - 17/05/2011 04:14:01 AM 1116 Views
*spoilers* - 17/05/2011 09:46:02 AM 620 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 12:50:51 PM 658 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 01:16:36 PM 639 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 04:22:16 PM 615 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 02:15:52 PM 637 Views
Nothing specific, sorry - 17/05/2011 04:17:09 PM 636 Views
Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* ) - 17/05/2011 01:59:12 PM 832 Views
Yus! - 17/05/2011 04:15:48 PM 659 Views
I should have read yours first. - 18/05/2011 04:11:33 AM 614 Views
Copycat! =^-^= *NM* - 18/05/2011 06:12:30 PM 287 Views
- 18/05/2011 06:46:11 PM 673 Views
Bah... - 19/05/2011 02:25:39 PM 877 Views
Stop that. - 19/05/2011 04:47:35 PM 535 Views
Re: Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* ) - 17/05/2011 07:05:02 PM 644 Views
Pfft - 18/05/2011 04:00:39 PM 619 Views
Right. - 18/05/2011 05:19:52 PM 734 Views
Agree - 19/05/2011 06:56:09 PM 581 Views
I disagree with you - 24/05/2011 09:58:48 PM 552 Views
Re: Pfft - 18/05/2011 06:47:08 PM 681 Views
Re: Pfft - 19/05/2011 06:59:30 PM 596 Views
Re: Pfft - 19/05/2011 07:26:24 PM 534 Views
Nooooooooooooo! (spoilers) - 17/05/2011 02:15:28 PM 708 Views
Eee. XD - 17/05/2011 04:20:59 PM 570 Views
Re: Eee. XD - 17/05/2011 04:58:59 PM 758 Views
Why is everyone assuming a death? Did I miss something beyond the contrived ending? - 18/05/2011 04:06:37 PM 565 Views
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not - 18/05/2011 04:44:45 PM 587 Views
But we know she's not going to die, so he's got a point. (+edit) - 18/05/2011 06:16:20 PM 597 Views
Yup. - 18/05/2011 06:51:16 PM 635 Views
Silly man. - 18/05/2011 07:11:38 PM 571 Views
Most definitely. - 19/05/2011 06:49:31 PM 597 Views
I really need to start watching it. - 17/05/2011 03:32:35 PM 528 Views
Yes, you do. - 17/05/2011 04:24:47 PM 612 Views
Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 18/05/2011 04:35:04 PM 711 Views
Do you lack joy in your life? - 18/05/2011 05:28:02 PM 794 Views
I think this is his joy. - 18/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 646 Views
- 19/05/2011 02:25:02 PM 788 Views
The difference between you & me is I'm mean to imaginary people, while you are mean to real people - 19/05/2011 12:26:51 AM 570 Views
Hardly, Cannoli... - 19/05/2011 02:18:36 PM 937 Views
Why you are wrong - 22/05/2011 04:03:57 AM 652 Views
*slow clap* - 24/05/2011 10:04:58 PM 601 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 18/05/2011 06:36:29 PM 612 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM 605 Views
It was good - 22/05/2011 01:12:14 PM 645 Views

Reply to Message