I think if you go back and read my response again, you'll find that I already answered your questions.
Umm, maybe I missed it, could you quickly answer it again.
I mean I recall that I talked to you about balefire before and asked you why for example Cadsuane could not just reverse Rand's death by balefiring Gawyn and essentially making it so that Rand had not died in the first place. Cadsuane would do it considering how utterly critical Rand is.
I think you answered that Cadsuane could not balefire Gawyn, because Rand&Gawyn would basically kill eachother and therefore Gawyn would be dead and no longer available for balefiring. Am I right? This is a good enough answer.
The question that has occurred to me is that since Rand KNOWS what balefire is and what it does, if Rand were to be critically injured by Gawyn, WHY would Rand retaliate at that point rather than just hedge his bet and let Gawyn go on living in the hope that Cadsuane or someone will hopefully hunt him down and balefire Gawyn and revive him that way.
The only answer I can see to this is that either
a)Rand is an idiot who ignores the possibility of Balefire "healing" him from Gawyn's attack. I would like to think that after his revelation at Dragonmount he will act smarter in the future and as such not be an idiot.
or
b)Rand and Gawyn will injure each other simultaneously the way Rand did with Ishamael at Falme. But this explanation is weak in that given how sickly&injured Rand is, I don't really believe that Rand is capable of such a feat anymore with someone as skilled with the sword as Gawyn.
So basically, I now wonder why is it that if your theory becomes true, Rand would not just let Gawyn go DESPITE the fact that Gawyn just killed so that Gawyn would still be alive and available for balefiring and therefore Cadsuane could bring Rand back from the dead.
Unless you think that Rand is still physically capable of matching Gawyn enough to kill him the same time that Gawyn returns the favor.
My new 'loony' theory
- 03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM
2534 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here...
- 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
1452 Views
- 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
1452 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though.
- 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
1623 Views
- 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
1623 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory....
- 03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM
1317 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan
- 03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM
1532 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory!
- 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
1489 Views
- 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
1489 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong!
- 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
1334 Views
- 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
1334 Views
In my view
- 04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM
1189 Views
Still prejudiced, of course...
- 04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM
1413 Views
Just disagreeing
- 04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM
1312 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence.
- 04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM
1337 Views
Well...
- 04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM
1183 Views
This is getting silly
- 04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM
1143 Views
Yeah, I think as well that we have sufficiently exchanged our views on this matter!
*NM*
- 04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
617 Views
*NM*
- 04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
617 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
- 03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM
1392 Views
cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM
1421 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM
1197 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM
1281 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM
1398 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM
1346 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line?
- 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
1289 Views
- 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
1289 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM
775 Views
now you're a cool kid again?
*NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
722 Views
*NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
722 Views
It was originally a comment on those who normally dwell here (and also did at Wotmania of course) *NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:25:17 AM
709 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
- 04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM
1378 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws?
- 04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM
1331 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand
- 06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM
1084 Views
Indeed he did.
- 06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM
1533 Views
But...
- 06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM
1336 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence!
- 06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM
1173 Views
Well...
- 06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM
1217 Views
*sigh*
- 06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM
1370 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea!
- 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
1327 Views
- 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
1327 Views
You won't.
- 06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM
1253 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic
- 06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM
1373 Views
Nice theory ...
- 07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM
1386 Views
Take two
- 17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM
1185 Views
Re: Take two
- 17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM
1210 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM
1253 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
1394 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM
1288 Views
