my first thought was it was Sammael or Graendal. Come LoC it was clear to me that it was Graendal.
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 09:44:38 PM
Thus, she fails the intuitively obvious-test
WHAT intuitively obvious test?
Jordan admitted years that was a joke, that he served at that Q&A the smart ass answer one of his physics teachers used to give his students when they didn't get a difficult problem. He admitted he was pulling our leg, and that he was enjoying it!!!
He even has contradicted the "intuitively obvious" joke elsewhere by saying there were some clues but no red flag. A red flag is slang for an obvious clue.... he said there were none!
The fact it's a joke aside, Graendal as a suspect is still perfectly obvious in TFOH. As the culprit (more than by a lucky guess) and in what circumstances no, but as a suspect certainly. It was even intuitively obvious to come up with the very simple theory that one of Forsaken allied with Rahvin was also in the palace, or came to the palace in the aftermath. I know for a fact it's an obvious reasoning to make because I bloody did it the first time I read that scene! So don't come and tell me Slayer is obvious and Graendal isn't! That's a totally ridiculous statement. NO ONE I've seen on any WOT website or newsgroup I've visited has brought up the theory that Slayer killed the BA in Tear or the Grey Men in the WT before WH revealed it! No one! So don't come and tell it's obvious Slayer did it because he killed before in the series.... It wasn't even obvious there was an executioner for the Shadow in the series, that Shadowspawn or a Forsaken didn't perform these deeds!
The closest someone may come to having Slayer as a suspect by intuition (not a pure guess, as your theory) is "hmmm.. maybe the person who eliminated the BA traitors in TDR also came to kill Asmodean". And that'd be a wrong reasonning because when you think this through by closer examinatiom of the text the circumstances of the death clearly indicated it wasn't an execution but a murder of opportunity, whereas in Tear it was an execution. So there's no obvious connection to make between the two events....
OTOH, it's perfectly simple to come up with possible reasons for Graendal and Sammael to have been in the palace and Asmodean stumbling on them by accident (ta'veren twist): they came to meet Rahvin and were very surprised to find the palace in an uproar and al'Thor apparently there - and remained around to find out what happened; they came for spies, they came to try to learn Rand's next move, they came to find out what happened because agents reported Rahvin's death, they came to check if Lanfear was now with Rand and had betrayed them all, they came to see if Rand was weakened enough by the duel they could take him out Etc., Etc. Some of these reasons don't stand the test of the next books and some do, but back in TFOH they were perfectly valid guesses that could come quite close to solving what happened. With LOC and ACOS, you can narrow it down some more, eliminate Demandred as another suspect, and Sammael, then Semirhage. And in those books and TPOD are the clues that the main remaining suspect, Graendal, seems to know something about Asmodean the others don't, and never something shows up that contradicted the notion she may have killed Asmodean. She had the means, she would have motives, and it's perfectly possible to reason out why she may have had the opportunity.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds
27/05/2010 12:12:50 PM
- 2587 Views
I hate to say it, as I love this mystery....
27/05/2010 03:01:08 PM
- 1334 Views
I have a theory on the killer that doesn't involve Slayer...
28/05/2010 03:41:23 AM
- 1137 Views
In addition to Etzel's comments
28/05/2010 09:08:45 PM
- 986 Views
I'm pretty sure the Myrdraal that killed Caradin's family was a Proto-version of SH *NM*
28/05/2010 09:56:58 PM
- 647 Views
Smacking & ordering Carridin, yes - but no evidence it killed his kin *NM*
29/05/2010 04:40:15 PM
- 612 Views
Re: Smacking & ordering Carridin, yes - but no evidence it killed his kin
29/05/2010 09:16:01 PM
- 1136 Views
Far-fetched, IMO
27/05/2010 04:01:05 PM
- 1428 Views
I don't want Slayer to be the killer
27/05/2010 04:33:06 PM
- 1124 Views
The way you twist things, it certainly seems so!
27/05/2010 05:07:22 PM
- 1221 Views
Bah, hogwash!
27/05/2010 05:17:37 PM
- 1089 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash!
27/05/2010 08:14:16 PM
- 1124 Views
The point is...
28/05/2010 08:38:49 AM
- 1165 Views
Yes, but Fain is a far cry from your average non-channeler
28/05/2010 12:01:44 PM
- 1217 Views
As is Slayer
28/05/2010 12:25:07 PM
- 1070 Views
There is no evidence of this at all
28/05/2010 12:32:37 PM
- 1050 Views
Yeah, the evil guys don't manage to harm the good guys
28/05/2010 12:38:57 PM
- 1025 Views
You always twist the quotes to make them say what Jordan didn't intend to say....
28/05/2010 02:20:09 PM
- 1115 Views
None of this explains how Slayer had opportunity that others didn't
27/05/2010 05:12:48 PM
- 1259 Views
We often see...
27/05/2010 05:33:19 PM
- 1116 Views
I just keep coming back to Slayer needs wild explanations while Graendal is more obvious
27/05/2010 05:52:13 PM
- 1196 Views
Indeed
28/05/2010 08:39:14 AM
- 1052 Views
Well...
28/05/2010 10:19:46 AM
- 1110 Views
Re: Well...
28/05/2010 12:20:15 PM
- 1115 Views
I adressed the points regarding the Fain-comparsion above
28/05/2010 12:35:08 PM
- 1054 Views
your Slayer theory is ridiculously complex!
28/05/2010 12:37:08 PM
- 1102 Views
It just requires to combine some clues from the first 5 books & some common sense
28/05/2010 12:44:10 PM
- 1047 Views
Re: Well...
28/05/2010 02:27:40 PM
- 1220 Views
No...
28/05/2010 03:04:41 PM
- 1141 Views
let's try this another way
28/05/2010 03:14:07 PM
- 1130 Views
The main problem with Graendal is...
28/05/2010 05:31:09 PM
- 1052 Views
Re: The main problem with Graendal is...
28/05/2010 09:20:27 PM
- 1192 Views
my first thought was it was Sammael or Graendal. Come LoC it was clear to me that it was Graendal.
28/05/2010 09:44:38 PM
- 1244 Views
RJ used the expression...
29/05/2010 08:17:08 AM
- 1033 Views
be careful ... your stretching far enough you might hurt yourself
29/05/2010 01:12:29 PM
- 1140 Views

Re: I don't want Slayer to be the killer
27/05/2010 07:47:40 PM
- 1088 Views
Couple of questions
27/05/2010 09:53:05 PM
- 1112 Views
Be'lal managed to get out NO!
27/05/2010 10:08:33 PM
- 963 Views
Hmmm
27/05/2010 10:27:55 PM
- 1085 Views
I don't think you can actually cut BF weaves
27/05/2010 10:45:34 PM
- 999 Views
Hmmm I wonder about that.
27/05/2010 10:58:46 PM
- 1054 Views
I think it would be impossible for someone to react that quickly
27/05/2010 11:13:01 PM
- 1153 Views
Of course you do. Trying to deny it is just silly. Everyone knows your bias. *NM*
27/05/2010 08:43:18 PM
- 560 Views
No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too
27/05/2010 09:08:48 PM
- 1103 Views
Re: No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too
28/05/2010 08:25:46 AM
- 1086 Views
But look...
28/05/2010 09:01:12 AM
- 1110 Views
if there are clues in TFoH I find it hard to believe that Slayer is involved
28/05/2010 12:29:40 PM
- 1009 Views
The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course
28/05/2010 12:32:13 PM
- 1076 Views
Re: The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course
28/05/2010 12:35:22 PM
- 1079 Views
RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM*
28/05/2010 12:40:23 PM
- 1136 Views
Re: RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM*
28/05/2010 12:52:30 PM
- 997 Views
Yeah, I know. *NM*
28/05/2010 02:51:32 PM
- 1068 Views
Yet Slayer is no where to be seen between his vanishing after TSR and the start of WH
28/05/2010 03:09:44 PM
- 1079 Views
???
28/05/2010 02:19:17 PM
- 1044 Views
Of course RJ implied that. You should read his quotes about Asmo! *NM*
28/05/2010 02:52:32 PM
- 1068 Views
Here is what RJ said EDIT
28/05/2010 03:29:19 PM
- 844 Views
Indeed
28/05/2010 05:18:35 PM
- 1008 Views
Re: Indeed
28/05/2010 05:26:38 PM
- 971 Views
But he was already introduced to us before the murder, and that is all that matters. *NM*
28/05/2010 05:33:02 PM
- 1021 Views
Re: But he was already introduced to us before the murder, and that is all that matters. *NM*
28/05/2010 07:05:27 PM
- 993 Views
Re: Far-fetched, IMO
02/06/2010 07:34:58 PM
- 1190 Views
Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? *NM*
02/06/2010 11:13:04 PM
- 680 Views
Re: Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot?
19/06/2010 12:59:54 AM
- 892 Views
Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken
19/06/2010 03:30:37 AM
- 1097 Views
Re: Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken
24/06/2010 09:03:18 AM
- 1301 Views
The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book
26/06/2010 02:32:26 PM
- 806 Views
Re: The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book
01/07/2010 10:13:53 PM
- 1228 Views
Lanfear killed Asmo.....
28/05/2010 05:05:55 AM
- 994 Views
Doesn't make sense
28/05/2010 11:09:14 AM
- 1036 Views
Sorry, Lanfear did it.....
29/05/2010 03:47:44 AM
- 966 Views
Considering that RJ didn't even necessarily want to reveal it, it was pretty random, yeah. *NM*
29/05/2010 08:25:54 AM
- 636 Views
Death is Moridin "when death took him"; need I say more
*NM*
28/05/2010 10:07:14 AM
- 680 Views

There is a quote that refutes this...
28/05/2010 10:22:12 AM
- 1078 Views
He could have recognized Moridan.....due to the True Power in his eyes.
29/05/2010 03:49:49 AM
- 1023 Views
No other Forsaken immediately recognizes Moridin as Ishy because of the saa. *NM*
29/05/2010 08:26:44 AM
- 644 Views
RJ failed, Etzel's analysis is sharp, and I'm gonna abandon the Asmo question forever
28/05/2010 08:55:01 PM
- 1102 Views
Re: RJ failed, Etzel's analysis is sharp, and I'm gonna abandon the Asmo question forever *NM*
28/05/2010 09:24:41 PM
- 736 Views
I think I found an RJ quote that kills the Slayer theory
29/05/2010 01:57:20 PM
- 979 Views
If Slayer is actually the killer...
29/05/2010 02:20:32 PM
- 1056 Views
Please, RJ would do as he always had and immediately RAFOd a question like that
29/05/2010 02:26:10 PM
- 1021 Views
Well, I don't think so.
29/05/2010 02:43:28 PM
- 1046 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer.
06/06/2010 05:44:05 AM
- 919 Views
If Slayer never met Asmo in the books he could not have killed him
06/06/2010 12:46:40 PM
- 918 Views

But Slayer could have met Asmo, when he was killed.. *NM*
06/06/2010 01:06:01 PM
- 976 Views
Directly contradicts what RJ said "they did not meet in the books"
06/06/2010 02:51:50 PM
- 927 Views
Not "before" the murder. *NM*
06/06/2010 06:03:34 PM
- 973 Views
Re: Not "before" the murder. *NM*
06/06/2010 10:25:16 PM
- 927 Views
He answers the question, if they met "before" the murder. *NM*
07/06/2010 07:18:50 AM
- 668 Views
not if it didn't happen in the books
07/06/2010 12:08:34 PM
- 864 Views
I think Asmo's killer was as surprised as he.
29/05/2010 09:26:03 PM
- 1046 Views
That's what I've always thought as well.
29/05/2010 10:06:56 PM
- 971 Views
You know, there's no direct proof suggesting that Asmo's killer was "surprised".....
01/06/2010 04:04:56 AM
- 956 Views
except the Author said it was a murder of opportunity
01/06/2010 11:13:14 PM
- 990 Views
That is simply false.
02/06/2010 10:00:27 AM
- 1051 Views
RJ stated it was a murder of opportunity ... I never said "only"
02/06/2010 11:49:23 AM
- 1101 Views
Of course, it is false
02/06/2010 12:13:11 PM
- 1020 Views
Here are the quotes
02/06/2010 12:39:29 PM
- 950 Views
As said, those quotes simply don't support that the murder was basically just an unplanned accident. *NM*
02/06/2010 02:14:29 PM
- 666 Views
I disagree. It's pretty much black and white that the opportunity/timing is the key factor to
02/06/2010 02:39:03 PM
- 879 Views
Actually I like it because it fits Slayer better than Graendal, as pointed out.
*NM*
02/06/2010 02:51:24 PM
- 527 Views

that makes no sense at all *NM*
02/06/2010 02:53:28 PM
- 719 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer.
06/06/2010 05:47:13 AM
- 1051 Views
Well...
06/06/2010 10:46:13 AM
- 1046 Views
Logic
06/06/2010 02:53:27 PM
- 1008 Views
You're falling into Etzelian logic there...
06/06/2010 03:25:30 PM
- 1000 Views

I'm just being a smartass
*NM*
06/06/2010 03:36:00 PM
- 692 Views

That's not anyone's logic, this argument is simply utter nonsense.
*NM*
07/06/2010 12:08:05 PM
- 1036 Views

just like thinking Slayer was the killer is
07/06/2010 12:09:34 PM
- 985 Views

Yeah...
07/06/2010 12:21:31 PM
- 1077 Views
thinking the top assassin killed someone when it's been stated over and over
07/06/2010 12:56:48 PM
- 1025 Views
Those quotes pretty much show that Graendal is careful...
*NM*
07/06/2010 01:03:26 PM
- 984 Views

No they show that she is deliberate!
07/06/2010 01:12:29 PM
- 1060 Views
That are just semantics
07/06/2010 01:36:12 PM
- 1137 Views
and you think it's obvious that Slayer was the premier Shadow assassin prior to WH?
07/06/2010 02:06:47 PM
- 1015 Views
As I explained you several times, I can see why RJ thought it is obvious, yes...
07/06/2010 02:17:01 PM
- 982 Views
Why wouldn't Graendal head to Caemlyn at that point?
07/06/2010 02:36:24 PM
- 1058 Views
And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin?
07/06/2010 02:54:33 PM
- 1111 Views

Re: And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin?
07/06/2010 03:01:14 PM
- 1072 Views

You should re-read the scene where Moghedien tells Nynaeve about it...
07/06/2010 03:12:55 PM
- 1058 Views
That's a different thing than Moghedien saying the plan was canceled
07/06/2010 03:15:32 PM
- 1143 Views
That is essentially what Moghedien said.
07/06/2010 03:33:35 PM
- 899 Views
um no it's not
07/06/2010 04:17:04 PM
- 987 Views
It's told after that...
07/06/2010 04:46:31 PM
- 952 Views
No it doesn't. It tells us that Rahvin, just like all the others had a side plan in place
07/06/2010 04:55:43 PM
- 1101 Views
Yeah...
07/06/2010 05:17:59 PM
- 1029 Views
Funny I feel the same way you do ...
07/06/2010 05:25:48 PM
- 1027 Views
Ah, whatever...
07/06/2010 05:35:22 PM
- 933 Views

We are on the exact same page
07/06/2010 05:42:48 PM
- 998 Views