Active Users:201 Time:14/06/2024 06:54:47 PM
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics Datakim Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM
Well, yes, you make a valid point, but it's been close to 1000 years since Luthair Pendrag leashed the first damane, or at the very least, several hundreds of years. In all that time, no one put two-and-two together and realized that sul'dam and damane run in families, however infrequently? It speaks of an incredibly close-minded culture, with a self-imposed thought police.


RJ said:

For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the “present day” sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.


In order for the connection to be truly noticed, it would have to happen quite regularly. Given those numbers, it is likely that damane being discovered is much rarer than I originally thought. It could be that the Seanchan realise that being sul'dam runs in families, but damane are likely so rare that even in a channeler family it only happens rarely. If your great-great-great-grandmother was a sparker, and you have a sparker as a child, you are likely not to make the connection.
Reply to message
Seanchan girls. Do they live in terror until 25? - 02/06/2010 12:32:14 AM 1341 Views
A few details to consider - 02/06/2010 01:11:12 AM 749 Views
Re: A few details to consider - 02/06/2010 02:31:08 AM 758 Views
Wasn't talking about breeding damane - 03/06/2010 03:32:44 AM 749 Views
Re: Wasn't talking about breeding damane - 04/06/2010 07:30:55 PM 618 Views
Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 02/06/2010 08:57:43 PM 579 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 03/06/2010 03:38:25 AM 458 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM 504 Views
Nobody knows about Sul'dam because it takes them extra long to learn. - 03/06/2010 07:58:41 AM 872 Views
Re: A few details to consider - 04/06/2010 07:33:39 AM 602 Views
I think it's seen as something that happens to other people. - 02/06/2010 02:20:09 AM 608 Views
I think they retest only the sul'dam - 02/06/2010 04:13:55 AM 785 Views
Re: I think they retest only the sul'dam - 04/06/2010 07:55:56 PM 592 Views
Point on the testing - 08/06/2010 02:15:26 AM 554 Views
Re: Point on the testing - 08/06/2010 02:46:06 PM 617 Views
Remember, Seancean have no idea channeling can be "learned" - 02/06/2010 07:04:11 AM 676 Views
This is how Damane and Sul'Dam are determined, straight from tGH - 03/06/2010 08:14:03 AM 877 Views
That doesn't make sense. Are you sure they don't put the BRACELET on the girls, not the collar? - 04/06/2010 01:35:08 AM 567 Views
I am absolutely sure. Quote from book. - 04/06/2010 03:09:08 AM 634 Views
Re: I am absolutely sure. Quote from book. - 04/06/2010 11:54:25 AM 528 Views
Thanks Darius *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:48:28 AM 319 Views
Toun, though too young can be collared - 06/06/2010 03:29:29 AM 516 Views
I don't think Tuon will ever Channel - 06/06/2010 03:39:16 AM 605 Views
Everything points to a change in policy - 06/06/2010 04:04:33 AM 534 Views
Re: Everything points to a change in policy - 06/06/2010 04:18:21 AM 431 Views
Re: I don't think Tuon will ever Channel - 06/06/2010 05:07:40 AM 540 Views
Not at all - 02/06/2010 03:52:31 PM 508 Views
Re: Are the new damane actually tortured? - 02/06/2010 06:56:10 PM 641 Views
I think "tortured" is relative... - 03/06/2010 08:22:37 AM 597 Views
As with most things in Jordan's universe, I don't think it was thought through very seriously. - 03/06/2010 08:05:04 PM 530 Views
Huh? - 03/06/2010 08:44:35 PM 617 Views
Sure - 03/06/2010 09:00:40 PM 622 Views
Bah... - 03/06/2010 09:51:09 PM 593 Views
Jordan definitely made mistakes with the Ajahs. In particular, the Black Ajah ones who fled. - 03/06/2010 10:56:39 PM 590 Views
oh come now - 04/06/2010 12:58:44 AM 515 Views
Re: Sure - 04/06/2010 04:55:23 AM 662 Views
I don't know if that's totally true - 04/06/2010 12:09:29 PM 521 Views
Maybe you don't read that much serious literature? I just don't see why you are arguing this. - 04/06/2010 03:47:50 PM 527 Views
I actually don't read much fiction at all to be honest - 04/06/2010 04:00:03 PM 548 Views
You're right about the fact that I have mostly contempt for Jordan. - 04/06/2010 05:42:49 PM 533 Views
meh. I prefer non-fiction most of the time - 06/06/2010 03:44:38 AM 566 Views
I have read lots of fiction - 06/06/2010 03:57:07 AM 560 Views
Meh - 04/06/2010 05:03:41 PM 544 Views
LOL ... I hear ya on that - 06/06/2010 03:49:48 AM 575 Views
We've seen so little of the old tongue how can you tell? - 06/06/2010 03:33:46 AM 437 Views
This raises another question - 06/06/2010 04:13:25 AM 501 Views
Re: This raises another question - 06/06/2010 04:53:42 AM 559 Views

Reply to Message