Active Users:459 Time:08/09/2026 10:49:21 PM
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics Datakim Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM
Well, yes, you make a valid point, but it's been close to 1000 years since Luthair Pendrag leashed the first damane, or at the very least, several hundreds of years. In all that time, no one put two-and-two together and realized that sul'dam and damane run in families, however infrequently? It speaks of an incredibly close-minded culture, with a self-imposed thought police.


RJ said:

For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the “present day” sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.


In order for the connection to be truly noticed, it would have to happen quite regularly. Given those numbers, it is likely that damane being discovered is much rarer than I originally thought. It could be that the Seanchan realise that being sul'dam runs in families, but damane are likely so rare that even in a channeler family it only happens rarely. If your great-great-great-grandmother was a sparker, and you have a sparker as a child, you are likely not to make the connection.
Reply to message
Seanchan girls. Do they live in terror until 25? - 02/06/2010 12:32:14 AM 1752 Views
A few details to consider - 02/06/2010 01:11:12 AM 1115 Views
Re: A few details to consider - 02/06/2010 02:31:08 AM 1120 Views
Wasn't talking about breeding damane - 03/06/2010 03:32:44 AM 1098 Views
Re: Wasn't talking about breeding damane - 04/06/2010 07:30:55 PM 971 Views
Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 02/06/2010 08:57:43 PM 966 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 03/06/2010 03:38:25 AM 787 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM 852 Views
Nobody knows about Sul'dam because it takes them extra long to learn. - 03/06/2010 07:58:41 AM 1275 Views
Re: A few details to consider - 04/06/2010 07:33:39 AM 977 Views
I think it's seen as something that happens to other people. - 02/06/2010 02:20:09 AM 985 Views
I think they retest only the sul'dam - 02/06/2010 04:13:55 AM 1160 Views
Re: I think they retest only the sul'dam - 04/06/2010 07:55:56 PM 955 Views
Point on the testing - 08/06/2010 02:15:26 AM 916 Views
Re: Point on the testing - 08/06/2010 02:46:06 PM 973 Views
Remember, Seancean have no idea channeling can be "learned" - 02/06/2010 07:04:11 AM 1070 Views
This is how Damane and Sul'Dam are determined, straight from tGH - 03/06/2010 08:14:03 AM 1859 Views
That doesn't make sense. Are you sure they don't put the BRACELET on the girls, not the collar? - 04/06/2010 01:35:08 AM 938 Views
I am absolutely sure. Quote from book. - 04/06/2010 03:09:08 AM 1011 Views
Re: I am absolutely sure. Quote from book. - 04/06/2010 11:54:25 AM 846 Views
Thanks Darius *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:48:28 AM 519 Views
Toun, though too young can be collared - 06/06/2010 03:29:29 AM 862 Views
I don't think Tuon will ever Channel - 06/06/2010 03:39:16 AM 1006 Views
Everything points to a change in policy - 06/06/2010 04:04:33 AM 911 Views
Re: Everything points to a change in policy - 06/06/2010 04:18:21 AM 800 Views
Re: I don't think Tuon will ever Channel - 06/06/2010 05:07:40 AM 872 Views
Not at all - 02/06/2010 03:52:31 PM 882 Views
Re: Are the new damane actually tortured? - 02/06/2010 06:56:10 PM 1029 Views
I think "tortured" is relative... - 03/06/2010 08:22:37 AM 976 Views
As with most things in Jordan's universe, I don't think it was thought through very seriously. - 03/06/2010 08:05:04 PM 895 Views
Huh? - 03/06/2010 08:44:35 PM 999 Views
Sure - 03/06/2010 09:00:40 PM 1034 Views
Bah... - 03/06/2010 09:51:09 PM 943 Views
Jordan definitely made mistakes with the Ajahs. In particular, the Black Ajah ones who fled. - 03/06/2010 10:56:39 PM 949 Views
oh come now - 04/06/2010 12:58:44 AM 907 Views
Re: Sure - 04/06/2010 04:55:23 AM 1051 Views
I don't know if that's totally true - 04/06/2010 12:09:29 PM 903 Views
Maybe you don't read that much serious literature? I just don't see why you are arguing this. - 04/06/2010 03:47:50 PM 889 Views
I actually don't read much fiction at all to be honest - 04/06/2010 04:00:03 PM 922 Views
You're right about the fact that I have mostly contempt for Jordan. - 04/06/2010 05:42:49 PM 899 Views
meh. I prefer non-fiction most of the time - 06/06/2010 03:44:38 AM 935 Views
I have read lots of fiction - 06/06/2010 03:57:07 AM 966 Views
Meh - 04/06/2010 05:03:41 PM 942 Views
LOL ... I hear ya on that - 06/06/2010 03:49:48 AM 963 Views
We've seen so little of the old tongue how can you tell? - 06/06/2010 03:33:46 AM 813 Views
This raises another question - 06/06/2010 04:13:25 AM 854 Views
Re: This raises another question - 06/06/2010 04:53:42 AM 938 Views

Reply to Message