I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense
Sidious Send a noteboard - 10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM
Or maybe you're trying to put a triangular block into a square hole.
It's a screwed-up half-ass magic system that has huge flaws in it. Amys can't do it properly, but we're expected to eat the theory that Barasine or Katerine can at a much later stage in the books when Egwene is getting really skilled and powerful. Sometimes I can't believe we give this stuff the time of day. It's clearly got huge errors in it.
All I know, Sidious, is that by my explanation, there are few holes in the OP strength issue, it matches what the author stated outside the books and seems sensible to me.
Your list is years old, never took RJ's bell curve statement into account, and shows some inconsistencies based on the text itself.
I've adjusted my list every time he's said something.
Your theory has enormous holes in it, but you didn't address them in the other post, or any of these posts. You got angry and stormed off.
If a woman sits at 50, then why does it take six to hold a man like Rand, and how can he break through 4. Are we to believe that a 100 man can break through a 200 shield? This system is utter crap if that's true, because no text supports it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount
- 10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM
2448 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking!
- 10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM
1378 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength...
- 10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM
1209 Views
See the question again man!
- 10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM
1184 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman...
- 10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM
1270 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing!
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1201 Views
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1201 Views
Think logically for a moment...
- 10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM
1036 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine?
- 10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM
1333 Views
Aviendha did in FoH...
- 10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM
1032 Views
Nope!
- 10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM
1211 Views
Your quotes are faulty
- 10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM
1196 Views
In what sense though?
- 10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM
1196 Views
Forkroot
- 10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM
1173 Views
Again... later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM
1021 Views
What do you mean?
- 10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM
1180 Views
See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM
1070 Views
Re: See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM
1133 Views
I just did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM
985 Views
Well then we disagree
- 10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM
1180 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT!
- 10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM
1004 Views
Ah, you mean later later ...
- 10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM
1114 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know?
- 10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM
1203 Views
Yes I know
- 10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM
1213 Views
I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM
1168 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM
1165 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM
1113 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM
1172 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine?
- 10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM
1205 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe?
- 10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM
1016 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ!
- 10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM
1120 Views
In that case, there is no problem...
- 10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM
1246 Views
But that isn't what the text says...
- 10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM
967 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then?
- 10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM
1250 Views
Yeah, both were RJ
- 10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
1081 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate.
- 10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM
1172 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1175 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1175 Views
Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM
1026 Views
Re: Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM
1166 Views
Here's what is clear:
- 10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM
1078 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove
- 10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM
1055 Views
Dude...
- 10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM
974 Views
At least we agree on one thing
- 10/06/2010 09:29:14 PM
1085 Views
yet 4 women can still hold Rand in LoC ... he can't break the Shield until it's down to 3
- 13/06/2010 12:47:43 PM
902 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point
- 11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM
1020 Views
The rate forkroot wears off?
- 16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM
1131 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all!
- 16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM
1025 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this...
- 10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM
934 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM
1043 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off...
- 10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM
1035 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield...
- 10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM
1028 Views
Easy...
- 10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM
995 Views
What has that got to do with it?
- 10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM
1181 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half..
- 10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM
1101 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who...
- 10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM
1219 Views
I can agree with that.
- 10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM
984 Views
...
- 10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM
984 Views
Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM
1141 Views
Re: Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM
941 Views
Good point...
- 10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM
1153 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list...
- 10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM
1006 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense
- 10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM
952 Views
Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM
963 Views
Re: Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM
960 Views
DUDE!
- 10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM
978 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily...
- 10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM
1626 Views
That's fairly simple, actually...
- 10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM
1201 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai...
- 10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM
1183 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM
556 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right...
- 10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM
1261 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages...
- 10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM
1006 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them...
- 10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM
1019 Views
Very poor evidence
- 10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM
1147 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined
- 11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM
1082 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined...
- 11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM
1128 Views
Here's the problem with that...
- 11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM
993 Views
I think you are misreading her.
- 10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM
973 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM
600 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution.
- 10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM
1177 Views
Yes. You can't extrapolate a generalized macro level scale to micro level individuals.
- 11/06/2010 12:16:24 AM
1038 Views
I don't agree
- 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
1026 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you.
- 10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM
1212 Views
Hmm...
- 10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM
951 Views
Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM
959 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM
1109 Views
Without contradicting the latter...
- 10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM
1013 Views
Ah well
- 10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM
988 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified!
- 10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM
1210 Views
Nope...
- 10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM
1082 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50?
- 10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM
1105 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55?
- 10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM
972 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys!
- 10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM
917 Views
Amys can't hold her properly
- 10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM
952 Views
What about later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM
966 Views
No she didn't
- 16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM
1090 Views
No she didn't what?
- 16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM
1130 Views
Re: No she didn't what?
- 17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM
977 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale?
- 16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM
1074 Views
That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM
1064 Views
Re: That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM
1013 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it.
- 16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM
1192 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body.
- 10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM
1045 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new
- 10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM
1145 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before
- 10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM
1231 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing
- 11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM
983 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing...
- 10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM
1252 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second...
- 10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM
997 Views
That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
1165 Views
Re: That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM
1029 Views
Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM
1121 Views
Re: Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM
1002 Views
God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM
969 Views
Re: God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM
1077 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM
1018 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM
1309 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility...
- 10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM
1157 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations.
- 11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM
1089 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM
1059 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM
1159 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
1133 Views
I agree
- 11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM
1223 Views
Re: I agree
- 12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM
1002 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out"
- 12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM
1053 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM*
- 13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM
573 Views
Actually she said "No"...
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
671 Views
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
671 Views
I'll rephrase then. It was about Maria saying that she considered giving a RAFO on the question.
- 13/06/2010 01:44:19 AM
1033 Views
Eh, practically useless.
- 14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM
986 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM*
- 15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM
539 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though.
- 17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM
1559 Views
