Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
DomA Send a noteboard - 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
Same with Cyndane's body. That they feel there's something worth holding back makes you abandon any thought of random body assignment
Why? Maria follows the forums and is perfectly aware there's tons of theories on Cyndane. That's why she hesitated to answer, though she finds the Cabriana theory so stupid (it's shot down in LOC itself - Cabriana's and Cyndane's descriptions were not a match) that she saw no harm in shooting down that detail).
They're holding back things like this because they're fully aware of how much the WOT community thrives on theories, and has been for years. For many of the WOT fans, it's half the fun. The more they give final answers in Q&A, the more they reduce the pool of theory topics or narrow down the possible answers, and a lot of the fanbase don't like that.
She won't give a final answer about Cyndane because she knows she's a huge topic of speculation, not because there's a reason to speculate about the origin of her body (mind you, by casually answering as she did, she indirectly confirms she's Lanfear, another question they refuse to answer when asked directly... because some people have this crazy notion that she's not Lanfear). By all evidence (ie: her northern looks), Cyndane's body is a random one taken from the Borderlands, like Halima's, like Dashiva's, and from the description too, Moridin's. Shaidar Haran said so straight out in LOC - that bodies for transmigration were the best suitable bodies taken from raids in the Borderlands. It's fans and not RJ who made a big mystery out of this: he gavce the answer right the moment the transmigrated Forsaken were introduced! We won't get an answer, because people have made a big deal out of it and turned this into a favourite topic of speculation, that's all.
As he explained in a Q&A, Brandon/Maria have a slightly different view about this than RJ did. Brandon more than RJ thinks there's no harm in shooting down the more far-fetched theories when he doesn't need to reveal too much to do so. He prefers to correct things when he sees people are grossly misinterpreting something. He doesn't enjoy seeing people having it all wrong particularly (and for his own books, he sets them straight). RJ did that too, but not a much lesser extent. RJ was in a different position too. Unlike Brandon who knows pretty much what he will and won't answer in the books - because on most issues it's not his choice and he only has a limited number of items on RJ's list marked "maybe" and a whole lot of 'leave unresolved" and "to resolve" - RJ liked to keep his options open. The details of the books were never set in stone, he couldn't be sure he wouldn't have an idea down the line to return to this or that detail left unexplained earlier. Fat lot of good it would have done them if he had already given away those details in Q&A. He started giving more answers about stuff he wouldn't use when he reached the final stretch, around KOD.
Brandon/Maria are more talkative than RJ (too much to many people's tastes, they've shot down a few popular theories), but also still refrain from shooting down theories that make sense, wrong or right. They wait for the series to end and people to see what gets answered and not.
They have an encyclopedia in the works that will answer a lot of the backstory and worldbuilding questions (OP etc.) too.
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount
- 10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM
2547 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking!
- 10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM
1475 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength...
- 10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM
1293 Views
See the question again man!
- 10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM
1278 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman...
- 10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM
1344 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing!
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1284 Views
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1284 Views
Think logically for a moment...
- 10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM
1106 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine?
- 10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM
1413 Views
Aviendha did in FoH...
- 10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM
1105 Views
Nope!
- 10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM
1295 Views
Your quotes are faulty
- 10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM
1280 Views
In what sense though?
- 10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM
1326 Views
Forkroot
- 10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM
1263 Views
Again... later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM
1107 Views
What do you mean?
- 10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM
1260 Views
See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM
1150 Views
Re: See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM
1217 Views
I just did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM
1078 Views
Well then we disagree
- 10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM
1258 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT!
- 10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM
1092 Views
Ah, you mean later later ...
- 10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM
1191 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know?
- 10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM
1281 Views
Yes I know
- 10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM
1280 Views
I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM
1243 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM
1253 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM
1184 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM
1248 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine?
- 10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM
1274 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe?
- 10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM
1092 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ!
- 10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM
1232 Views
In that case, there is no problem...
- 10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM
1333 Views
But that isn't what the text says...
- 10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM
1055 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then?
- 10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM
1332 Views
Yeah, both were RJ
- 10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
1155 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate.
- 10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM
1259 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1275 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1275 Views
Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM
1096 Views
Re: Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM
1251 Views
Here's what is clear:
- 10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM
1146 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove
- 10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM
1125 Views
Dude...
- 10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM
1068 Views
At least we agree on one thing
- 10/06/2010 09:29:14 PM
1169 Views
yet 4 women can still hold Rand in LoC ... he can't break the Shield until it's down to 3
- 13/06/2010 12:47:43 PM
974 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point
- 11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM
1101 Views
The rate forkroot wears off?
- 16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM
1233 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all!
- 16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM
1102 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this...
- 10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM
1008 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM
1111 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off...
- 10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM
1112 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield...
- 10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM
1102 Views
Easy...
- 10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM
1074 Views
What has that got to do with it?
- 10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM
1270 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half..
- 10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM
1190 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who...
- 10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM
1300 Views
I can agree with that.
- 10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM
1081 Views
...
- 10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM
1061 Views
Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM
1226 Views
Re: Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM
1019 Views
Good point...
- 10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM
1239 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list...
- 10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM
1089 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense
- 10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM
1050 Views
Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM
1045 Views
Re: Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM
1038 Views
DUDE!
- 10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM
1072 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily...
- 10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM
1702 Views
That's fairly simple, actually...
- 10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM
1287 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai...
- 10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM
1263 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM
598 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right...
- 10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM
1344 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages...
- 10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM
1085 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them...
- 10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM
1097 Views
Very poor evidence
- 10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM
1252 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined
- 11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM
1162 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined...
- 11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM
1212 Views
Here's the problem with that...
- 11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM
1083 Views
I think you are misreading her.
- 10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM
1051 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM
656 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution.
- 10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM
1252 Views
Yes. You can't extrapolate a generalized macro level scale to micro level individuals.
- 11/06/2010 12:16:24 AM
1127 Views
I don't agree
- 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
1110 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you.
- 10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM
1319 Views
Hmm...
- 10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM
1040 Views
Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM
1028 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM
1189 Views
Without contradicting the latter...
- 10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM
1096 Views
Ah well
- 10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM
1068 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified!
- 10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM
1287 Views
Nope...
- 10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM
1160 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50?
- 10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM
1195 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55?
- 10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM
1067 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys!
- 10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM
993 Views
Amys can't hold her properly
- 10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM
1022 Views
What about later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM
1054 Views
No she didn't
- 16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM
1161 Views
No she didn't what?
- 16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM
1262 Views
Re: No she didn't what?
- 17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM
1060 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale?
- 16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM
1173 Views
That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM
1146 Views
Re: That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM
1119 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it.
- 16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM
1273 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body.
- 10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM
1137 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new
- 10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM
1219 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before
- 10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM
1302 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing
- 11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM
1063 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing...
- 10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM
1323 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second...
- 10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM
1078 Views
That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
1249 Views
Re: That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM
1112 Views
Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM
1207 Views
Re: Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM
1090 Views
God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM
1047 Views
Re: God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM
1147 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM
1085 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM
1407 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility...
- 10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM
1226 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations.
- 11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM
1163 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM
1154 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM
1238 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
1212 Views
I agree
- 11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM
1309 Views
Re: I agree
- 12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM
1073 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out"
- 12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM
1125 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM*
- 13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM
616 Views
Actually she said "No"...
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
720 Views
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
720 Views
I'll rephrase then. It was about Maria saying that she considered giving a RAFO on the question.
- 13/06/2010 01:44:19 AM
1117 Views
Eh, practically useless.
- 14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM
1056 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM*
- 15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM
581 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though.
- 17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM
1645 Views
