Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
DomA Send a noteboard - 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
Same with Cyndane's body. That they feel there's something worth holding back makes you abandon any thought of random body assignment
Why? Maria follows the forums and is perfectly aware there's tons of theories on Cyndane. That's why she hesitated to answer, though she finds the Cabriana theory so stupid (it's shot down in LOC itself - Cabriana's and Cyndane's descriptions were not a match) that she saw no harm in shooting down that detail).
They're holding back things like this because they're fully aware of how much the WOT community thrives on theories, and has been for years. For many of the WOT fans, it's half the fun. The more they give final answers in Q&A, the more they reduce the pool of theory topics or narrow down the possible answers, and a lot of the fanbase don't like that.
She won't give a final answer about Cyndane because she knows she's a huge topic of speculation, not because there's a reason to speculate about the origin of her body (mind you, by casually answering as she did, she indirectly confirms she's Lanfear, another question they refuse to answer when asked directly... because some people have this crazy notion that she's not Lanfear). By all evidence (ie: her northern looks), Cyndane's body is a random one taken from the Borderlands, like Halima's, like Dashiva's, and from the description too, Moridin's. Shaidar Haran said so straight out in LOC - that bodies for transmigration were the best suitable bodies taken from raids in the Borderlands. It's fans and not RJ who made a big mystery out of this: he gavce the answer right the moment the transmigrated Forsaken were introduced! We won't get an answer, because people have made a big deal out of it and turned this into a favourite topic of speculation, that's all.
As he explained in a Q&A, Brandon/Maria have a slightly different view about this than RJ did. Brandon more than RJ thinks there's no harm in shooting down the more far-fetched theories when he doesn't need to reveal too much to do so. He prefers to correct things when he sees people are grossly misinterpreting something. He doesn't enjoy seeing people having it all wrong particularly (and for his own books, he sets them straight). RJ did that too, but not a much lesser extent. RJ was in a different position too. Unlike Brandon who knows pretty much what he will and won't answer in the books - because on most issues it's not his choice and he only has a limited number of items on RJ's list marked "maybe" and a whole lot of 'leave unresolved" and "to resolve" - RJ liked to keep his options open. The details of the books were never set in stone, he couldn't be sure he wouldn't have an idea down the line to return to this or that detail left unexplained earlier. Fat lot of good it would have done them if he had already given away those details in Q&A. He started giving more answers about stuff he wouldn't use when he reached the final stretch, around KOD.
Brandon/Maria are more talkative than RJ (too much to many people's tastes, they've shot down a few popular theories), but also still refrain from shooting down theories that make sense, wrong or right. They wait for the series to end and people to see what gets answered and not.
They have an encyclopedia in the works that will answer a lot of the backstory and worldbuilding questions (OP etc.) too.
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount
- 10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM
2580 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking!
- 10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM
1508 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength...
- 10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM
1314 Views
See the question again man!
- 10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM
1297 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman...
- 10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM
1370 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing!
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1303 Views
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1303 Views
Think logically for a moment...
- 10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM
1130 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine?
- 10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM
1433 Views
Aviendha did in FoH...
- 10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM
1130 Views
Nope!
- 10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM
1319 Views
Your quotes are faulty
- 10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM
1302 Views
In what sense though?
- 10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM
1352 Views
Forkroot
- 10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM
1299 Views
Again... later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM
1136 Views
What do you mean?
- 10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM
1290 Views
See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM
1173 Views
Re: See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM
1233 Views
I just did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM
1123 Views
Well then we disagree
- 10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM
1280 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT!
- 10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM
1117 Views
Ah, you mean later later ...
- 10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM
1212 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know?
- 10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM
1300 Views
Yes I know
- 10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM
1309 Views
I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM
1263 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM
1286 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM
1209 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM
1270 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine?
- 10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM
1297 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe?
- 10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM
1110 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ!
- 10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM
1287 Views
In that case, there is no problem...
- 10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM
1361 Views
But that isn't what the text says...
- 10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM
1082 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then?
- 10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM
1356 Views
Yeah, both were RJ
- 10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
1178 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate.
- 10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM
1287 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1299 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1299 Views
Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM
1137 Views
Re: Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM
1276 Views
Here's what is clear:
- 10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM
1172 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove
- 10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM
1147 Views
Dude...
- 10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM
1086 Views
At least we agree on one thing
- 10/06/2010 09:29:14 PM
1191 Views
yet 4 women can still hold Rand in LoC ... he can't break the Shield until it's down to 3
- 13/06/2010 12:47:43 PM
1001 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point
- 11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM
1127 Views
The rate forkroot wears off?
- 16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM
1277 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all!
- 16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM
1124 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this...
- 10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM
1034 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM
1137 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off...
- 10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM
1154 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield...
- 10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM
1126 Views
Easy...
- 10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM
1097 Views
What has that got to do with it?
- 10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM
1300 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half..
- 10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM
1213 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who...
- 10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM
1326 Views
I can agree with that.
- 10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM
1102 Views
...
- 10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM
1085 Views
Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM
1251 Views
Re: Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM
1040 Views
Good point...
- 10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM
1262 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list...
- 10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM
1110 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense
- 10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM
1082 Views
Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM
1060 Views
Re: Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM
1063 Views
DUDE!
- 10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM
1099 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily...
- 10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM
1726 Views
That's fairly simple, actually...
- 10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM
1324 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai...
- 10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM
1286 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM
611 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right...
- 10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM
1370 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages...
- 10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM
1109 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them...
- 10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM
1125 Views
Very poor evidence
- 10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM
1285 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined
- 11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM
1191 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined...
- 11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM
1249 Views
Here's the problem with that...
- 11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM
1105 Views
I think you are misreading her.
- 10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM
1077 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM
668 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution.
- 10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM
1277 Views
Yes. You can't extrapolate a generalized macro level scale to micro level individuals.
- 11/06/2010 12:16:24 AM
1152 Views
I don't agree
- 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
1142 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you.
- 10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM
1347 Views
Hmm...
- 10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM
1080 Views
Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM
1050 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM
1207 Views
Without contradicting the latter...
- 10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM
1120 Views
Ah well
- 10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM
1094 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified!
- 10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM
1312 Views
Nope...
- 10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM
1180 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50?
- 10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM
1217 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55?
- 10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM
1093 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys!
- 10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM
1017 Views
Amys can't hold her properly
- 10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM
1041 Views
What about later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM
1081 Views
No she didn't
- 16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM
1185 Views
No she didn't what?
- 16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM
1315 Views
Re: No she didn't what?
- 17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM
1079 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale?
- 16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM
1205 Views
That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM
1186 Views
Re: That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM
1146 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it.
- 16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM
1293 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body.
- 10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM
1174 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new
- 10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM
1243 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before
- 10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM
1326 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing
- 11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM
1087 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing...
- 10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM
1345 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second...
- 10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM
1102 Views
That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
1282 Views
Re: That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM
1135 Views
Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM
1250 Views
Re: Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM
1119 Views
God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM
1070 Views
Re: God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM
1168 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM
1112 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM
1439 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility...
- 10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM
1246 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations.
- 11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM
1183 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM
1193 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM
1265 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
1234 Views
I agree
- 11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM
1328 Views
Re: I agree
- 12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM
1098 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out"
- 12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM
1146 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM*
- 13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM
629 Views
Actually she said "No"...
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
735 Views
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
735 Views
I'll rephrase then. It was about Maria saying that she considered giving a RAFO on the question.
- 13/06/2010 01:44:19 AM
1134 Views
Eh, practically useless.
- 14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM
1076 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM*
- 15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM
594 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though.
- 17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM
1664 Views
