Dude, I can't believe you think this. So you think that RJ was putting in a falsehood about female strength to show how inexperienced Elayne is? That is mad IMO.
Dude, are you thinking before you're typing? It isn't a falsehood. It is RJ ensuring that Elayne doesn't have information that is over and above what she should know, given her experience.
For example, the Aes Sedai think Sharina is as strong as a woman can get. We know this isn't true. Is RJ making the Aes Sedai lie, or is he making them say things based on their experience?
How do you equate sneaking up and shielding someone, with Egwene having the Power to match two strong women directly? What happened when Nynaeve got free... the two linked Sisters lost. That's what Aviendha was saying, and Nynaeve at least, proved it.
And how did they lose the duel? Because Nynaeve convinced the Kin to help her. She was helpless before that. If you seriously think wouldn't have been able to break a shield that is of total strength 30 at most, then I don't know what to say to you. Continue in your delusions, I guess.
1. Nynaeve has shown more than once that Shielding isn't a strong skill for her. She could be one of those like Asmo who just doesn't have much ability in this area.
2. Lan was actually how Nynaeve got out of this, and it seems unlikely the Kin did much in the way of fighting since they were still terrified of Ispan only moments later, not to mention Falion managed to escape which would have been unlikely if the Kin had joined in.
3. I actually think women can shield other women far more easily than they can men. Take Sheraine/Mylen, she held 3 shields on Joline, Teslyn and Edesina... clearly she's not vastly stronger than any of those women, but she was able to manage it. Then there is Cadsuane's thoughts on 3 women (non particularly strong) being able to hold Semirhage, "taking no chances".
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount
- 10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM
2512 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking!
- 10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM
1446 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength...
- 10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM
1279 Views
See the question again man!
- 10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM
1266 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman...
- 10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM
1331 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing!
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1274 Views
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1274 Views
Think logically for a moment...
- 10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM
1095 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine?
- 10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM
1400 Views
Aviendha did in FoH...
- 10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM
1095 Views
Nope!
- 10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM
1274 Views
Your quotes are faulty
- 10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM
1270 Views
In what sense though?
- 10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM
1291 Views
Forkroot
- 10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM
1245 Views
Again... later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM
1092 Views
What do you mean?
- 10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM
1242 Views
See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM
1138 Views
Re: See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM
1201 Views
I just did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM
1053 Views
Well then we disagree
- 10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM
1245 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT!
- 10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM
1081 Views
Ah, you mean later later ...
- 10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM
1176 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know?
- 10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM
1270 Views
Yes I know
- 10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM
1267 Views
I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM
1230 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM
1226 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM
1172 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM
1237 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine?
- 10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM
1264 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe?
- 10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM
1080 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ!
- 10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM
1201 Views
In that case, there is no problem...
- 10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM
1317 Views
But that isn't what the text says...
- 10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM
1025 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then?
- 10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM
1317 Views
Yeah, both were RJ
- 10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
1144 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate.
- 10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM
1241 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1252 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1252 Views
Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM
1084 Views
Re: Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM
1237 Views
Here's what is clear:
- 10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM
1135 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove
- 10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM
1116 Views
Dude...
- 10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM
1057 Views
yet 4 women can still hold Rand in LoC ... he can't break the Shield until it's down to 3
- 13/06/2010 12:47:43 PM
965 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point
- 11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM
1093 Views
The rate forkroot wears off?
- 16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM
1201 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all!
- 16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM
1091 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this...
- 10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM
994 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM
1100 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off...
- 10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM
1102 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield...
- 10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM
1093 Views
Easy...
- 10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM
1063 Views
What has that got to do with it?
- 10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM
1243 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half..
- 10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM
1165 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who...
- 10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM
1290 Views
I can agree with that.
- 10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM
1053 Views
...
- 10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM
1048 Views
Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM
1210 Views
Re: Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM
1008 Views
Good point...
- 10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM
1219 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list...
- 10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM
1077 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense
- 10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM
1022 Views
Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM
1033 Views
Re: Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM
1020 Views
DUDE!
- 10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM
1044 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily...
- 10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM
1692 Views
That's fairly simple, actually...
- 10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM
1272 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai...
- 10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM
1245 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM
592 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right...
- 10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM
1331 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages...
- 10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM
1077 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them...
- 10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM
1085 Views
Very poor evidence
- 10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM
1212 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined
- 11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM
1152 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined...
- 11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM
1188 Views
Here's the problem with that...
- 11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM
1057 Views
I think you are misreading her.
- 10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM
1037 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM
635 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution.
- 10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM
1243 Views
Yes. You can't extrapolate a generalized macro level scale to micro level individuals.
- 11/06/2010 12:16:24 AM
1110 Views
I don't agree
- 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
1094 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you.
- 10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM
1281 Views
Hmm...
- 10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM
1010 Views
Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM
1016 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM
1176 Views
Without contradicting the latter...
- 10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM
1083 Views
Ah well
- 10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM
1052 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified!
- 10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM
1276 Views
Nope...
- 10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM
1148 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50?
- 10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM
1183 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55?
- 10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM
1042 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys!
- 10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM
985 Views
Amys can't hold her properly
- 10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM
1010 Views
What about later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM
1040 Views
No she didn't
- 16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM
1150 Views
No she didn't what?
- 16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM
1232 Views
Re: No she didn't what?
- 17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM
1049 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale?
- 16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM
1156 Views
That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM
1132 Views
Re: That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM
1088 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it.
- 16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM
1258 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body.
- 10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM
1110 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new
- 10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM
1209 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before
- 10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM
1293 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing
- 11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM
1052 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing...
- 10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM
1310 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second...
- 10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM
1067 Views
That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
1233 Views
Re: That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM
1094 Views
Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM
1185 Views
Re: Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM
1081 Views
God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM
1035 Views
Re: God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM
1135 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM
1076 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM
1392 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility...
- 10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM
1215 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations.
- 11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM
1152 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM
1119 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM
1227 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
1198 Views
I agree
- 11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM
1298 Views
Re: I agree
- 12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM
1063 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out"
- 12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM
1113 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM*
- 13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM
609 Views
Actually she said "No"...
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
710 Views
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
710 Views
I'll rephrase then. It was about Maria saying that she considered giving a RAFO on the question.
- 13/06/2010 01:44:19 AM
1103 Views
Eh, practically useless.
- 14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM
1045 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM*
- 15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM
575 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though.
- 17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM
1635 Views
