In my books, if you can't shield someone (because the other one is so strong, or because your weave is so weak it can be cut, or anything else) it means you can't shield someone. Period.
When Verin tried to shield Graendal in WH, her shield simply bounces off. Graendal had to do nothing to counter it, her strength was enough.
With Rand and Lanfear, Lanfear's shield was strong enough to cut him off, but he cut her shield. Had he failed to do so, she would have shielded him.
No three women could block him from the Source...
- 15/06/2010 06:52:17 PM
2229 Views
I think that is total BS, since the books have proved otherwise more than once...
- 15/06/2010 07:22:16 PM
1300 Views
I think he means that it would take three such women to smother him
- 15/06/2010 07:45:03 PM
1379 Views
Re: I think that is total BS, since the books have proved otherwise more than once...
- 15/06/2010 08:17:47 PM
1311 Views
Huh?
- 15/06/2010 08:19:21 PM
1411 Views
Re: Huh?
- 15/06/2010 08:31:17 PM
1240 Views
- 15/06/2010 08:43:12 PM
1305 Views
- 15/06/2010 08:43:12 PM
1305 Views
Re:
- 15/06/2010 08:47:05 PM
1146 Views
- 15/06/2010 08:47:05 PM
1146 Views
No, this is before.
- 15/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
1229 Views
Well that's a different quote from the one you used before, and this one shows Lanfear not succeedin
- 15/06/2010 08:52:00 PM
1218 Views
I never used a quote before. And there's no quote where Lanfear's shield is not succeeding.
- 15/06/2010 08:52:28 PM
1095 Views
Simple answer to settle it:
- 15/06/2010 09:00:22 PM
1148 Views
So Talaan is God?
- 15/06/2010 09:04:44 PM
1305 Views
It Rand had half Lews Therin's skill at the time, she would stand no chance..SKILL was her advantage
- 15/06/2010 09:08:41 PM
1217 Views
So?
- 15/06/2010 09:15:01 PM
1177 Views
Nope, YOU said he was talking about smothering him, whatever that's supposed to mean...
- 15/06/2010 09:26:53 PM
1177 Views
You do know that this was AFTER Lanfear had picked up the bracelet angreal, right?
- 15/06/2010 08:49:47 PM
1228 Views
It was before... both of them start using an angreal after this.
- 15/06/2010 08:52:02 PM
1126 Views
Nope. 6 Aes Sedai couldn't take Raolain Darksbane or Yurian Stonebow...Semirhage = 3 Aes Sedai
- 15/06/2010 08:26:21 PM
1188 Views
Lanfear can do it alone
- 15/06/2010 08:45:09 PM
1171 Views
She ATTEMPTS to cut him off, when he is not at full strength or full training yet...
- 15/06/2010 08:55:39 PM
1122 Views
Plus, Rand was splitting his flows, IIRC. Meaning he wasn't 100% one-on-one with her.
- 15/06/2010 08:57:35 PM
1180 Views
She was splitting her flows too... she was slicing his weaves of Air.
- 15/06/2010 08:59:00 PM
1172 Views
Bah!
- 15/06/2010 08:58:26 PM
1181 Views
I repeat: You cannot shield someone unless you are significantly stronger than they are...
- 15/06/2010 09:02:55 PM
1104 Views
Explain Talaan shielding Nynaeve then. Or the two BA shielding her.
- 15/06/2010 09:05:21 PM
2093 Views
It becomes a battle of skill then...
- 15/06/2010 09:09:42 PM
1266 Views
Then by your own definition you do not have to be significantly stronger to shield someone
- 15/06/2010 11:28:44 PM
1150 Views
Re: "he would have had no need to cut her weaves"
- 15/06/2010 09:03:39 PM
1110 Views
No. There's a difference.
- 15/06/2010 09:07:09 PM
1300 Views
Oh come on...
- 15/06/2010 08:48:56 PM
1301 Views
I know you are not that ignorant...
- 15/06/2010 09:07:02 PM
1103 Views
But that isn't true...
- 15/06/2010 09:10:37 PM
1135 Views
Let me spell it out for you...
- 15/06/2010 09:18:04 PM
1168 Views
Re: Let me spell it out for you...
- 15/06/2010 09:21:02 PM
1176 Views
+1. It ridiculous comparison. Rand even didn't know how to shield a woman.
- 15/06/2010 09:22:22 PM
1148 Views
Now that's a ridiculous comparison
- 15/06/2010 09:24:45 PM
1276 Views
Touchy point, heh?
- 15/06/2010 09:28:47 PM
1211 Views
- 15/06/2010 09:28:47 PM
1211 Views
Then how come Lanfear never died? We know she made attempts to capture him.
- 15/06/2010 09:31:20 PM
1271 Views
Whom? LTT? Can you elaborate?
- 15/06/2010 09:33:25 PM
1216 Views
If you wish...
- 15/06/2010 09:34:38 PM
984 Views
Re: If you wish...
- 15/06/2010 09:36:30 PM
994 Views
Whyever not?
- 15/06/2010 09:39:22 PM
1078 Views
Re: Whyever not?
- 15/06/2010 09:41:22 PM
960 Views
Even in that situation
- 15/06/2010 09:43:04 PM
1254 Views
Re: Even in that situation
- 15/06/2010 09:47:36 PM
1237 Views
Okay...
- 15/06/2010 09:59:36 PM
1177 Views
Re: Okay...
- 15/06/2010 10:39:01 PM
1147 Views
So, if it doesn't agree with your view, its fuzzy, even when that is what the books say?
*NM*
- 15/06/2010 10:42:48 PM
652 Views
*NM*
- 15/06/2010 10:42:48 PM
652 Views
What?
- 15/06/2010 10:45:16 PM
1109 Views
If we use your interpretation of the statements. *NM*
- 15/06/2010 10:49:21 PM
559 Views
Re: If we use your interpretation of the statements.
- 15/06/2010 10:54:48 PM
1031 Views
Okay, here's what I think you're saying...
- 15/06/2010 11:00:19 PM
1202 Views
Hehehe! Classic. Maybe his hands were full of her...err..Globes of Fire...
- 15/06/2010 09:47:35 PM
1111 Views
It's like women's tennis. Put the best up against a middling men's tennis player and they lose. *NM*
- 16/06/2010 12:18:06 AM
487 Views
Re: No three women could block him from the Source...
- 16/06/2010 04:00:00 PM
1084 Views
I disagree.
- 16/06/2010 04:03:52 PM
1249 Views
I'd like to think Egwene, Elayne and Aviendha could
- 17/06/2010 04:19:22 PM
1049 Views
Agreed
- 17/06/2010 05:59:39 PM
953 Views
They might be able to, but then they are not 3 women of <b>average AS</b> strength
- 17/06/2010 07:10:14 PM
1127 Views
They would be far more than 3 average AS
- 17/06/2010 08:07:30 PM
1139 Views
Another related quote
- 18/06/2010 07:49:33 PM
1104 Views
well, in the same book about 5 minutes after Lanfear almost kicks Rands ass
- 18/06/2010 08:11:49 PM
1185 Views
