Active Users:456 Time:02/06/2026 10:31:54 PM
Because... Etzel Send a noteboard - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM
Such a scene would precisely be a flashback in Rand's plot-/ timeline, especially if we would get the PoV from Graendal just before Rand's balefire hit her palace. It's clear from his answers, that BS won't jump back in Rand's plotline.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2230 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1356 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1193 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1134 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1177 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 1121 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 1032 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1133 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 1105 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 1017 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 976 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 940 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1161 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 902 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 1060 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 1011 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 1062 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 971 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 971 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 1051 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1176 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 939 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 1038 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1237 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 950 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1150 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 1077 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1147 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 1029 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1131 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 967 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1166 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 1045 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 1025 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 1129 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 1033 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 1112 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 464 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 855 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 997 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 1012 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 969 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 943 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 1054 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 1087 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 1113 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1192 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1182 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 1021 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 1073 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 937 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 1012 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 918 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 973 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 1027 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 985 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 1076 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 1074 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1149 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 900 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 925 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 1050 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 1005 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1207 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 979 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 488 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 1091 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 958 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 981 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 1102 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 905 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 974 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1205 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 930 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 1055 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 1060 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 985 Views

Reply to Message