Active Users:172 Time:17/05/2024 02:56:10 AM
Because... Etzel Send a noteboard - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM
Such a scene would precisely be a flashback in Rand's plot-/ timeline, especially if we would get the PoV from Graendal just before Rand's balefire hit her palace. It's clear from his answers, that BS won't jump back in Rand's plotline.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 1906 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1037 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 913 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 843 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 858 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 794 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 717 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 823 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 804 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 711 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 679 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 649 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 857 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 620 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 779 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 699 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 716 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 652 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 629 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 677 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 845 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 608 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 744 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 937 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 638 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 859 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 775 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 847 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 734 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 829 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 656 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 870 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 729 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 675 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 814 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 742 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 815 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 327 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 544 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 660 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 714 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 672 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 604 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 734 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 751 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 800 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 881 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 857 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 740 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 738 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 649 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 734 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 627 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 663 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 731 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 688 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 784 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 788 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 781 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 611 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 633 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 775 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 726 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 873 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 678 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 357 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 809 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 676 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 719 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 811 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 602 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 681 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 912 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 622 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 736 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 776 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 691 Views

Reply to Message