Active Users:1206 Time:18/04/2026 03:32:05 PM
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong dacole Send a noteboard - 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM
And how this proves it can't be Grendel but you will not convince them. We both know lanfear did it but we will just have to wait for the book to be published for the rest of us to get to figure it out.


In fact, BS's answer that there are flashbacks makes is highly likely that we will get a Graendal PoV.


For example, Perrin, but also Lan or Loial.

It's complete nonsense to bring back a character that died in Rand's timeline - which is up to date - with a scene before the death; something like this also never happened before in the series. One could also argue in a similarly absurd way then that we will "likely" get another Semirhage or Elza PoV from before their deaths, just because it would be cool.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2197 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1324 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1168 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1101 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1146 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 1080 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 999 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1100 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 1071 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 983 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 941 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 910 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1114 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 869 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 1025 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 979 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 1027 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 941 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 937 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 1019 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1146 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 893 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 1003 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1207 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 916 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1117 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong - 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM 1004 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 1050 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1116 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 996 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1101 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 937 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1134 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 1010 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 990 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 1095 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 998 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 1082 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 449 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 825 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 956 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 981 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 939 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 908 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 1019 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 1024 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 1078 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1161 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1148 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 991 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 1027 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 906 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 979 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 880 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 939 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 1002 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 948 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 1048 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 1045 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1125 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 870 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 893 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 1021 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 983 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1180 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 946 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 476 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 1063 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 926 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 949 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 1074 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 868 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 941 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1177 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 902 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 1021 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 1028 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 955 Views

Reply to Message