Active Users:1317 Time:22/07/2026 01:37:25 AM
No... Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM
I argue that this Graendal flashback theory is ridiculous if she died in TGS, because something like this never happened in the series (namely that a dead character got a flashback in the next book; other characters just think about the dead character). No one argued this after Sammael's or Osan'gar's death, because it's obviously absurd. Graendal would have gotten another PoV in TGS if it were needed. Apparently a few people just think it will be differently in Graendal's case, because RJ said that Asmo's killer will most likely reveal it in his or her PoV.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2264 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1379 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1224 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1158 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1201 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 1145 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 1054 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1163 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 1124 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 1039 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 996 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 970 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1187 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 928 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 1085 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 1038 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 1094 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 994 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 999 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 1079 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1196 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 963 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 1060 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1264 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 976 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1188 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 1099 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1165 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 1052 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1153 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 991 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1195 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 1066 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 1050 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 1153 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 1054 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 1136 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 475 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 874 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 1023 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 1038 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 994 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 971 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 1078 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 1143 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 1136 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1215 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1208 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 1043 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 1105 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 967 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 1037 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 942 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 997 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 1051 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 1009 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 1099 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 1102 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1169 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 926 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 952 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 1081 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 1036 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1234 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 1012 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 500 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 1113 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 986 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 1004 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 1129 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 956 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 996 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1233 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 953 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 1083 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 1087 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 1008 Views

Reply to Message