Active Users:1306 Time:22/07/2026 01:41:09 AM
But we never... Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM
Such a flashback device with a dead character never happened in the books before. It's the same as stating that it is likely that Semirhage, Elza, the BA in Caemlyn or any other dead characters will yet get a revealing scene in ToM where they chat about something. Completely absurd and also contrary to what BS said on this topic.

If there will be more info about Graendal it will come in the PoV from other characters, like fellow Forsaken or SH (or BS will reveal in in a Q&A). That is the way it is always done in the series, if a character died, and just makes the most sense.


Not with a dead character perhaps, but we did see a flashback of the battle at Dumai's wells from the POV of the Shaido, as they flee the attack of the Asha'man. We also have views of the Cleansing from the view of others as they sense the beacon of OP. It is not beyond reason that we might have a similar scene from Graendals POV.

This is especially true if Graendal turns up to have something to do with Perrins plotline (such as manipulating Masema via compulsion or something)


Have such a PoV from a character, who died in the previous book. Therefore it's highly unlikely that BS would suddenly do something like this.

One can't really understand why some people firmly believe that we will probably get such a scene from Graendal's PoV. It's like stating that we will likely get a Elza PoV in ToM, where she has a chat with her Warder before her death to give as important informations. If infos about Elza would be such important and couldn't be included in TGS for some reason, we would rather get a PoV of her Warder in ToM, where he thinks about Elza and their past talk. This is less confusing than bringing a dead character back and could actually advance the plot without jumping back in the timeline. The other way is unnecessarily more complicated.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2265 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1379 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1225 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1159 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1202 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 1145 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 1055 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1164 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 1125 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 1039 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 996 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 971 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1188 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 929 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 1086 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 1039 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 1095 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 995 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 1000 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 1079 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1196 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 963 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 1061 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1265 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 977 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1189 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 1100 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1166 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 1052 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1154 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 992 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1196 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 1067 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 1051 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 1154 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 1055 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 1137 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 476 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 875 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 1024 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 1039 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 995 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 972 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 1078 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 1143 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 1136 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1215 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1208 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 1044 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 1106 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 968 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 1038 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 942 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 997 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 1052 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 1009 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 1100 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 1103 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1169 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 927 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 953 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 1082 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 1037 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1235 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 1013 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 501 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 1114 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 986 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 1005 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 1130 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 957 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 997 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1234 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 954 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 1084 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 1087 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 1008 Views

Reply to Message