Active Users:222 Time:17/05/2024 02:28:56 AM
Ok... Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM
We make a bet: I say we will get an Aran'gar PoV in ToM, where she muses about Graendal's death, etc., while you say that we will get a Graendal PoV in ToM from before her death, where she tells that she killed Asmo, etc. . The winner gets a cookie!
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 1906 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1037 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 913 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 843 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 857 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 794 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 717 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 823 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 804 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 711 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 679 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 649 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 857 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 620 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 779 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 699 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 716 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 652 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 629 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 677 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 845 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 608 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 744 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 937 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 637 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 859 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 775 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 847 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 734 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 829 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 656 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 870 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 729 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 674 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 814 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 742 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 814 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 327 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 544 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 659 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 714 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 671 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 604 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 734 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 751 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 800 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 880 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 857 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 740 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 738 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 649 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 734 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 627 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 663 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 731 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 688 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 784 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 788 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 780 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 611 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 633 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 775 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 726 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 873 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 678 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 357 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 809 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 676 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 718 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 811 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 602 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 681 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 912 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 622 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 736 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 776 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 691 Views

Reply to Message