Active Users:390 Time:17/06/2025 12:26:03 AM
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM
I disagree since she was killed by rand she is directly part of his plotline. Now how exactly can we have a revel of her as the killer when it HAS BEEN SAID that the KILLER will be revealing it themself. When she is dead and we know she won't be getting a flashback. Moraine killed him (slayer is ridiculous sorry eztal).

I would love for you to give more detail on how the scenes you imagine would play out.


Such a scene would precisely be a flashback in Rand's plot-/ timeline, especially if we would get the PoV from Graendal just before Rand's balefire hit her palace. It's clear from his answers, that BS won't jump back in Rand's plotline.


a better candidate as Asmodean's killer. Which it does not. There are plenty of ways to reveal Graendal as the culprit even if she is dead AND there are NO flashbacks.

There are dozens of ways to incorporate a Graendal scene from another POV that is NOT in Rand's plot line. Aran'gar could be near Elayne, Mat or Perrin and have such a flashback. Mesaana could have a chat with Demandred. Moridin could inform Cyndane and/or Moghedien of Graendal's death (or escape if that's how it plays out), there could even be another Social prior to Rand Balefiring NB.

Just because BSand said there won't be as much flashback as book 10 doesn't mean Graendal won't appear, you can't even claim she's even part of Rand's plot line! For most of the series she's not been involved directly in any of the main cast's plot lines.

He's been vague on her death since the beginning and has even alluded to her possibly being alive, which could mean she has a live appearance after the events at NB.


with her. There is nothing to indicate that she won't have a scene involving Graendal in the next book.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2050 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1195 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1046 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 979 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1002 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 949 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 854 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 974 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 958 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM 916 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved - 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM 925 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 849 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 820 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 788 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 991 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 748 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 914 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 841 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 871 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 778 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 778 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 831 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 989 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 756 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 885 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1078 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 805 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 990 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 920 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 985 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 871 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 974 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 799 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1010 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 866 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 831 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 953 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 885 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 951 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 385 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 687 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 810 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 855 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 812 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 769 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 878 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 902 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 946 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1023 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 996 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 873 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 883 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 794 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 867 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 762 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 813 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 865 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 830 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 933 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 927 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 958 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 749 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 760 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 902 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 870 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1023 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 819 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 421 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 941 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 809 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 829 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 944 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 737 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 824 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1054 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 763 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 880 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 910 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 828 Views

Reply to Message