Active Users:351 Time:02/05/2025 08:51:34 AM
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
I agree that it is from the age of legends because Rand reflects on it's age, and no sword with cloth wrappings on the hilt could survive that long unless it was created with the power.

He ?ngered the cloth-tied hilt

It looked as if it had been designed speci?cally for Rand—and yet it was centuries old, unearthed only recently. 


If it is not Justice than it is at least a ter/an/sa'angreal of some sort. Other wise Rand wouldn't think:

How odd, that they should ?nd this now, he thought, and make a gift of it to me, completely unaware of what they were holding. . . .


Of course, no real sword that wasn't fored by the power or very carefuly maintained and stored could survive a thousand years, on the other hand, it's a fictional sword in a book and even the ebst author tends to overlooks the occassional detail, so I suppose we shouldn't take it for granted that if it is Justice it is also an OP-forged weapon, but odds are it is Justice and it is OP-forged. They probably tell us in the prologue, so w emay all be laughing at our wild-arse theories in a few days here :D
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1266 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 743 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 779 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 690 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 687 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 748 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 731 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 692 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 663 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 721 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 825 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 696 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 666 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 626 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 703 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 627 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 593 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 679 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 817 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 752 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 679 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 674 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 690 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 639 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 622 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 643 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1132 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 709 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 660 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 612 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 660 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 623 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 727 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 698 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 668 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 642 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 650 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 612 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 690 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 740 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 727 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 657 Views

Reply to Message