Active Users:2504 Time:08/05/2026 04:45:01 AM
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
I agree that it is from the age of legends because Rand reflects on it's age, and no sword with cloth wrappings on the hilt could survive that long unless it was created with the power.

He ?ngered the cloth-tied hilt

It looked as if it had been designed speci?cally for Rand—and yet it was centuries old, unearthed only recently. 


If it is not Justice than it is at least a ter/an/sa'angreal of some sort. Other wise Rand wouldn't think:

How odd, that they should ?nd this now, he thought, and make a gift of it to me, completely unaware of what they were holding. . . .


Of course, no real sword that wasn't fored by the power or very carefuly maintained and stored could survive a thousand years, on the other hand, it's a fictional sword in a book and even the ebst author tends to overlooks the occassional detail, so I suppose we shouldn't take it for granted that if it is Justice it is also an OP-forged weapon, but odds are it is Justice and it is OP-forged. They probably tell us in the prologue, so w emay all be laughing at our wild-arse theories in a few days here :D
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1517 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 979 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1004 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 915 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 936 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 995 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 956 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 908 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 875 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 973 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1129 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 919 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 928 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 848 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 930 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 859 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 830 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 903 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1074 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 975 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 921 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 904 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 921 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 901 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 875 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 892 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1417 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 951 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 910 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 883 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 895 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 835 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 943 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 964 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 902 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 855 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 847 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 827 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 936 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 986 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 948 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 879 Views

Reply to Message