Active Users:857 Time:05/02/2026 12:42:56 AM
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
I agree that it is from the age of legends because Rand reflects on it's age, and no sword with cloth wrappings on the hilt could survive that long unless it was created with the power.

He ?ngered the cloth-tied hilt

It looked as if it had been designed speci?cally for Rand—and yet it was centuries old, unearthed only recently. 


If it is not Justice than it is at least a ter/an/sa'angreal of some sort. Other wise Rand wouldn't think:

How odd, that they should ?nd this now, he thought, and make a gift of it to me, completely unaware of what they were holding. . . .


Of course, no real sword that wasn't fored by the power or very carefuly maintained and stored could survive a thousand years, on the other hand, it's a fictional sword in a book and even the ebst author tends to overlooks the occassional detail, so I suppose we shouldn't take it for granted that if it is Justice it is also an OP-forged weapon, but odds are it is Justice and it is OP-forged. They probably tell us in the prologue, so w emay all be laughing at our wild-arse theories in a few days here :D
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1448 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 921 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 945 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 854 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 869 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 934 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 890 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 843 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 816 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 910 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1066 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 859 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 863 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 788 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 870 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 797 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 768 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 841 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1009 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 908 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 861 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 839 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 863 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 833 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 811 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 823 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1345 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 885 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 835 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 815 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 839 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 775 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 884 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 896 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 846 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 786 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 781 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 769 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 864 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 925 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 889 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message