Active Users:652 Time:24/06/2026 09:06:10 PM
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
I agree that it is from the age of legends because Rand reflects on it's age, and no sword with cloth wrappings on the hilt could survive that long unless it was created with the power.

He ?ngered the cloth-tied hilt

It looked as if it had been designed speci?cally for Rand—and yet it was centuries old, unearthed only recently. 


If it is not Justice than it is at least a ter/an/sa'angreal of some sort. Other wise Rand wouldn't think:

How odd, that they should ?nd this now, he thought, and make a gift of it to me, completely unaware of what they were holding. . . .


Of course, no real sword that wasn't fored by the power or very carefuly maintained and stored could survive a thousand years, on the other hand, it's a fictional sword in a book and even the ebst author tends to overlooks the occassional detail, so I suppose we shouldn't take it for granted that if it is Justice it is also an OP-forged weapon, but odds are it is Justice and it is OP-forged. They probably tell us in the prologue, so w emay all be laughing at our wild-arse theories in a few days here :D
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1545 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1007 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1034 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 948 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 971 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1023 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 989 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 935 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 907 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1008 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1156 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 958 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 965 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 878 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 950 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 887 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 856 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 934 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1104 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1010 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 951 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 932 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 954 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 935 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 914 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 926 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1451 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 975 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 942 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 913 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 927 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 857 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 973 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 998 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 941 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 892 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 881 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 860 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 962 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1020 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 970 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 910 Views

Reply to Message