Active Users:895 Time:06/08/2025 03:02:48 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 13/09/2009 03:16:13 PM
Aginor is not on RJ's list of the top Forsaken. He may have been one of the strongest, but his skills were less than impressive. It's the global picture that makes the difference, not the person's raw strength. Alivia may be the strongest woman in the Light but Cyndane used skill alone to balance the strength difference, and made it an even match.

Not quite even as Aliva "won" or at least she prevented Cyndane from reaching her objective. Even tho Cyndane severly broke her arm, it was Aliva who held the field.

NaCl( 'almost even' at best)H2O
Reply to message
The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Sidious - 12/09/2009 09:27:20 PM 1781 Views
Some thoughts about Semmy Lordling - 12/09/2009 09:59:50 PM 971 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Semmy Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:33:28 AM 1020 Views
Of course... Digital_Eon - 13/09/2009 08:36:39 AM 826 Views
I've been thinking the same for years Dragonsworn - 12/09/2009 11:25:02 PM 931 Views
The Big White Book says... Yvves - 12/09/2009 11:46:43 PM 999 Views
Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:36:37 AM 1010 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:16:13 PM 898 Views
Re: Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 05:47:14 PM 949 Views
Fact is, the bwb is untrustworthy Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:54:28 PM 867 Views
We must either use all the quotes from the BWB or none of them Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:07:46 PM 910 Views
Or... Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:41:23 PM 855 Views
Re: Or... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:46:52 AM 814 Views
But, RJ himself said that the BWB was written from the standpoint of a scholar RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:42:59 PM 844 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 08:17:28 PM 815 Views
It all depends on how you define "powerful" Lanfear - 14/09/2009 02:30:31 AM 934 Views
I agree 101%. *NM* Yvves - 14/09/2009 03:49:51 AM 472 Views
I think power is much more than raw strength Sidious - 14/09/2009 05:00:10 AM 819 Views
I agree for the most part, but disagree on one thing. Lanfear - 14/09/2009 07:52:10 PM 946 Views
Re: The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Bulgakov - 12/09/2009 11:48:03 PM 869 Views
the other reason NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM 796 Views
So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:41:42 PM 799 Views
Graendal could fight Lanfear and win Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:01:57 PM 1341 Views
Graendal herself says... Shannow - 13/09/2009 09:08:46 PM 824 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:48:37 AM 860 Views
Doesn't Graendal have an Angreal now? Rurouni_Kenshin - 17/09/2009 03:29:10 AM 888 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:36:53 PM 734 Views
Lanfear was more powerful than Graendal, but Cyndane has less power beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:19:35 PM 834 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Watcher - 13/09/2009 06:05:11 PM 957 Views
I agree with this Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:15:24 PM 964 Views
Compulsion=any other deadly weave. Doesn't really change matters beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:23:40 PM 831 Views
Excellent point *NM* Shannow - 13/09/2009 10:35:08 PM 480 Views
But it did give her an edge, and against two forsaken. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:12:09 PM 453 Views
Hm? When? *NM* beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:04:10 PM 380 Views
tPoD, when she compelled Cyndane and Moghedien. *NM* fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:19:23 PM 430 Views
Not at all Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:51:48 AM 884 Views
Using Compulsion on someone doesn't seem mechanically different beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:03:41 PM 731 Views
I'm not so sure about that Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:36:45 PM 834 Views
Totally agree Shannow - 14/09/2009 10:26:07 PM 643 Views
I don't agree. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:33:04 PM 947 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:34:24 PM 784 Views
But Graendal confronted her... twice! *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 07:48:29 PM 404 Views
Apparently only the third time counts *NM* Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:00:37 PM 445 Views
But the third time's supposed to be lucky. So that won't count either. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:26:18 PM 465 Views
Really? Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:36:33 PM 797 Views
No falsely... fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:25:40 PM 1014 Views
That's pretty much my opinion in a nutshell Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:56:15 AM 959 Views
And, of course, the male and female OP strength ranks might not even correlate that much RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:41:58 PM 762 Views
They correlate on some critical points Sidious - 14/09/2009 06:57:43 PM 915 Views
That's not exactly what I'm referring to. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:36:29 PM 711 Views
But then we are discussing the same thing Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:59:04 PM 857 Views
I think, outside of semantics, our main disagreement doesn't lie amid the higher tiers RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 03:53:09 PM 727 Views
Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 06:31:27 PM 871 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 07:19:03 PM 841 Views
Re: Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 08:59:31 PM 789 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 18/09/2009 07:03:09 PM 1125 Views
Ahh the old debate... fionwe1987 - 17/09/2009 12:42:36 AM 809 Views
Re: Ahh the old debate... Sidious - 17/09/2009 05:26:52 AM 768 Views
I only disagree on one point, I think they are all rather equal in potential, incl. Ishamael RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:28:12 PM 815 Views
I do think Ishamel is special Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:03 PM 907 Views
He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 11:36:42 PM 858 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 08:36:20 AM 829 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 03:48:34 PM 826 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM 814 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:53:00 PM 804 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:47:45 PM 767 Views
The more interesting question is... AgentOrange - 14/09/2009 06:34:11 PM 761 Views
Hmmm Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:34 PM 789 Views
I think we'll see Graendal vs. Aran'gar. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:31:16 PM 860 Views
Ah yes, that makes sense, and would be great! *NM* Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:40:29 PM 670 Views
Yeah. Though I think its no competition. Graendal has got to be better than a walking tree! fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:50:09 PM 753 Views
They do imply that Graendal is a lot more dangerous than she looks beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:08:43 PM 781 Views
I've never underestimated Graendal Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:42:49 PM 833 Views
Yeah... her frivolity was always a red flag for me too. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:18:40 PM 843 Views
To me, she is the most lethal. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 05:18:10 PM 633 Views
Yup... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:39:20 PM 682 Views
I still like Lanfear more Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:51:03 PM 781 Views
Bah! She's an idiot! fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:06:06 PM 777 Views
only in love *NM* Sidious - 15/09/2009 07:23:29 PM 742 Views
Graendal did not beat me and Moghedien Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:59:39 PM 857 Views
Agreed Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:36:48 PM 754 Views
Ummm... how do we know? fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:40:57 PM 879 Views
Re: Ummm... how do we know? Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:56:21 PM 800 Views
Hmmm... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:07:45 PM 970 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes