Active Users:417 Time:18/06/2025 07:13:27 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
the other reason NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM
Agree. Part of the reason ishy is naeblis.

Is that Ishy is Shaitan's "fancy pants boy". After all Ishy failed badly on two separate instances. One he failed to prevent (or even try to prevent) the use of the Bowl of Winds. That was a Major setback for the Dark. The other failure is of course the Cleansing. We always hear (and in some instances see) that the Shadow is very intolerant of failure. Yet Ishy has gotten off scot free on these two massive blunders.

NaCl(the only conclusion is that Ishy is "teachers pet" )H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Sidious - 12/09/2009 09:27:20 PM 1762 Views
Some thoughts about Semmy Lordling - 12/09/2009 09:59:50 PM 952 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Semmy Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:33:28 AM 1002 Views
Of course... Digital_Eon - 13/09/2009 08:36:39 AM 809 Views
I've been thinking the same for years Dragonsworn - 12/09/2009 11:25:02 PM 916 Views
The Big White Book says... Yvves - 12/09/2009 11:46:43 PM 981 Views
Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:36:37 AM 990 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:16:13 PM 881 Views
Re: Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 05:47:14 PM 923 Views
Fact is, the bwb is untrustworthy Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:54:28 PM 838 Views
We must either use all the quotes from the BWB or none of them Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:07:46 PM 892 Views
Or... Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:41:23 PM 836 Views
Re: Or... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:46:52 AM 795 Views
But, RJ himself said that the BWB was written from the standpoint of a scholar RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:42:59 PM 824 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 08:17:28 PM 797 Views
It all depends on how you define "powerful" Lanfear - 14/09/2009 02:30:31 AM 915 Views
I agree 101%. *NM* Yvves - 14/09/2009 03:49:51 AM 463 Views
I think power is much more than raw strength Sidious - 14/09/2009 05:00:10 AM 798 Views
I agree for the most part, but disagree on one thing. Lanfear - 14/09/2009 07:52:10 PM 927 Views
Re: The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Bulgakov - 12/09/2009 11:48:03 PM 847 Views
the other reason NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM 780 Views
So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:41:42 PM 784 Views
Graendal could fight Lanfear and win Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:01:57 PM 1324 Views
Graendal herself says... Shannow - 13/09/2009 09:08:46 PM 805 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:48:37 AM 828 Views
Doesn't Graendal have an Angreal now? Rurouni_Kenshin - 17/09/2009 03:29:10 AM 859 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:36:53 PM 719 Views
Lanfear was more powerful than Graendal, but Cyndane has less power beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:19:35 PM 812 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Watcher - 13/09/2009 06:05:11 PM 924 Views
I agree with this Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:15:24 PM 946 Views
Compulsion=any other deadly weave. Doesn't really change matters beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:23:40 PM 802 Views
Excellent point *NM* Shannow - 13/09/2009 10:35:08 PM 470 Views
But it did give her an edge, and against two forsaken. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:12:09 PM 445 Views
Hm? When? *NM* beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:04:10 PM 372 Views
tPoD, when she compelled Cyndane and Moghedien. *NM* fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:19:23 PM 423 Views
Not at all Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:51:48 AM 864 Views
Using Compulsion on someone doesn't seem mechanically different beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:03:41 PM 711 Views
I'm not so sure about that Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:36:45 PM 817 Views
Totally agree Shannow - 14/09/2009 10:26:07 PM 623 Views
I don't agree. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:33:04 PM 929 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:34:24 PM 765 Views
But Graendal confronted her... twice! *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 07:48:29 PM 398 Views
Apparently only the third time counts *NM* Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:00:37 PM 432 Views
But the third time's supposed to be lucky. So that won't count either. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:26:18 PM 458 Views
Really? Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:36:33 PM 780 Views
No falsely... fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:25:40 PM 997 Views
That's pretty much my opinion in a nutshell Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:56:15 AM 927 Views
And, of course, the male and female OP strength ranks might not even correlate that much RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:41:58 PM 743 Views
They correlate on some critical points Sidious - 14/09/2009 06:57:43 PM 875 Views
That's not exactly what I'm referring to. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:36:29 PM 693 Views
But then we are discussing the same thing Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:59:04 PM 837 Views
I think, outside of semantics, our main disagreement doesn't lie amid the higher tiers RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 03:53:09 PM 711 Views
Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 06:31:27 PM 853 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 07:19:03 PM 821 Views
Re: Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 08:59:31 PM 771 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 18/09/2009 07:03:09 PM 1107 Views
Ahh the old debate... fionwe1987 - 17/09/2009 12:42:36 AM 790 Views
Re: Ahh the old debate... Sidious - 17/09/2009 05:26:52 AM 743 Views
I only disagree on one point, I think they are all rather equal in potential, incl. Ishamael RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:28:12 PM 797 Views
I do think Ishamel is special Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:03 PM 885 Views
He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 11:36:42 PM 838 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 08:36:20 AM 810 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 03:48:34 PM 799 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM 797 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:53:00 PM 789 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:47:45 PM 750 Views
The more interesting question is... AgentOrange - 14/09/2009 06:34:11 PM 742 Views
Hmmm Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:34 PM 770 Views
I think we'll see Graendal vs. Aran'gar. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:31:16 PM 840 Views
Ah yes, that makes sense, and would be great! *NM* Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:40:29 PM 640 Views
Yeah. Though I think its no competition. Graendal has got to be better than a walking tree! fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:50:09 PM 734 Views
They do imply that Graendal is a lot more dangerous than she looks beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:08:43 PM 763 Views
I've never underestimated Graendal Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:42:49 PM 816 Views
Yeah... her frivolity was always a red flag for me too. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:18:40 PM 798 Views
To me, she is the most lethal. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 05:18:10 PM 616 Views
Yup... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:39:20 PM 665 Views
I still like Lanfear more Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:51:03 PM 761 Views
Bah! She's an idiot! fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:06:06 PM 760 Views
only in love *NM* Sidious - 15/09/2009 07:23:29 PM 725 Views
Graendal did not beat me and Moghedien Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:59:39 PM 840 Views
Agreed Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:36:48 PM 736 Views
Ummm... how do we know? fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:40:57 PM 859 Views
Re: Ummm... how do we know? Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:56:21 PM 782 Views
Hmmm... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:07:45 PM 941 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes