Active Users:1716 Time:02/05/2026 08:04:53 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 13/09/2009 08:17:28 PM
Besides, my point was merely that skill can compensate for a strength difference, and that strength can mean less if the channeler is unskilled or unknowledgable.

Oh I agree with this 100% For instance Rand was stronger than Rahvin but was losing until Nyn and Moggy "distracted" Rahvin.

NaCl(it's the same even in sports, an older "weaker/slower" player can frequently beat a younger "stronger/faster" one)H2O
Reply to message
The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Sidious - 12/09/2009 09:27:20 PM 1913 Views
Some thoughts about Semmy Lordling - 12/09/2009 09:59:50 PM 1085 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Semmy Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:33:28 AM 1160 Views
Of course... Digital_Eon - 13/09/2009 08:36:39 AM 954 Views
I've been thinking the same for years Dragonsworn - 12/09/2009 11:25:02 PM 1067 Views
The Big White Book says... Yvves - 12/09/2009 11:46:43 PM 1140 Views
Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:36:37 AM 1139 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:16:13 PM 1047 Views
Re: Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 05:47:14 PM 1092 Views
Fact is, the bwb is untrustworthy Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:54:28 PM 1005 Views
We must either use all the quotes from the BWB or none of them Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:07:46 PM 1041 Views
Or... Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:41:23 PM 983 Views
Re: Or... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:46:52 AM 951 Views
But, RJ himself said that the BWB was written from the standpoint of a scholar RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:42:59 PM 1031 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 08:17:28 PM 954 Views
It all depends on how you define "powerful" Lanfear - 14/09/2009 02:30:31 AM 1062 Views
I agree 101%. *NM* Yvves - 14/09/2009 03:49:51 AM 530 Views
I think power is much more than raw strength Sidious - 14/09/2009 05:00:10 AM 969 Views
I agree for the most part, but disagree on one thing. Lanfear - 14/09/2009 07:52:10 PM 1135 Views
Re: The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Bulgakov - 12/09/2009 11:48:03 PM 996 Views
the other reason NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM 917 Views
So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:41:42 PM 926 Views
Graendal could fight Lanfear and win Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:01:57 PM 1502 Views
Graendal herself says... Shannow - 13/09/2009 09:08:46 PM 955 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:48:37 AM 1010 Views
Doesn't Graendal have an Angreal now? Rurouni_Kenshin - 17/09/2009 03:29:10 AM 1026 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:36:53 PM 884 Views
Lanfear was more powerful than Graendal, but Cyndane has less power beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:19:35 PM 945 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Watcher - 13/09/2009 06:05:11 PM 1109 Views
I agree with this Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:15:24 PM 1101 Views
Compulsion=any other deadly weave. Doesn't really change matters beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:23:40 PM 983 Views
Excellent point *NM* Shannow - 13/09/2009 10:35:08 PM 542 Views
But it did give her an edge, and against two forsaken. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:12:09 PM 507 Views
Hm? When? *NM* beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:04:10 PM 448 Views
tPoD, when she compelled Cyndane and Moghedien. *NM* fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:19:23 PM 486 Views
Not at all Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:51:48 AM 1028 Views
Using Compulsion on someone doesn't seem mechanically different beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:03:41 PM 878 Views
I'm not so sure about that Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:36:45 PM 957 Views
Totally agree Shannow - 14/09/2009 10:26:07 PM 815 Views
I don't agree. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:33:04 PM 1091 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:34:24 PM 912 Views
But Graendal confronted her... twice! *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 07:48:29 PM 458 Views
Apparently only the third time counts *NM* Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:00:37 PM 504 Views
But the third time's supposed to be lucky. So that won't count either. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:26:18 PM 521 Views
Really? Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:36:33 PM 954 Views
No falsely... fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:25:40 PM 1167 Views
That's pretty much my opinion in a nutshell Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:56:15 AM 1131 Views
And, of course, the male and female OP strength ranks might not even correlate that much RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:41:58 PM 888 Views
They correlate on some critical points Sidious - 14/09/2009 06:57:43 PM 1092 Views
That's not exactly what I'm referring to. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:36:29 PM 839 Views
But then we are discussing the same thing Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:59:04 PM 985 Views
I think, outside of semantics, our main disagreement doesn't lie amid the higher tiers RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 03:53:09 PM 850 Views
Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 06:31:27 PM 997 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 07:19:03 PM 966 Views
Re: Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 08:59:31 PM 955 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 18/09/2009 07:03:09 PM 1290 Views
Ahh the old debate... fionwe1987 - 17/09/2009 12:42:36 AM 928 Views
Re: Ahh the old debate... Sidious - 17/09/2009 05:26:52 AM 897 Views
I only disagree on one point, I think they are all rather equal in potential, incl. Ishamael RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:28:12 PM 991 Views
I do think Ishamel is special Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:03 PM 1060 Views
He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 11:36:42 PM 1017 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 08:36:20 AM 979 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 03:48:34 PM 965 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM 949 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:53:00 PM 953 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:47:45 PM 989 Views
The more interesting question is... AgentOrange - 14/09/2009 06:34:11 PM 880 Views
Hmmm Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:34 PM 972 Views
I think we'll see Graendal vs. Aran'gar. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:31:16 PM 1007 Views
Ah yes, that makes sense, and would be great! *NM* Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:40:29 PM 820 Views
Yeah. Though I think its no competition. Graendal has got to be better than a walking tree! fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:50:09 PM 880 Views
They do imply that Graendal is a lot more dangerous than she looks beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:08:43 PM 905 Views
I've never underestimated Graendal Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:42:49 PM 959 Views
Yeah... her frivolity was always a red flag for me too. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:18:40 PM 1002 Views
To me, she is the most lethal. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 05:18:10 PM 747 Views
Yup... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:39:20 PM 801 Views
I still like Lanfear more Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:51:03 PM 887 Views
Bah! She's an idiot! fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:06:06 PM 896 Views
only in love *NM* Sidious - 15/09/2009 07:23:29 PM 852 Views
Graendal did not beat me and Moghedien Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:59:39 PM 992 Views
Agreed Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:36:48 PM 878 Views
Ummm... how do we know? fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:40:57 PM 1017 Views
Re: Ummm... how do we know? Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:56:21 PM 924 Views
Hmmm... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:07:45 PM 1120 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes