Active Users:616 Time:15/10/2025 03:34:40 AM
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM
I tend to think Lews Therin was made the First because of his leadership abilities - he seems to have had some rare Talents, but none of which were as impressive as the skills possessed by the Forsaken and some of Rand's Third Age companions. Perhaps he was a consensus builder, and a capable leader (ie: somewhat like a Blue Ajah Amyrlin - one of their greatest Sisters was considered to be Eadyth who was said to be "one of the most capable Blues in the last one hundred years"...as an Ajah, they seem to prize versatility). Because choosing your leader on the basis of One Power strength doesn't seem to gel with their society, in which strength wasn't as important due to the uniquitousness of Circles. If people referred to leadership qualities, I'd not raise any objections, but the reasons people trot out for Lews to be awarded "Best Man Ever!" always have to do with Talents, OP strength and t'a'veren status - none of which have anything to do with his personality or skills.


I agree and disagree. I also think that LTT was chosen as the First among Servants because of his leadership skills - he was akin to a world leader anyway. There is another dimension, though, and that is the One Power. I think that the Aes Sedai in the Age of Legends paid quite a lot of attention to ability with their gifts. For instance, the only reason that Balthamel wasn't fired from his job was because of his strength in the Power. This means that they placed influence on the person's ability, which isn't very utopian at all. It's also convenient that Lews Therin is the strongest possible channeler in the Power, which means it's difficult to say that his ability in saidin wasn't relevant. Furthermore, I find it difficult to believe he wasn't a very skilled man too. Even you say that the Forsaken were very skilled and Talented, and yet none of them ever managed to overcome him, and still consider him to be their toughest physical opponent.

That said, Ishamael still lurks somewhere in the evil supervillain category. Basically, he sucks. And I haven't seen anything to prove otherwise. His whole backstory revolves around being defeated again and again - we don't even have any stories of his successes during the War of Power, unlike the other Forsaken. The only "success" he had was turning Hawkwing against Aes Sedai and the formation of the Black Ajah - both of which are rather lackluster in comparison to Lews Therin, Latra Posae or a Rashima Kerenmosa. So his only claim to villainy is being a philosopher who is somewhat of a nihilist (?).


Well it's obvious why Ishamael is like that - his victory would mean the end of the Light, and no story for us to read. If he defeated Lews Therin at the duel, or Rand at any stage, that would kind of be the end of everything. He may be unable to defeat Lews Therin but that doesn't mean he's a total loser - he might just be 2nd to Lews Therin. There's a fictional component to this villainy.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power - 12/09/2009 09:27:20 PM 1815 Views
Some thoughts about Semmy - 12/09/2009 09:59:50 PM 1001 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Semmy - 13/09/2009 08:33:28 AM 1057 Views
Of course... - 13/09/2009 08:36:39 AM 857 Views
I've been thinking the same for years - 12/09/2009 11:25:02 PM 969 Views
The Big White Book says... - 12/09/2009 11:46:43 PM 1033 Views
Not Aginor - 13/09/2009 08:36:37 AM 1036 Views
Re: Not Aginor - 13/09/2009 03:16:13 PM 935 Views
Re: Not Aginor - 13/09/2009 05:47:14 PM 989 Views
Fact is, the bwb is untrustworthy - 13/09/2009 05:54:28 PM 912 Views
We must either use all the quotes from the BWB or none of them - 13/09/2009 06:07:46 PM 946 Views
Or... - 13/09/2009 08:41:23 PM 881 Views
Re: Or... - 14/09/2009 04:46:52 AM 858 Views
But, RJ himself said that the BWB was written from the standpoint of a scholar - 14/09/2009 04:42:59 PM 889 Views
Re: Not Aginor - 13/09/2009 08:17:28 PM 851 Views
It all depends on how you define "powerful" - 14/09/2009 02:30:31 AM 965 Views
I agree 101%. *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:49:51 AM 488 Views
I think power is much more than raw strength - 14/09/2009 05:00:10 AM 855 Views
I agree for the most part, but disagree on one thing. - 14/09/2009 07:52:10 PM 1007 Views
Re: The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power - 12/09/2009 11:48:03 PM 895 Views
the other reason - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM 825 Views
So is graendal similar to lanfear then? - 13/09/2009 05:41:42 PM 830 Views
Graendal could fight Lanfear and win - 13/09/2009 06:01:57 PM 1386 Views
Graendal herself says... - 13/09/2009 09:08:46 PM 857 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... - 14/09/2009 04:48:37 AM 911 Views
Doesn't Graendal have an Angreal now? - 17/09/2009 03:29:10 AM 941 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... - 15/09/2009 05:36:53 PM 769 Views
Lanfear was more powerful than Graendal, but Cyndane has less power - 13/09/2009 10:19:35 PM 866 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? - 13/09/2009 06:05:11 PM 1009 Views
I agree with this - 13/09/2009 06:15:24 PM 1000 Views
Compulsion=any other deadly weave. Doesn't really change matters - 13/09/2009 10:23:40 PM 881 Views
Excellent point *NM* - 13/09/2009 10:35:08 PM 496 Views
But it did give her an edge, and against two forsaken. *NM* - 13/09/2009 11:12:09 PM 467 Views
Hm? When? *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:04:10 PM 404 Views
tPoD, when she compelled Cyndane and Moghedien. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:19:23 PM 446 Views
Not at all - 14/09/2009 04:51:48 AM 927 Views
Using Compulsion on someone doesn't seem mechanically different - 14/09/2009 09:03:41 PM 772 Views
I'm not so sure about that - 14/09/2009 09:36:45 PM 866 Views
Totally agree - 14/09/2009 10:26:07 PM 689 Views
I don't agree. - 15/09/2009 04:33:04 PM 983 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? - 14/09/2009 04:34:24 PM 824 Views
But Graendal confronted her... twice! *NM* - 13/09/2009 07:48:29 PM 419 Views
Apparently only the third time counts *NM* - 13/09/2009 08:00:37 PM 459 Views
Really? - 13/09/2009 08:36:33 PM 837 Views
No falsely... - 13/09/2009 11:25:40 PM 1064 Views
That's pretty much my opinion in a nutshell - 14/09/2009 04:56:15 AM 1014 Views
And, of course, the male and female OP strength ranks might not even correlate that much - 14/09/2009 04:41:58 PM 789 Views
They correlate on some critical points - 14/09/2009 06:57:43 PM 973 Views
That's not exactly what I'm referring to. - 15/09/2009 04:36:29 PM 745 Views
But then we are discussing the same thing - 15/09/2009 06:59:04 PM 885 Views
I think, outside of semantics, our main disagreement doesn't lie amid the higher tiers - 16/09/2009 03:53:09 PM 752 Views
Probably - 16/09/2009 06:31:27 PM 902 Views
Re: Probably - 16/09/2009 07:19:03 PM 874 Views
Re: Probably - 16/09/2009 08:59:31 PM 831 Views
Re: Probably - 18/09/2009 07:03:09 PM 1168 Views
Ahh the old debate... - 17/09/2009 12:42:36 AM 837 Views
Re: Ahh the old debate... - 17/09/2009 05:26:52 AM 801 Views
I only disagree on one point, I think they are all rather equal in potential, incl. Ishamael - 14/09/2009 04:28:12 PM 857 Views
I do think Ishamel is special - 14/09/2009 07:04:03 PM 947 Views
He's special the same way any individual is special. - 14/09/2009 11:36:42 PM 896 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 08:36:20 AM 870 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 03:48:34 PM 864 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM 847 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 04:53:00 PM 849 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 06:47:45 PM 827 Views
The more interesting question is... - 14/09/2009 06:34:11 PM 788 Views
Hmmm - 14/09/2009 07:04:34 PM 838 Views
I think we'll see Graendal vs. Aran'gar. - 14/09/2009 07:31:16 PM 896 Views
Ah yes, that makes sense, and would be great! *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:40:29 PM 719 Views
Yeah. Though I think its no competition. Graendal has got to be better than a walking tree! - 14/09/2009 07:50:09 PM 786 Views
They do imply that Graendal is a lot more dangerous than she looks - 14/09/2009 09:08:43 PM 815 Views
I've never underestimated Graendal - 14/09/2009 09:42:49 PM 862 Views
Yeah... her frivolity was always a red flag for me too. - 14/09/2009 10:18:40 PM 898 Views
To me, she is the most lethal. - 15/09/2009 05:18:10 PM 659 Views
Yup... - 15/09/2009 06:39:20 PM 706 Views
I still like Lanfear more - 15/09/2009 06:51:03 PM 802 Views
Bah! She's an idiot! - 15/09/2009 07:06:06 PM 803 Views
only in love *NM* - 15/09/2009 07:23:29 PM 765 Views
Graendal did not beat me and Moghedien - 15/09/2009 05:59:39 PM 887 Views
Agreed - 15/09/2009 06:36:48 PM 786 Views
Ummm... how do we know? - 15/09/2009 06:40:57 PM 911 Views
Re: Ummm... how do we know? - 15/09/2009 06:56:21 PM 835 Views
Hmmm... - 15/09/2009 07:07:45 PM 1014 Views

Reply to Message