Active Users:669 Time:30/10/2026 07:13:50 AM
What depresses me... entyti Send a noteboard - 09/02/2011 11:23:13 PM
...is how no one seems to want to discuss the burning topic! RugbyPlayingAshaman has completely hijacked this thread!

I still have no idea what the general consensus is on my idea.
Omnipresent Lurker of WoTMB
Proud and Open Rolan Sympathiser
Fan of Everything Tool
Eternal Shiva Enthusiast
Reply to message
Rand is the Great Serpent - 08/02/2011 04:21:32 AM 2082 Views
Yeah, that seems logical, funny to see rand bite himself in the ass :p *NM* - 08/02/2011 06:31:44 AM 632 Views
I want to reply and say that's not exactly how I picture it, but I don't want to be dirty. *NM* - 08/02/2011 06:50:17 AM 690 Views
there once was a man from nantucket? *NM* - 08/02/2011 07:18:47 AM 603 Views
Bwah ha ha! Dirty minds think alike! *NM* - 08/02/2011 03:41:30 PM 575 Views
That actually seems cosmically plausible - but I really hope this is not the case - 08/02/2011 03:27:29 PM 1399 Views
But that has always been the case. I am astounded that it isn't recognized more often... - 08/02/2011 03:58:24 PM 1273 Views
This. There's a reason one of his archetypes is the Fisher King. *NM* - 08/02/2011 07:00:05 PM 655 Views
The issue is that the Fisher King story is about the Land, not the People - 08/02/2011 08:02:24 PM 1234 Views
A good example - 08/02/2011 08:27:44 PM 1204 Views
None of this is contradicted by what I have posited - 08/02/2011 09:16:48 PM 1147 Views
But the chess analogy is what I'm seeing - the Dragon is necessary in degree not in total. - 09/02/2011 02:42:15 PM 1252 Views
Yes, those are the rules in chess... - 10/02/2011 05:34:25 AM 1155 Views
The Fisher King is not a messianic myth. - 08/02/2011 10:07:44 PM 1236 Views
Fisher King title and legends are connected to the Messianic mythos - 09/02/2011 09:47:14 PM 1440 Views
The disciples, not Jesus, were the "fishers of men." EDITED. - 09/02/2011 10:08:24 PM 1094 Views
Yeah, you're right about the fish - I was reaching (and typed too fast to think) - 10/02/2011 05:30:29 PM 1129 Views
Re: But that has always been the case. I am astounded that it isn't recognized more often... - 09/02/2011 07:47:14 AM 1223 Views
You two are like a married couple without the benefit of the makeup sex. - 09/02/2011 09:30:10 AM 1316 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2011 02:53:17 AM 530 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2011 02:52:28 PM 592 Views
Huh? No. You are so off it's not even funny. - 09/02/2011 03:16:05 AM 1338 Views
Looks like somebody hasn't read The Gathering Storm. - 09/02/2011 06:17:55 AM 1246 Views
Re: Looks like somebody hasn't read The Gathering Storm. - 09/02/2011 06:20:21 AM 1231 Views
Atop Dragonmount, for one... - 09/02/2011 07:36:56 AM 1265 Views
I'm exhausted, so I may be misremembering. - 09/02/2011 09:27:18 AM 1184 Views
That was Tam. - 09/02/2011 05:09:45 PM 1280 Views
That is a key difference. - 09/02/2011 06:38:24 PM 1120 Views
Re: Atop Dragonmount, for one... - 09/02/2011 03:12:02 PM 1236 Views
Not at all! - 10/02/2011 02:58:39 AM 1132 Views
You sound like Ishamael - 09/02/2011 02:38:52 PM 1225 Views
Re: You sound like Ishamael - 09/02/2011 03:17:58 PM 1231 Views
I'm definitely not confusing this with the real world roflmao - 09/02/2011 03:54:04 PM 1330 Views
Re: I'm definitely not confusing this with the real world roflmao - 09/02/2011 06:10:01 PM 1297 Views
Seems to me that you're confused. - 09/02/2011 08:27:06 PM 1064 Views
Seems to me that YOU'RE confused. - 10/02/2011 02:09:41 AM 1197 Views
You might actually want to read what people wrote. - 10/02/2011 03:13:52 PM 1106 Views
The amount of elitism on this board would be depressing if it weren't so damned funny. - 09/02/2011 09:18:13 PM 1158 Views
What depresses me... - 09/02/2011 11:23:13 PM 1080 Views
I didn't mean to hijack it - other replies did - 10/02/2011 02:51:35 PM 1166 Views
It is of little consequence - 10/02/2011 05:36:40 PM 1120 Views
Relax homeboy. It was a joke. *NM* - 10/02/2011 02:07:55 AM 616 Views
I guess the DO just has "Serpent Envy?" *NM* - 12/02/2011 01:13:40 PM 580 Views
*NM* - 12/02/2011 02:47:09 PM 562 Views

Reply to Message