Active Users:337 Time:17/06/2025 12:48:39 PM
There are more than there were before. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
Before Rand revealed the history of the Aiel, there were exactly zero Aiel followers of the Way of the Leaf. Now there is endemic depression among the Aiel, some of whom are leaving to join the Tuatha'an.

Even if this weren't the case, there is no way you can start with zero and end up with a remnant. A remnant is by definition a persistent fraction of a whole, but you cannot divide zero, you cannot have something persist that doesn't already exist.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 1992 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1015 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 965 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 979 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 890 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 979 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1150 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 469 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1025 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1260 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 961 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 931 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 884 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 925 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1175 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 877 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 847 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 782 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 874 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 946 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 889 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 998 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 964 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 991 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 781 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 713 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 921 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 776 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 921 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 811 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 827 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1005 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 775 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 798 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 872 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 852 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 814 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 791 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 963 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 842 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 908 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 934 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 794 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 901 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 787 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 991 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 746 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 784 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 780 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 913 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 696 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 961 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1013 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 905 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 448 Views

Reply to Message