Active Users:639 Time:04/06/2026 08:13:07 AM
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
They abandoned their duties and are largely formed from wetland runaways. They are not Aiel philosophically nor genetically.

As for there still being Jenn at the time of the prophecy, I'd say that's completely irrelevant. If you disagree, you must explain how Rand is supposed to save something that has already died out. Will he master time travel?
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2227 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1231 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 1202 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 1196 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 1126 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 1220 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1472 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 589 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1283 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1624 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 1173 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 1163 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 1108 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 1199 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1438 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 1137 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 1057 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 989 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 1105 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 1211 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 1145 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1241 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 1235 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1239 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 1022 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 915 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 1135 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 1014 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 1176 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 1035 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 1053 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1245 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 993 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 1021 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 1076 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 1093 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 1050 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 1023 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 1188 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 1098 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 1142 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 1170 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 1023 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 1102 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 1071 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1265 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 984 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 1022 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 961 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 1146 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 922 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 1202 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1254 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 1141 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 560 Views

Reply to Message