Active Users:651 Time:31/10/2026 03:25:46 AM
So what you're saying... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
... is that the Rhuidean Prophecy delivered to the Aiel is about how Rand will destroy the Tuatha'an, except for a remnant of a remnant? Why would such a prophecy be given to the Aiel?

Especially given that the Rhuidean Prophecy says: Of the blood, but not raised by the blood, he will come from Rhuidean at dawn and tie you together with bonds you cannot break. He will take you back, and he will destroy you.”

It seems far more reasonable to assume that the four "you"s in that passage refer to the same group, and we can already presume that the first three apply to the Aiel, not to the Tuatha'an (indeed, Rand has done nothing for the Tuatha'an at all).
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2327 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1332 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 1294 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 1279 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 1224 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 1310 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1582 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 654 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1395 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1737 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 1261 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 1265 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 1200 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 1341 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1554 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 1245 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 1151 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 1084 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 1207 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 1341 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 1258 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1365 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 1336 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1347 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 1146 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 1000 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 1239 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 1132 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 1293 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 1149 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 1158 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1349 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 1084 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 1146 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 1199 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 1192 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 1155 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 1117 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 1285 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 1180 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 1242 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 1250 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 1151 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 1189 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 1174 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1378 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 1090 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 1135 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 1050 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 1245 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 1009 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 1303 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1374 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 1234 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 616 Views

Reply to Message