Active Users:178 Time:19/05/2024 01:15:26 PM
No... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
Mixing with the rest of the world too long.


... I said that by being mostly composed of people who were not bloodline Aiel, they were not Aiel genetically.
I also said that by abandoning their charge, they were not Aiel philosophically.
I said that in those two specific areas, the Tuatha'an could not be considered Aiel. I did not assert that either one of these were what defined an Aiel, nor even that both together were. They were simply the two possibilities that seemed most probable for asserting that the Tuatha'an might count as Aiel for the purpose of the prophecy.

2. I think it is an unclear matter on the true nature of the Aiel. Those who live in the Waste and call themselves Aiel would never have been accepted by their ancestors as they do not follow the Way. Thus the people who wrote the Prophesy could have been speaking of the ideological sense of Aiel rather than some racial sense of the Aiel. Personally I am beginning to believe the Aiel will need to embrace the Way once again to save their remnant of a remnant.


Here's the issue.

First of all, following the Way of the Leaf is not the extent of the ideological definition of the Aiel. Their ideology is one of not only pacifism, but also of servitude, something the Tuatha'an do not follow. The Aiel were servants to the Aes Sedai, servants to the Servants of All. Also, if we look at Rand's visions, it seems that being an Aiel is something hereditary, unless it just happened those ancestors were simply following in the family business. Though that would seem unlikely, as surely some of the Clan Chiefs' or Wise Ones' ancestors did not choose to be Aiel? Or maybe that's where the memories stop, at the first non-Aiel ancestor. Anyway, the Tuatha'an abandoned their duties, that's why I said they were not philosophically Aiel.

But let us go by your definition and replace "the Aiel" by "those who follow the Way of the Leaf" in the prophecy you agreed was correct.

Do you then believe that He Who Comes With The Dawn will destroy "those who follow the Way of the Leaf" except for a remnant of a remnant whom he shall save?
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
This message last edited by Fanatic-Templar on 08/04/2012 at 07:13:31 AM
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 1807 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 818 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 764 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 780 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 700 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 775 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 891 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 379 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 790 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 969 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 748 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 746 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 677 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 718 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 963 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 654 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 645 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 579 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 650 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 760 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 682 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 801 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 761 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 781 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 601 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 553 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 742 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 574 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 697 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 599 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 621 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 799 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 576 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 580 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 665 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 657 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 615 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 591 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 776 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 632 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 704 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 729 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 604 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 679 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 606 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 750 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 562 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 571 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 555 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 718 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 498 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 745 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 809 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 697 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 340 Views

Reply to Message