Active Users:195 Time:19/05/2024 11:06:58 AM
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
There are legends that they accept outsiders, but by all evidence we have seen they are clan based and family oriented. In fact they have strong traditions that clearly get passed down through generations. Certainly they have a larger degree out "outside blood" than the Aiel of the waste, but that is not evidence that more than a handful of the Tuatha'an are runaways from other societies ... In fact given the general disdain the vast majority of the world has shown the Tuatha'an it seems highly unlikely that anyone would runaway to join them. Much like the Romani/Gypsy people the Tuatha'an are accused of just about anything that goes amiss when they pass through, including young people going missing.


Seen a lot of red-haired Tuatha'an lately? 'Cause apparently anybody who sees Rand thinks "Aiel" or possibly "royal family of Andor" but nobody thinks "Tinker".

I also see no evidence that there is no sense of servitude within thier community either. In every instance we have seen them they have shown their willingness to serve those around them and their own community. The scene in the TR when they strapped children to their backs is evidence to me that the Tuatha'an have a deeply ingrained sense of service to community. In addition their dedication to finding the Song shows that they have a dedicated task to which they claim service.


Neither of those represent a life of servitude. The first just means they aren't total arseholes and are willing to help out as they can the people who took them in when the shadowspawn armies came after them. The latter means they're dedicated to a cause. Might as well say the Cairhienin nobility live a life of servitude because they're dedicated to the task of acquiring more power and influence.

With that said, you are correct that the Tuatha'an did abandon their duty. But no more so than the Aiel of the Waste did... Perhaps less so as they seemingly adopted a new duty rather than following one task from one Aes Sedai. The Aiel of the waste abandoned the very core of what it meant to be Aiel by abandoning the Way.


Again, you have not provided evidence that being an Aiel is defined by following the Way of the Leaf. But let us accept that for the sake of getting to a point. Then you do accept that the Prophecy of Rhuidean states that He Who Comes With The Dawn will destroy "those who follow the Way of the Leaf" except for a remnant of a remnant whom he shall save?

How do you think Rand will destroy those who follow the Way of the Leaf? Rand has not been seen to be involved with followers of the Way of the Leaf at all, that has mostly fallen in Perrin's area.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 1806 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 818 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 764 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 780 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 700 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 773 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 890 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 379 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 789 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 967 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 747 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 746 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 677 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 717 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 963 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 653 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 645 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 579 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 649 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 760 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 682 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 800 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 760 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 780 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 600 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 553 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 741 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 573 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 696 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 598 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 621 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 797 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 576 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 578 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 663 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 657 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 615 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 590 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 776 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 630 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 704 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 728 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 603 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 677 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 606 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 750 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 562 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 569 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 555 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 718 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 498 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 745 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 809 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 696 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 340 Views

Reply to Message