The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
No one thinks the remnant of a remnant will die ...
The relevant part is that it contrasts the remnant of the remnant with the rest of the Aiel. If the remnant is distinct in that they shall live, then what do you think that makes the others?
Will SAVE THEM ... Not that they will survive or that they will be the ONLY survivors Rand saves, only that a remnant of the Aiel will be part of those he saves. The rest will obviously die out, but that does not mean they will die immediately following TG. We heard Aviendha's vision speak of the "Peace of the Dragon" and we then saw the Aiel of the Waste break that peace and ultimately die out. There is no mention at all of possible people who honored the Peace (i.e. went back to The Way) and thus represent the remnant spoken of in the Prophesy. In short I am saying it is possible that the remnant of the Aiel in the Prophesy will go on to be part of a new larger group who honor the Peace of the Dragon and are in essence the "reborn Aiel".
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 14/04/2012 at 06:08:51 PM
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2207 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1595 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1205 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1176 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1177 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1107 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1198 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1452 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1259 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1588 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
1086 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1276 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1421 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1117 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
1033 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
969 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
1084 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1191 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1125 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1217 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1206 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1213 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
997 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1115 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
989 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1152 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
1011 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
1036 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1219 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
969 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
1002 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
1057 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
1074 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
1034 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
1001 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1163 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
1075 Views
That's exactly it
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1117 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1117 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1145 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
995 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
1081 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
1055 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1242 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
1006 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
940 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1232 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1120 Views
