Active Users:651 Time:31/10/2026 03:21:36 AM
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
No one thinks the remnant of a remnant will die ...


The relevant part is that it contrasts the remnant of the remnant with the rest of the Aiel. If the remnant is distinct in that they shall live, then what do you think that makes the others?


Will SAVE THEM ... Not that they will survive or that they will be the ONLY survivors Rand saves, only that a remnant of the Aiel will be part of those he saves. The rest will obviously die out, but that does not mean they will die immediately following TG. We heard Aviendha's vision speak of the "Peace of the Dragon" and we then saw the Aiel of the Waste break that peace and ultimately die out. There is no mention at all of possible people who honored the Peace (i.e. went back to The Way) and thus represent the remnant spoken of in the Prophesy. In short I am saying it is possible that the remnant of the Aiel in the Prophesy will go on to be part of a new larger group who honor the Peace of the Dragon and are in essence the "reborn Aiel".
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 14/04/2012 at 06:08:51 PM
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2327 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1332 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 1294 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 1279 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 1224 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 1310 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1581 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 654 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1395 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1737 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 1261 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 1265 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 1200 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 1341 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1554 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 1245 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 1151 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 1083 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 1207 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 1341 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 1258 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1365 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 1336 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1347 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 1146 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 1000 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 1238 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 1132 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 1293 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 1149 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 1158 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1349 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 1084 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 1146 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 1199 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 1192 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 1155 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 1117 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 1285 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 1180 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 1241 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 1250 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 1151 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 1189 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 1174 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1378 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 1090 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 1135 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 1050 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 1245 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 1008 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 1302 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1374 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 1234 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 616 Views

Reply to Message