View original post
leaving them alive was risking them killing inhabitants of the Tower. There is a reason the Seanchan assign military rank to the Sul'dam and Egwene would know that from her personal experience as a damane.
leaving them alive was risking them killing inhabitants of the Tower. There is a reason the Seanchan assign military rank to the Sul'dam and Egwene would know that from her personal experience as a damane.
What is that reason? I would be fascinated to see your thoughts on this, since military ignorance is pretty much a general characteristic of most people on these boards. Military ranks has NOTHING to do with combat capabilities, or how dangerous anyone is. Military rank indicates the number of soldiers you can command. Alone in the White Tower, they have no soldiers, and their rank is meaningless. I suppose I should not be surprised at this sort of absurdity, since an inevitable fallback argument of Egwene defenders is her possession of a high rank she did nothing to earn. Rank is NOT an indicator of ANY innate quality, by anyone. Holding military rank does not make you inherently dangerous, nor it is given on the basis of danger or ability. A sul'dam can do nothing without being complete, and Egwene made sure to fix that before murdering them. And again, they can't do jack in bonds of air. Just because it is their "mission" to capture people doesn't mean that they have the ability to do it, or justify murdering them once they are helpless.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 26/12/2015 08:46:07 PM
2574 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 27/12/2015 04:42:28 PM
1664 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 28/12/2015 12:40:49 PM
1915 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 28/12/2015 01:53:00 PM
1752 Views
So about Egwene...
- 28/12/2015 04:26:47 PM
1758 Views
Why do you bother? *NM*
- 29/12/2015 01:23:10 AM
894 Views
Seriously...
- 29/12/2015 01:30:34 AM
1528 Views
You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 11:21:24 AM
1604 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 12:10:51 PM
1700 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 11:25:09 AM
1613 Views
Yet it's Mesaana who forces the head to head confrontation with Egwene
- 30/12/2015 05:25:00 PM
1633 Views
I don't get the "circumstances being created" argument anyway...
- 31/12/2015 02:53:14 AM
1415 Views
Re: I don't get the "circumstances being created" argument anyway...
- 31/12/2015 06:28:33 AM
1560 Views
Damn stupid WoT, never working out the way you think it should!
- 04/01/2016 01:38:45 AM
1586 Views
So you agree, Egwene eliminated on of the Forsaken in a direct conflict
- 04/01/2016 03:28:35 AM
1422 Views
Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 07:17:20 AM
1656 Views
Re: Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 03:59:18 PM
1617 Views
Re: Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 04:19:00 PM
1575 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 06:22:02 PM
1752 Views
Apparently, Egwene shouldn't have killed the Sharans...
- 31/12/2015 02:56:08 AM
1649 Views
it's just an excuse to not give credit to a character he doesn't like
- 31/12/2015 04:44:17 AM
1807 Views
Exactly. The double standard has always existed in Cannoli's rants.
- 31/12/2015 05:31:42 AM
1743 Views
Yes well I've only recently started to realize how distasteful it is
- 31/12/2015 06:27:26 AM
1835 Views
LOL ... Someday you'll come to realize how right we were!!!
*NM*
- 31/12/2015 05:23:18 PM
1006 Views
*NM*
- 31/12/2015 05:23:18 PM
1006 Views
You can dislike Cannoli, you can claim his arguments are biased...
- 31/12/2015 07:09:55 PM
1697 Views
Offended? No, I find it funny, in a needs medication way
- 31/12/2015 07:50:28 PM
1580 Views
It is possible
- 01/01/2016 05:59:51 AM
1708 Views
It's also possible that he created a bunch of sock puppet handles to pat himself on the back
- 01/01/2016 06:53:27 AM
1733 Views
Re: It's also possible that he created a bunch of sock puppet handles to pat himself on the back
- 01/01/2016 08:43:43 AM
1666 Views
She's. Not. A. Real. Person.
- 02/01/2016 01:49:37 AM
1673 Views
Fair enough
- 01/01/2016 09:31:47 AM
1422 Views
Where did I say someone who reads his posts are dumb or something?
- 01/01/2016 05:15:30 PM
1545 Views
See, this is the crap I'm talking about.
- 01/01/2016 06:20:16 PM
1552 Views
Re: See, this is the crap I'm talking about.
- 01/01/2016 07:25:38 PM
1684 Views
Okay, Mark, all kidding and stuff aside, you're being the asshole, here.
- 02/01/2016 03:49:08 AM
1646 Views
Okay...
- 02/01/2016 04:50:24 AM
1498 Views
About insults...
- 02/01/2016 05:04:47 AM
1489 Views
I don't know where to even respond about all this!
- 02/01/2016 07:39:43 PM
1504 Views
Cannoli's the one who got offended.
- 31/12/2015 09:23:45 PM
1455 Views
Yeah, because I was talking about the books, and then you three started talking about me.
- 02/01/2016 03:55:23 AM
1526 Views
Re: Yeah, because I was talking about the books, and then you three started talking about me.
- 02/01/2016 04:56:36 AM
1452 Views
Re: You can dislike Cannoli, you can claim his arguments are biased...
- 01/01/2016 08:41:18 AM
1491 Views
Right? Hell, I was semi-mocking YOU for even bothering to get into it with Cannoli! *NM*
- 01/01/2016 05:20:58 PM
762 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 02:13:32 PM
1487 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 11:50:13 AM
1769 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 05:07:09 PM
1614 Views
My admittedly scratch memory
- 31/12/2015 08:32:51 AM
1542 Views
Re: My admittedly scratch memory
- 31/12/2015 08:47:58 AM
1569 Views
Thanks
- 01/01/2016 06:14:45 AM
1475 Views
One thing...
- 01/01/2016 06:42:10 AM
1407 Views
Re: One thing...
- 01/01/2016 08:49:00 AM
1433 Views
Re: One thing...
- 01/01/2016 01:40:21 PM
1471 Views
We need a term for stuff like that. I nominate "pulling a Brandon" because "BS" is so common.
- 02/01/2016 02:13:19 AM
1511 Views
Interesting
- 01/01/2016 09:18:43 AM
1430 Views
Re: Interesting
- 01/01/2016 05:29:38 PM
1465 Views
Re: Interesting
- 01/01/2016 06:50:26 PM
1433 Views
Or perhaps a mixed circle could figure it out
- 01/01/2016 07:40:02 PM
1491 Views
Re: My admittedly scratch memory
- 02/01/2016 02:10:44 AM
1688 Views
Here we go with the selective criticisms again...
- 02/01/2016 04:23:47 AM
1585 Views
It's not selective to point out legitimate differences in circumstances.
- 02/01/2016 12:25:07 PM
1759 Views
not true, the Sul'dam's mission was to capture or kill as many marath'damane as they could
- 02/01/2016 08:49:28 PM
1428 Views
How are they supposed to do that without a'dam?
- 04/01/2016 01:45:52 AM
1527 Views
Only if they were germane to the issue...
- 03/01/2016 09:32:22 AM
1446 Views
Timing of the creation of the three oaths
- 03/01/2016 08:22:12 PM
1454 Views
Interesting...
- 28/12/2015 02:31:33 PM
1521 Views
Re Perrin
- 29/12/2015 07:24:41 AM
1588 Views
Perrin is right almost all the time. How is he not smart?
- 04/01/2016 08:26:18 AM
1694 Views
