View original post
leaving them alive was risking them killing inhabitants of the Tower. There is a reason the Seanchan assign military rank to the Sul'dam and Egwene would know that from her personal experience as a damane.
leaving them alive was risking them killing inhabitants of the Tower. There is a reason the Seanchan assign military rank to the Sul'dam and Egwene would know that from her personal experience as a damane.
What is that reason? I would be fascinated to see your thoughts on this, since military ignorance is pretty much a general characteristic of most people on these boards. Military ranks has NOTHING to do with combat capabilities, or how dangerous anyone is. Military rank indicates the number of soldiers you can command. Alone in the White Tower, they have no soldiers, and their rank is meaningless. I suppose I should not be surprised at this sort of absurdity, since an inevitable fallback argument of Egwene defenders is her possession of a high rank she did nothing to earn. Rank is NOT an indicator of ANY innate quality, by anyone. Holding military rank does not make you inherently dangerous, nor it is given on the basis of danger or ability. A sul'dam can do nothing without being complete, and Egwene made sure to fix that before murdering them. And again, they can't do jack in bonds of air. Just because it is their "mission" to capture people doesn't mean that they have the ability to do it, or justify murdering them once they are helpless.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 26/12/2015 08:46:07 PM
2686 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 27/12/2015 04:42:28 PM
1773 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 28/12/2015 12:40:49 PM
2026 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 28/12/2015 01:53:00 PM
1898 Views
So about Egwene...
- 28/12/2015 04:26:47 PM
1886 Views
Why do you bother? *NM*
- 29/12/2015 01:23:10 AM
963 Views
Seriously...
- 29/12/2015 01:30:34 AM
1631 Views
You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 11:21:24 AM
1712 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 12:10:51 PM
1815 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 11:25:09 AM
1743 Views
Yet it's Mesaana who forces the head to head confrontation with Egwene
- 30/12/2015 05:25:00 PM
1837 Views
I don't get the "circumstances being created" argument anyway...
- 31/12/2015 02:53:14 AM
1521 Views
Re: I don't get the "circumstances being created" argument anyway...
- 31/12/2015 06:28:33 AM
1664 Views
Damn stupid WoT, never working out the way you think it should!
- 04/01/2016 01:38:45 AM
1706 Views
So you agree, Egwene eliminated on of the Forsaken in a direct conflict
- 04/01/2016 03:28:35 AM
1530 Views
Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 07:17:20 AM
1785 Views
Re: Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 03:59:18 PM
1756 Views
Re: Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 04:19:00 PM
1709 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 06:22:02 PM
1863 Views
Apparently, Egwene shouldn't have killed the Sharans...
- 31/12/2015 02:56:08 AM
1760 Views
it's just an excuse to not give credit to a character he doesn't like
- 31/12/2015 04:44:17 AM
1926 Views
Exactly. The double standard has always existed in Cannoli's rants.
- 31/12/2015 05:31:42 AM
1879 Views
Yes well I've only recently started to realize how distasteful it is
- 31/12/2015 06:27:26 AM
1995 Views
LOL ... Someday you'll come to realize how right we were!!!
*NM*
- 31/12/2015 05:23:18 PM
1068 Views
*NM*
- 31/12/2015 05:23:18 PM
1068 Views
You can dislike Cannoli, you can claim his arguments are biased...
- 31/12/2015 07:09:55 PM
1810 Views
Offended? No, I find it funny, in a needs medication way
- 31/12/2015 07:50:28 PM
1716 Views
It is possible
- 01/01/2016 05:59:51 AM
1831 Views
It's also possible that he created a bunch of sock puppet handles to pat himself on the back
- 01/01/2016 06:53:27 AM
1847 Views
Re: It's also possible that he created a bunch of sock puppet handles to pat himself on the back
- 01/01/2016 08:43:43 AM
1797 Views
She's. Not. A. Real. Person.
- 02/01/2016 01:49:37 AM
1791 Views
Fair enough
- 01/01/2016 09:31:47 AM
1562 Views
Where did I say someone who reads his posts are dumb or something?
- 01/01/2016 05:15:30 PM
1719 Views
See, this is the crap I'm talking about.
- 01/01/2016 06:20:16 PM
1744 Views
Re: See, this is the crap I'm talking about.
- 01/01/2016 07:25:38 PM
1867 Views
Okay, Mark, all kidding and stuff aside, you're being the asshole, here.
- 02/01/2016 03:49:08 AM
1799 Views
Okay...
- 02/01/2016 04:50:24 AM
1618 Views
About insults...
- 02/01/2016 05:04:47 AM
1603 Views
I don't know where to even respond about all this!
- 02/01/2016 07:39:43 PM
1670 Views
Cannoli's the one who got offended.
- 31/12/2015 09:23:45 PM
1577 Views
Yeah, because I was talking about the books, and then you three started talking about me.
- 02/01/2016 03:55:23 AM
1641 Views
Re: Yeah, because I was talking about the books, and then you three started talking about me.
- 02/01/2016 04:56:36 AM
1576 Views
Re: You can dislike Cannoli, you can claim his arguments are biased...
- 01/01/2016 08:41:18 AM
1621 Views
Right? Hell, I was semi-mocking YOU for even bothering to get into it with Cannoli! *NM*
- 01/01/2016 05:20:58 PM
821 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 02:13:32 PM
1615 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 11:50:13 AM
1911 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 05:07:09 PM
1745 Views
My admittedly scratch memory
- 31/12/2015 08:32:51 AM
1650 Views
Re: My admittedly scratch memory
- 31/12/2015 08:47:58 AM
1701 Views
Thanks
- 01/01/2016 06:14:45 AM
1582 Views
One thing...
- 01/01/2016 06:42:10 AM
1538 Views
Re: One thing...
- 01/01/2016 08:49:00 AM
1568 Views
Re: One thing...
- 01/01/2016 01:40:21 PM
1605 Views
We need a term for stuff like that. I nominate "pulling a Brandon" because "BS" is so common.
- 02/01/2016 02:13:19 AM
1653 Views
Interesting
- 01/01/2016 09:18:43 AM
1538 Views
Re: Interesting
- 01/01/2016 05:29:38 PM
1601 Views
Re: Interesting
- 01/01/2016 06:50:26 PM
1537 Views
Or perhaps a mixed circle could figure it out
- 01/01/2016 07:40:02 PM
1637 Views
Re: My admittedly scratch memory
- 02/01/2016 02:10:44 AM
1815 Views
Here we go with the selective criticisms again...
- 02/01/2016 04:23:47 AM
1708 Views
It's not selective to point out legitimate differences in circumstances.
- 02/01/2016 12:25:07 PM
1872 Views
not true, the Sul'dam's mission was to capture or kill as many marath'damane as they could
- 02/01/2016 08:49:28 PM
1539 Views
How are they supposed to do that without a'dam?
- 04/01/2016 01:45:52 AM
1649 Views
Only if they were germane to the issue...
- 03/01/2016 09:32:22 AM
1578 Views
Timing of the creation of the three oaths
- 03/01/2016 08:22:12 PM
1565 Views
Interesting...
- 28/12/2015 02:31:33 PM
1629 Views
Re Perrin
- 29/12/2015 07:24:41 AM
1690 Views
Perrin is right almost all the time. How is he not smart?
- 04/01/2016 08:26:18 AM
1847 Views
