View original post
leaving them alive was risking them killing inhabitants of the Tower. There is a reason the Seanchan assign military rank to the Sul'dam and Egwene would know that from her personal experience as a damane.
leaving them alive was risking them killing inhabitants of the Tower. There is a reason the Seanchan assign military rank to the Sul'dam and Egwene would know that from her personal experience as a damane.
What is that reason? I would be fascinated to see your thoughts on this, since military ignorance is pretty much a general characteristic of most people on these boards. Military ranks has NOTHING to do with combat capabilities, or how dangerous anyone is. Military rank indicates the number of soldiers you can command. Alone in the White Tower, they have no soldiers, and their rank is meaningless. I suppose I should not be surprised at this sort of absurdity, since an inevitable fallback argument of Egwene defenders is her possession of a high rank she did nothing to earn. Rank is NOT an indicator of ANY innate quality, by anyone. Holding military rank does not make you inherently dangerous, nor it is given on the basis of danger or ability. A sul'dam can do nothing without being complete, and Egwene made sure to fix that before murdering them. And again, they can't do jack in bonds of air. Just because it is their "mission" to capture people doesn't mean that they have the ability to do it, or justify murdering them once they are helpless.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 26/12/2015 08:46:07 PM
2641 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 27/12/2015 04:42:28 PM
1724 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 28/12/2015 12:40:49 PM
1981 Views
Re: Let's have a survey! Seven questions, give your opinions
- 28/12/2015 01:53:00 PM
1841 Views
So about Egwene...
- 28/12/2015 04:26:47 PM
1831 Views
Why do you bother? *NM*
- 29/12/2015 01:23:10 AM
938 Views
Seriously...
- 29/12/2015 01:30:34 AM
1589 Views
You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 11:21:24 AM
1668 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 12:10:51 PM
1768 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 11:25:09 AM
1690 Views
Yet it's Mesaana who forces the head to head confrontation with Egwene
- 30/12/2015 05:25:00 PM
1783 Views
I don't get the "circumstances being created" argument anyway...
- 31/12/2015 02:53:14 AM
1482 Views
Re: I don't get the "circumstances being created" argument anyway...
- 31/12/2015 06:28:33 AM
1616 Views
Damn stupid WoT, never working out the way you think it should!
- 04/01/2016 01:38:45 AM
1653 Views
So you agree, Egwene eliminated on of the Forsaken in a direct conflict
- 04/01/2016 03:28:35 AM
1485 Views
Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 07:17:20 AM
1739 Views
Re: Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 03:59:18 PM
1702 Views
Re: Yeah. I just don't see how it redounds to her credit, or is particularly impressive.
- 04/01/2016 04:19:00 PM
1655 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 06:22:02 PM
1814 Views
Apparently, Egwene shouldn't have killed the Sharans...
- 31/12/2015 02:56:08 AM
1716 Views
it's just an excuse to not give credit to a character he doesn't like
- 31/12/2015 04:44:17 AM
1878 Views
Exactly. The double standard has always existed in Cannoli's rants.
- 31/12/2015 05:31:42 AM
1826 Views
Yes well I've only recently started to realize how distasteful it is
- 31/12/2015 06:27:26 AM
1939 Views
LOL ... Someday you'll come to realize how right we were!!!
*NM*
- 31/12/2015 05:23:18 PM
1039 Views
*NM*
- 31/12/2015 05:23:18 PM
1039 Views
You can dislike Cannoli, you can claim his arguments are biased...
- 31/12/2015 07:09:55 PM
1760 Views
Offended? No, I find it funny, in a needs medication way
- 31/12/2015 07:50:28 PM
1663 Views
It is possible
- 01/01/2016 05:59:51 AM
1782 Views
It's also possible that he created a bunch of sock puppet handles to pat himself on the back
- 01/01/2016 06:53:27 AM
1803 Views
Re: It's also possible that he created a bunch of sock puppet handles to pat himself on the back
- 01/01/2016 08:43:43 AM
1744 Views
She's. Not. A. Real. Person.
- 02/01/2016 01:49:37 AM
1741 Views
Fair enough
- 01/01/2016 09:31:47 AM
1506 Views
Where did I say someone who reads his posts are dumb or something?
- 01/01/2016 05:15:30 PM
1653 Views
See, this is the crap I'm talking about.
- 01/01/2016 06:20:16 PM
1662 Views
Re: See, this is the crap I'm talking about.
- 01/01/2016 07:25:38 PM
1797 Views
Okay, Mark, all kidding and stuff aside, you're being the asshole, here.
- 02/01/2016 03:49:08 AM
1745 Views
Okay...
- 02/01/2016 04:50:24 AM
1574 Views
About insults...
- 02/01/2016 05:04:47 AM
1556 Views
I don't know where to even respond about all this!
- 02/01/2016 07:39:43 PM
1607 Views
Cannoli's the one who got offended.
- 31/12/2015 09:23:45 PM
1526 Views
Yeah, because I was talking about the books, and then you three started talking about me.
- 02/01/2016 03:55:23 AM
1590 Views
Re: Yeah, because I was talking about the books, and then you three started talking about me.
- 02/01/2016 04:56:36 AM
1518 Views
Re: You can dislike Cannoli, you can claim his arguments are biased...
- 01/01/2016 08:41:18 AM
1562 Views
Right? Hell, I was semi-mocking YOU for even bothering to get into it with Cannoli! *NM*
- 01/01/2016 05:20:58 PM
796 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 29/12/2015 02:13:32 PM
1561 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 11:50:13 AM
1854 Views
Re: You people are the insane ones
- 30/12/2015 05:07:09 PM
1674 Views
My admittedly scratch memory
- 31/12/2015 08:32:51 AM
1601 Views
Re: My admittedly scratch memory
- 31/12/2015 08:47:58 AM
1637 Views
Thanks
- 01/01/2016 06:14:45 AM
1537 Views
One thing...
- 01/01/2016 06:42:10 AM
1489 Views
Re: One thing...
- 01/01/2016 08:49:00 AM
1512 Views
Re: One thing...
- 01/01/2016 01:40:21 PM
1553 Views
We need a term for stuff like that. I nominate "pulling a Brandon" because "BS" is so common.
- 02/01/2016 02:13:19 AM
1599 Views
Interesting
- 01/01/2016 09:18:43 AM
1493 Views
Re: Interesting
- 01/01/2016 05:29:38 PM
1546 Views
Re: Interesting
- 01/01/2016 06:50:26 PM
1495 Views
Or perhaps a mixed circle could figure it out
- 01/01/2016 07:40:02 PM
1573 Views
Re: My admittedly scratch memory
- 02/01/2016 02:10:44 AM
1758 Views
Here we go with the selective criticisms again...
- 02/01/2016 04:23:47 AM
1655 Views
It's not selective to point out legitimate differences in circumstances.
- 02/01/2016 12:25:07 PM
1825 Views
not true, the Sul'dam's mission was to capture or kill as many marath'damane as they could
- 02/01/2016 08:49:28 PM
1492 Views
How are they supposed to do that without a'dam?
- 04/01/2016 01:45:52 AM
1596 Views
Only if they were germane to the issue...
- 03/01/2016 09:32:22 AM
1527 Views
Timing of the creation of the three oaths
- 03/01/2016 08:22:12 PM
1525 Views
Interesting...
- 28/12/2015 02:31:33 PM
1582 Views
Re Perrin
- 29/12/2015 07:24:41 AM
1645 Views
Perrin is right almost all the time. How is he not smart?
- 04/01/2016 08:26:18 AM
1795 Views
