Active Users:1962 Time:13/11/2026 04:37:24 PM
Re: Then... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 06/10/2009 at 12:25:38 AM
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2476 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 984 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 519 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1164 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1427 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1545 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1126 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1672 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1146 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 475 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1398 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 969 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 1027 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 947 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 1086 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 1032 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 1079 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 996 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 987 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 1091 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 998 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 1074 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1237 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1133 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 1051 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1170 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1121 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1182 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 1028 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1266 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 1091 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1879 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1107 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1196 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1754 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 983 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1101 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1800 Views

Reply to Message