Active Users:2278 Time:18/06/2026 04:15:24 AM
Re: Then... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 06/10/2009 at 12:25:38 AM
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2334 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 900 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 457 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1068 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1288 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1424 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1018 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1580 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1047 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 431 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1305 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 871 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 923 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 847 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 961 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 942 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 984 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 891 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 892 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 995 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 899 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 952 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1101 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1004 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 945 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1068 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1021 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1077 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 927 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1133 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 986 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1752 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1002 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1097 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1623 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 883 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1002 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1705 Views

Reply to Message