Active Users:1632 Time:25/08/2025 12:33:15 AM
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal Jim Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
With all of the seepage between Rand and Moridin it's only a matter of time until he starts gaining some of Moridin's memories, including the fact that Graendal killed Asmo.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1303 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 750 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 872 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 857 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 701 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 663 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 676 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 596 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 548 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 579 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 721 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 740 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 584 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 651 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 763 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 735 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 642 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 275 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 257 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 719 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 850 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 259 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 248 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 568 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 654 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 254 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 683 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 716 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 709 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 581 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 724 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 638 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 610 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 668 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 602 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 544 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 832 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 266 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 251 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 583 Views

Reply to Message