We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
I don't see as how RJ's original probable intent matters a whole lot in the discussion. I agree that an Asmo-killer pov would be best, but I can't agree that it will be the method.
Because it obviously would have a more powerful impact. If Graendal was the killer, BS just had the chance to reveal it in her PoV in TGS, prologue. Why then, should he skip this opportunity to let it e.g. Moridin tell someone else that Graendal did it? Makes no sense.
And I actually bet that no one, who thought Graendal did it, even considered the possibilty before TGS that the revelation won't be in Graendal's PoV. The idea that a third person will reveal the killer is just an attempt to rescue a wrong theory. Graendaldunnit is as dead as Graendal, IMO.
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
- 1303 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
- 750 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
- 872 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
- 855 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
- 701 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
- 663 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
- 675 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
- 596 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
- 548 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
- 579 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
- 721 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
- 651 Views
That's wrong
14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
- 763 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
- 734 Views
right here
15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
- 642 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
- 288 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
- 275 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
- 276 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
- 849 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
- 654 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
- 716 Views
No. Try again.
14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
- 722 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you!
*NM*
15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
- 259 Views

Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
- 638 Views
Nonsense...
15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
- 609 Views
Your tenacity is impressive.
15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
- 668 Views

Absolut statements in such discussions...
15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
- 600 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
- 544 Views